Phony John Tory becomes part of TCHC problem by sanctioning bonuses

boodog

New member
Oct 28, 2009
3,054
0
0
Almost a year ago while electioneering for mayor, John Tory signed a Code of Conduct which promised, among other things, to tighten spending rules and oversight mechanisms.

“We work for Torontonians — not the other way around,” he indicated back then.

You could have knocked me over with a feather Monday when I heard him not only sanction the outrageous bonuses of up to 20% for three senior execs approved by the Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) board last month. But he also seemed to imply that doing so in secret was fine by him.

He would concede, but only when pressed about the optics of handing out bonuses when TCHC has close to a $1-billion repair backlog, that “sometimes the optics are difficult.”

As revealed in my column Monday, the board voted in secret Feb. 19 to reward general counsel Pamela Spencer and interim CEO Greg Spearn 20% bonuses, on top of their base salary for 2014. CFO Jason Gorel was awarded a bonus of 15%. The bonuses, which I calculated could cost taxpayers as much as $125,000, have already been paid out.

Tory told the media he took a look at the bonus criteria and was “satisfied” that the things listed were “done, many of them.”

I would argue, however, that if directing money to repairs, as he said one exec was charged with doing to get his bonus — in other words doing the job he’s supposed to do — is in Tory’s world rigorous enough to get a 20% bonus, that sure doesn’t say much about the standards he expects from his employees.

There is so much wrong with what Tory said I don’t know where to begin.

This is the man who is going to clean up the TCHC? Yikes!

This is the man who pledged to put Torontonians first and to be open and transparent?

Tory didn’t comment on the fact that a scandalous 20% was awarded to these people. Instead, he tried to spin it, as TCHC chairman Bud Purves did with me, that this was part of the total salary package for these execs.

What utter nonsense. I’m willing to bet that when the Sunshine List comes out next week it will show Spencer, Spearn and Gorel already made very generous salaries in 2014, without the bonuses (which won’t be listed until next year). Let’s not forget that they have generous benefits and a $700-a-month car allowance, as well.

Besides, who gets a 20% bonus these days, even in the private sector? It is especially distasteful to executives making big bucks when the TCHC has no clue how it will fund a whopping $1.7-billion capital repair backlog in the next 10 years.

Tim Collins, a three-year resident in a TCHC complex in the O’Connor-St. Clair Ave. area, said the top brass seems to forget they’re working for a non-profit housing authority.

“The people should come first and the backlog,” he said. “It’s not like any of them need the money ... It’s disgusting they are getting richer while buildings are falling apart.”

Bonnie Booth, a 15-year TCHC resident, noted that the slogan “We put residents at the heart of everything we do” really needs to be removed from the TCHC website.

Tory doesn’t appear to understand the difference between the public and private sectors.

That was particularly obvious when he said throughout his life, with every job he has had (except for the public service), he received bonuses, or performance pay as a component of his compensation.

That’s all well and good if you’re working for Rogers and providing a service for profit which customers can choose to use or not to use. Tory and his pals can knock themselves out awarding themselves perks and pay and they can do so behind closed doors.

But this is public money, and public money which is not being directed at repairs.

What about deciding on the bonuses behind closed doors and refusing to tell me, when asked, how much two consultants’ studies from Mercer and Global Governance Advisors are costing TCHC to look at performance pay for the rest of management from execs on down?

If anything, Tory’s milquetoast response Monday has enabled TCHC management to keep porking at the trough. He has become part of the problem, not the solution. By sanctioning the bonuses for the senior execs and performance pay in general, he has told the TCHC brass that it is fine to extend these bonuses to managers.

He has also sent a signal to those councillors on the board who’ve refused to defend their decision to approve the bonuses by hiding behind the in-camera argument — Ana Bailao and Joe Cressy — that it is fine to be unaccountable. And here I thought they were champions of the poor and disadvantaged.

I’m disgusted by all of it.

http://www.torontosun.com/2015/03/23/tory-becomes-part-of-tchc-problem-by-sanctioning-bonuses
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,560
6,762
113
What did you expect from Mr. Rogers?
 
Last edited:

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,841
5,735
113
I'm not a fan of the present structure for this either. Unfortunately it was too easy to achieve the goals for the bonus. The criteria needs to be changed.

