If you blame Harper for his appointments, then lack of electability may in fact be the problem. To tell you the truth, I don't think anybody would've questioned Harper's appointments at the outset because those chosen had good if not impeccable reputations.
We can go back into time and complain about patronage appointments by Trudeau or under John Turner's reign, so to stop the perception of patronage bias, there should be elections for the Senate.
I don't think so. Like if you look down south in the states you'll see the effect of elections, non-stop circus.
Also, people don't pay attention. Duffy in particular was partially responsible for Harper's first success as he never let Stephane Dion get the customary 'do-over' of an interview and instead broadcast raw video. This video became iconic, sealing the perception that Stephane was a stuttering goofball. Any time someone from the press crosses over to politics, there ought to be a question.
Remarkably none of Trudeau's or Turners patronage appointments stink as much as these, unless you can provide me with some examples. Besides, it's a stupid excuse. Conservatives always seem to point fingers at the Liberals when it comes time to be accountable. Pointing fingers and saying 'he did it too' is not being accountable.
Also fmahovalich, tripping over your own ass in your haste to bring up Harb just makes you look like a flaming turd.