PLease HELP to create "Ottawa MP spreadsheet"

[alex6]

Ottawa Hobbyist, I am looking to create a Ottawa MP Spreadsheet.

As you all know of my love of making polls and compiling data. I want to make something that I believe will be of great benefit of all Ottawa hobbyist.

Honestly when I look threw the Sun and see a ad for example
"Oasis: Natasha, Mandy, Shantal, etc" I don't know what most of these girls look like. I think It would be helpful to have a list of the "look" of the attendants. No reviews, just infomation on their physical appearance.

I think it would save all of us time and more importantly money in choosing a MP to visit.

Therefore I am asking all of you out there to submit basic descriptions of the appearance MP attentants to this thread so I can compile them, create and repost a OTTAWA MP QUICK REFERENCE SPREADSHEET for us to all have.

If you wish instead PM me with the attendants details so I can add them to the future spreadsheet.

Please include data on their: age, race, weight, height, hair color, visible tattos,( if any) and overall attractiveness.

Thanks
Alex6

 

[drdrrp]

why don't we make one for both MPs and SPs?

 

[figjam4]

How is it going?

Alex6, how is the spreadsheet going anyways?

 

[alex6]

Alex6, how is the spreadsheet going anyways?

It coming along I have been busy this week so It has been slow but I will put in the time this weekend and next week to get the first version out.

Thanks again to all you are making this spreadsheet possible!

 

[alex6]

MPs and SPs

why don't we make one for both MPs and SPs?

Honestly I never visit SP's so I know very little about them. Plus websites like EC - has pics and stats on all the top sp's in Ottawa. Unlike MP's where this is less info on them in one easy to find place.

 

[alex6]

Does anyone have any details on these attendants?

Hi All,

Does any of you out there have any info on these attendants:

Bodybasics
Jessie
Juile
Lisa

Oasis
Santana
Natasha
Shantal
Mandy

I would like to add their details to the spreasheet.

Please include data on their: approx age, race, weight, height, hair color, visible tattos,( if any) and overall attractiveness.

PM is always prefered if you care to share more than their basic statistics.
Thanks again!

 

[AYBABTU2003]

What's going on?

Ottawa Hobbyist, I am looking to create a Ottawa MP Spreadsheet.

We still don't know why the spreadsheet thread has entirely disappeared.

Alex6, are you still here?

 

[gmuoo]

Other threads started by him are still around so it's a targeted removal. Maybe something inappropriate or some info or some unfavourable comments about certain MPs should not be there so it got removed as a whole just the same way how one the threads you were involved in got removed totally.

 

[ricflairjuniour]

The Mod's explanation for removal of the MP spreadsheet is that certain MPs and MAs complained that they were "delisted" or threatened with "delisting" over issues that were posted and debated on the board (including the health situation awhile back). In the Mod's view the use of the spreadsheet to delist MPs/MAs was "inappropriate".

I'm not going to express any opinion. Not going there. I'm not privy to the background.

It's really too bad because alex6 was a straight-shooter and worked hard on creating and maintaining the spreadsheet.

 

[ncn2004]

I believe that the spreadsheet was the best thing on the board.

The information on it was very pratical, and usefull. Anyone that complained about it for getting delisted, or threatened to be delisted should look at the reason for it and correct the problem.

The spread sheet was doing exactly what is should have been doing, and that is keeping hobbiests informed and giving important information as needed.

It appears that Alex6 was doing a very good job of staying neutral and giving a complete picture based on the information that was available at the time.

The moderator should really re consider the removal of the spreadsheet!! or, come up with a better way to do it, instead of removing it without an alternative.

But thats just my opinion... What does everyone else think??

 

[antlerman]

agreed

As a group....along with the mods input we should be ale to come up with a posting guidline and spreadshhet that will benifit all

 

[AnotherGuy02]

MP Spreadsheet

There is a spreadsheet for SPs in Montreal. It is not located on MERB or the other Montreal review boards. It has a separate web address. If someone has the data the MP spreadsheet contained and is willing to maintain the list perhaps this is the solution to the problem. TERB would not be responsible for the content of the MP spreadsheet.

Just my two cents,

AnotherGuy02

 

[chuckles]

MP Spreadsheet

Hi,

I found the MP spread sheet to be very useful. If we had a spreadsheet with just the names of the Massage Parlours and their staff, plus a description of the MP's that should be acceptable????

AS for the old one being removed because of complaints then maybe the MPs at those locations should have just made their workplaces more cleaner and attractive for their clients. It would have given them more clients and profits. Instead they do something stupid like complain to the terb moderator.

 

[gmuoo]

If ric is right, the issue of it being removed is not because of MA/MPs complained that the contents listed something inappropriate or some needed improvements for their places or services. But it sounded like there was more going on behind the scenes why some MA/MPs were getting delisted or threatened to be delisted. In a way, it seemed that the spreadsheet had become a leverage tool on certain issues on perhaps a not-so-unbiased basis.

The Mods probably had furhter insights to all these as they could view and examine everyone's PM box and saw what actually went on among all the parties involved. I just found it hard to believe the Mods would remove a thread because it contained something negative about some MP/MAs. If that is the case, half of the threads would have been removed by now especially the ones covering bad reviews.

Personally, I never thought the health care stunt thread had anything to do with everyone's health care at all. It was more like a targeted game towards hurting one or perhaps more than one MPs' business. It was fairly tasteless but that's just me.