And Boo........you attacked Tory for the Firing of The Two Ttc construction heads, yet now want to attack him for this. Make up your mind. Do we hold execs accountable no matter what or not?
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,841
5,735
113
That sounds reasonable.

What do you suggest?
I wouldn't have a clue as to the goals that need to be achieved to reach a bonus structure. Right now they are like sports contracts where if a batter hits 250 at bats he gets a bonus.

I'm pretty sure Tory is thinking a bonus structure more like the private sector.

The housing is a nightmare. And you can't lay blame on any one gov't or party. A combination of neglect for infrastructure and activists pushing to increase stock has created this. Couple it with the continued downloading of the costs and refusal to acknowledge that being the largest landlord in Canada for arguably the worst tenants that can be had and I don't think anyone will be able to unravel it anytime soon.

Just set goals for gradual improvement I suppose. Percentage of repairs to be completed improved would be a good start.
 

Wendel

Member
Oct 2, 2003
949
0
16
brampton
I wouldn't have a clue as to the goals that need to be achieved to reach a bonus structure. Right now they are like sports contracts where if a batter hits 250 at bats he gets a bonus.

I'm pretty sure Tory is thinking a bonus structure more like the private sector.

The housing is a nightmare. And you can't lay blame on any one gov't or party. A combination of neglect for infrastructure and activists pushing to increase stock has created this. Couple it with the continued downloading of the costs and refusal to acknowledge that being the largest landlord in Canada for arguably the worst tenants that can be had and I don't think anyone will be able to unravel it anytime soon.

Just set goals for gradual improvement I suppose. Percentage of repairs to be completed improved would be a good start.
Wtf did a general counsel and an interim CEO do to earn 20% bonuses and a CFO 15% working for government housing. Just government housing for fuck sake.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,841
5,735
113
Wtf did a general counsel and an interim CEO do to earn 20% bonuses and a CFO 15% working for government housing. Just government housing for fuck sake.
Again I'm not sure. But I do know that the city is the largest landlord in Canada. It would follow that salary compensation would need to be decent to attract qualified people to run it.

The question isn't about the pay, it's about the criteria and goal accomplishment that earns it. My understanding from what I read is both were wearing two hats with the loss of Jones, and the head of human resources there for the past year.

And as I stated above the whole housing issue is a quagmire. It will take a very real effort from several sources to put a real dent in it.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Boo preferred it when Rob Ford was stacking it full of cronies from his campaign who got 100k jobs for doing nothing. Blatant patronage, Ford Nation lined up at TCHC like hogs at the taxpayer trough, gravy train flowing right down their throats.

What is different now is Tory is paying people to DO something, nor rewarding campaign volunteers with cushy jobs like Ford did.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,841
5,735
113
Boo preferred it when Rob Ford was stacking it full of cronies from his campaign who got 100k jobs for doing nothing. Blatant patronage, Ford Nation lined up at TCHC like hogs at the taxpayer trough, gravy train flowing right down their throats.

What is different now is Tory is paying people to DO something, nor rewarding campaign volunteers with cushy jobs like Ford did.
Yup

And before that Adam Vaughn kept pushing to use the budget to purchase more housing as opposed to maintaining what we had.

And two provincial parties who downloaded and continued to download it and the cut the funding.

This is a mess in the making for decades. At this point laying blame at any one doorstep is useless. All that can be done now is to start upping the maintenance and get rid of the condemned stuff on valuable land. Make a small dent and get things moving forward.
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
11,251
3,909
113
And as I stated above the whole housing issue is a quagmire. It will take a very real effort from several sources to put a real dent in it.
Tory's oft repeated claims that he was the only candidate who had 'right connections', that being 'other levels of government' and 'friends in high places', to come to the rescue was his Plan A.

Failing the above as evidenced by Tory's shock that the provincial government told him to 'stick it' when he went to them to ask for 'mo money', Tory stated that he would default to his 'Plan B from fantasy land', which is to 'shame other levels of government' into action.

Apparently his 'shaming' really meant that he would shamelessly pretend to balance the budget, sans the 'no mo money', by issuing a personal IOU to himself to be paid for by Toronto taxpayer which is his Plan C.

Plan C, appears will be Tory's modus operandi throughout his term. A 'now you see it, now you don't' cheap carnival magician's trick.

There is another plan, Plan 'Get Real Mr. Tory'. However, that plan is beyond the grasp and scope of the great illusionist.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,841
5,735
113
Tory's oft repeated claims that he was the only candidate who had 'right connections', that being 'other levels of government' and 'friends in high places', to come to the rescue was his Plan A.

Failing the above as evidenced by Tory's shock that the provincial government told him to 'stick it' when he went to them to ask for 'mo money', Tory stated that he would default to his 'Plan B from fantasy land', which is to 'shame other levels of government' into action.

Apparently his 'shaming' really meant that he would shamelessly pretend to balance the budget, sans the 'no mo money', by issuing a personal IOU to himself to be paid for by Toronto taxpayer which is his Plan C.

Plan C, appears will be Tory's modus operandi throughout his term. A 'now you see it, now you don't' cheap carnival magician's trick.

There is another plan, Plan 'Get Real Mr. Tory'. However, that plan is beyond the grasp and scope of the great illusionist.
Please feel free to tell us what other candidate would have been able to solve this quickly and how.......
 

boodog

New member
Oct 28, 2009
3,054
0
0
Please feel free to tell us what other candidate would have been able to solve this quickly and how.......
Your Scarborough Subway hero Rob Ford did support the idea of Case Ootes interim TCHC managing director to sell off some properties and use the proceeds to provide proper repairs and maintenance for the rest of TCHC properties as well as to help out the city budget depending of course on how big the selling proceeds would be.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,841
5,735
113
Rob Ford did support the idea of Case Ootes interim TCHC managing director to sell some properties and use the proceeds to provide proper repairs and maintenance for the rest of TCHC properties as well as to help out the city budget depending of course on how big the selling proceeds would be.
But it didn't happen. I remember that but it went nowhere. As such he either didn't follow up or was blocked from it.

So again it isn't about an idea but executing it. There are I believe 300 units presently unlivable in the city. Some are million+ properties downtown. Imagine the volume of repairs that could be done.

But it's a quagmire. Of unions stating only they can do it, councillors who won't see reality and be pragmatic, activists like John Clarke and his circus, all blocking real progress.

I'm not sure if anyone can navigate this one.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Your Scarborough Subway hero Rob Ford did support the idea of Case Ootes interim TCHC managing director to sell off some properties and use the proceeds to provide proper repairs and maintenance for the rest of TCHC properties as well as to help out the city budget depending of course on how big the selling proceeds would be.
But instead Ford got cushy 100k "jobs" doing nothing for lackies from his campaign.

He used TCHC as his own private piggy bank to reward his supporters.
 

boodog

New member
Oct 28, 2009
3,054
0
0
But instead Ford got cushy 100k "jobs" doing nothing for lackies from his campaign.

He used TCHC as his own private piggy bank to reward his supporters.
Will you be kind enough to show us the link(s)?
 

boodog

New member
Oct 28, 2009
3,054
0
0
But it didn't happen. I remember that but it went nowhere. As such he either didn't follow up or was blocked from it.

So again it isn't about an idea but executing it. There are I believe 300 units presently unlivable in the city. Some are million+ properties downtown. Imagine the volume of repairs that could be done.

But it's a quagmire. Of unions stating only they can do it, councillors who won't see reality and be pragmatic, activists like John Clarke and his circus, all blocking real progress.

I'm not sure if anyone can navigate this one.
Rob Ford did not campaign on this platform in 2010.

He supported the Case Ootes idea in 2011 (or 2012?) but he had no mandate from the vote/citizens of Toronto to carry it out facing vocal opposition inside and outside the Council you listed above.

(mind you he was the only one who supported Case Ootes' idea)

So when you stated, "Please feel free to tell us what other candidate would have been able to solve this quickly and how......." my answer is absolutely your Scarborough Subway hero Rob Ford.
 

boodog

New member
Oct 28, 2009
3,054
0
0
Did you even read the hater text from Toronto Star?

http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hal...big_raise.html

Four years ago, Lisa-Joan Overholt was one of the campaign volunteers trying to get out the vote for Rob Ford.