The Mod's explanation for removal of the MP spreadsheet is that certain MPs and MAs complained that they were "delisted" or threatened with "delisting" over issues that were posted and debated on the board (including the health situation awhile back). In the Mod's view the use of the spreadsheet to delist MPs/MAs was "inappropriate".

 

[DoubleDave]

IBut it sounded like there was more going on behind the scenes why some MA/MPs were getting delisted or threatened to be delisted. In a way, it seemed that the spreadsheet had become a leverage tool on certain issues on perhaps a not-so-unbiased basis.

Personally, I never thought the health care stunt thread had anything to do with everyone's health care at all. It was more like a targeted game towards hurting one or perhaps more than one MPs' business. It was fairly tasteless but that's just me.

gmuoo,

150 posts since May, you sure talk a lot...

alex6 heard something that he believed to be true and he felt that listing the establishment(s) in question would put fellow hobbyists at risk. He went with his conscience and removed the references to the establishments from the spreadsheet The worst comment I saw him make in reference to all of this was that he didn’t visit M.Ps that weren’t on the list.

Alex6 may be somewhat of an alarmist, but accusing him of targeting or intentionally hurting an M.P. as part of some game seems way over the top to me and totally uncalled for.

You’ve suggested starting another spreadsheet, why don’t you take it on and put your editorials to good use.

DD

 

[ricflairjuniour]

Without getting into details, from what I understand Double Dave is right on the money. Alex6 became aware of a potential health risk which at the time was unsubstantiated. His initial post was carefully written so as to not accuse anyone. Members were asked to PM him to substantiate what he had heard. Based on the information he received in private (none of which was 100% verifiable) he was of the view that the MP in question should be delisted. He acted out of caution. And yes, he's cautious by nature. The MP complained to the Mods that it was the victim of a smear campaign by an MA who left the establishment. The Mods maintained a neutral stance on the health issue, but decided they did not want to sponsor a spreadsheet which could be used to delist an MP. That's why it's gone.

Alex6 was entirely well intentioned. Not vindictive at all.

 

[Harddaysknight]

Hi All,

Does any of you out there have any info on these attendants:

Bodybasics
Jessie
Juile
Lisa

Oasis
Santana
Natasha
Shantal
Mandy

I would like to add their details to the spreasheet.

Please include data on their: approx age, race, weight, height, hair color, visible tattos,( if any) and overall attractiveness.

PM is always prefered if you care to share more than their basic statistics.
Thanks again!

Body Basics _ saw Jessie on Sunday - Cute girl, not slender but not plump either, Nicw small breasts with the right nibble with a small bar through it.

Massage was firm and very enjoyable, no teasing but things still started to rise! Basic menu, very talented ! Repeat with her is a yes!

 

[gmuoo]

Obviously, I don't want to fight with everyone and I won't. I am here for fun and for informative facts to help my hobby. I don't think there is any doubt about alex's effort in starting and putting the MP spreadsheet together. I am sure everyone including me appreciate this a lot. That was not my issue.

I believe I have been around long enough dealing with different people to read between the lines when it is an advise, a sarcasm, a game play, a stunt, ... When I first read the Heath Risk Advisory post, I thought it was tasteless and I still do. DD and ric, you may or may not agree but I could not care less. This is a forum for us to discuss things transparently to help everyone of us make our own judgement and decisions. If there is a real health issue, why not present all the facts and the source so we can all add our own thoughts/experience in and make informed decisions collectively ourselves afterwards. I am a full grown adult. I don't need things to be censored/delisted for me. If I do, I will stay home and watch PBS on TV. I wouldn't be here; nor will many others! (Why not just put the heath issue in the spreadsheet too so we can all comment and validate it?) I want to make informed judgements based on facts whether it is a real risk for me or not. For those of us that go beyond the rub-n-tub, we know better what the risks are and for sure know how to protect ourselves. We are not in kingergarden.

If no one else steps up to the plate to start and maintain the new spreadsheet, I don't mind doing that as I have plenty of time sitting on a plane a lot. It does not really take too much editorial skills as it is mostly cut and paste. I will get a free hosting site up and have it set up there. If I get sick of doing it, I will let everyone know and find a good suitor to pass the account passwd to him/her to maintain. If some of you are running Google Desktop on your computer, you may be able to find some pages of the MP spreadsheet in your browser cache. If you do find something, just post it up and I will add them to the new spreadsheet being hosted somewhere else so it won't get lost in the future.

 

[ricflairjuniour]

Gmuoo, it`s pretty simple. Posting unsubstantiated allegations of the kind involved in the health warning could have unfairly damaged someone`s reputation and business and it`s squarely against TERB`s rules. No need to analyze it farther than that.

Here`s an example:

https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=87955&highlight=HIV*

But let`s be clear about this. Alex6 did not to my knowledge violate these rules. He held back names and he asked for confirmation of the health situation, by PM.

 

[wilbur]

I thought that the spreadsheet got too subjective on certain MP's. The clincher was when there was a suggestion that certain MPA's were going to be delisted because of hearsay. Sounded like a lynch mob to me.

If the spreadsheet comes back, may I suggest that it stick to the facts. At the very least, if there is a difference of opinion on a certain MPA, then the other opinions should be mentionned. I questioned a few negative and derogatory comments on a certain MP, and they were ignored by the spreadsheet author. I started questioning it's objectivity from that point. A bit of reserve and consideration next time, please.

Wilbur.