Three years ago, she was a part-time constituency assistant for an Etobicoke councillor closely allied with Ford.

Last year, she made $112,923 as the Toronto Community Housing Corp.’s senior director of community safety and its council liaison.

Overholt’s rapid rise has been the subject of confusion and complaint within the TCHC. In a damning report on Tuesday, the city ombudsman cited her case as one of five especially “egregious” violations of human resources policies at the city-owned landlord.

The ombudsman determined that TCHC chief executive Gene Jones created a position for Overholt while she was working as executive assistant to Ford loyalist Vincent Crisanti, who had originally hired her on a part-time basis after the campaign.

The new TCHC job, at the “manager” level, was not advertised. Less than six months after Overholt was hired, she was promoted to a newly created senior director position, which did not even have a job description, and given a $30,000 raise.

Overholt thrived at TCHC after her late-campaign work for Ford despite a civilian police career that ended unhappily not long earlier — after she was accused of “sexual harassment,” “abuse of authority,” and other alleged misdeeds she has emphatically denied. City councillors have praised Overholt as diligent and effective in her role with the TCHC.

Before being hired at TCHC she got a reference from Ford’s then-aide Mark Towhey, according to two city hall sources. A separate city hall source recalled Overholt saying “the mayor vouched for her personally” to Jones. The Star has no evidence these endorsements had any bearing on her being hired or her later promotion.

Under her former name, Lisa Hunt, she had donated $785 to Ford’s campaign; she also donated $300 to Doug Ford’s council campaign. Overholt and the mayor’s chief of staff did not respond to requests for comment.

In announcing her promotion, the TCHC said “Lisa has deep knowledge and experience of City Hall.” She appears to have worked there for less than three years, after serving 22 years with the police.

Overholt is now responsible for two portfolios. As council liaison, she is the point person for councillors whose constituents have TCHC-related issues. As senior director of community safety, she is responsible for security at the TCHC’s 350 properties.

At the police, she worked as a supervisor in charge of security and 70 employees at the provincial courthouse in a Finch Ave. strip mall.

Her police career ended in turmoil. According to a 2009 arbitration report, the force told her it was going to fire her in response to complaints about “derogatory and/or inappropriate comments of a sexual nature,” “bullying and intimidation of employees,” and other issues.

An internal investigator found that only two of the accusations could be substantiated. But the investigator nonetheless claimed to have found “a disturbing pattern of unacceptable comments or conduct,” and the force said “the conduct is longstanding and appears to have escalated over time.”

Overholt offered “emphatic denials” and explanations. She also filed a grievance. The force later informed her that it had discovered “mitigating factors” and would suspend her, then demote her to a non-supervisory role, rather than firing her.

Overholt left the force after receiving an undisclosed amount of money in a grievance settlement, said a source familiar with the deal.

Councillors used to deal with local TCHC officials. Councillor Paula Fletcher said Jones’ new centralized system, led by Overholt, has been more efficient, and that Overholt has been “responsive” and “professional.” She said Overholt worked successfully to address a situation involving an abusive tenant.

“I couldn’t get any traction on this, and it was through Lisa being there and being able to get to the CEO and put the attention on it that we managed to solve this one,” Fletcher said.

http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hal...big_raise.html
 

destillat

Well-known member
Aug 29, 2001
2,812
67
48
mississauga
OK, so she does a good job... whoop-dee-fucking-doo... Lots of people are good at their jobs... but NOT $112K worth of good, asshole.

I know that you are too stupid to comprehend this... but the only way someone goes from being a part time constituency assistant to a sunshine-list director in 3 years is if someone (Fatty) made it happen.
 

boodog

New member
Oct 28, 2009
3,054
0
0
OK, so she does a good job... whoop-dee-fucking-doo... Lots of people are good at their jobs... but NOT $112K worth of good, asshole.
According to the Toronto Star hater press the democratically elected "City Councilors have praised Overholt as diligent and effective in her role with the TCHC."

I know that you are too stupid to comprehend this... but the only way someone goes from being a part time constituency assistant to a sunshine-list director in 3 years is if someone (Fatty) made it happen.
The only way?

You got proof on that?
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts