Poll: Tattoos
- Thread starter K Douglas
- Start date
I prefer zero ink but I have slept with so many that have ink - I would never get laid if this preference were etched in stone.
i would have to agree, but put on a high end face like Angelina Jolie, then perhaps the tats may seem nothing butt beautiful
If her service is great, I'm willing to overlook her body art. Even the lack of boobs. But seriously. My ATF, since disappeared, was covered with the ugliest tats conceivable. But, she could extract some serious mileage out of me. So, there's that.i would have to agree, but put on a high end face like Angelina Jolie, then perhaps the tats may seem nothing butt beautiful
I dont mind if there is flow to them or they tie in together
Just random ink for the sake of ink isnt a good look
I thnk Amanda in the beaches has some of the sexiest tats ive seen not too big mot too small and location s were awesome
T.
Just random ink for the sake of ink isnt a good look
I thnk Amanda in the beaches has some of the sexiest tats ive seen not too big mot too small and location s were awesome
T.
For me no tattoos, a couple of tattoos, or heavily tattooed does not make a difference as long as the woman is attractive. At the same time there are also some tattoos that look like they were done in someone's basement or in jail and look horrendous.
Majority of people are tattooed these days, it's a part of the current pop culture and the trend has been growing since a couple of decades ago where tattoos were associated for the majority with unsavoury characters like gang members, bikers and others. I believe the majority of 50+ years old still have that mentality of thinking when it comes to tattoos, while the majority of the 50 and under have the exact opposite and look at it as a form of expressing themselves.
Also majority of SP's cover up their tattoos in their pictures with photo shop I believe both agencies and SP's should make it clear they have tattoos as to not disappoint clients who do not like tattoos, it doesn't make a difference to me but I can understand why it does to others.
Majority of people are tattooed these days, it's a part of the current pop culture and the trend has been growing since a couple of decades ago where tattoos were associated for the majority with unsavoury characters like gang members, bikers and others. I believe the majority of 50+ years old still have that mentality of thinking when it comes to tattoos, while the majority of the 50 and under have the exact opposite and look at it as a form of expressing themselves.
Also majority of SP's cover up their tattoos in their pictures with photo shop I believe both agencies and SP's should make it clear they have tattoos as to not disappoint clients who do not like tattoos, it doesn't make a difference to me but I can understand why it does to others.
You guys who say you wouldn’t see ladies with tats or piercings are really limiting yourselves form some wonderful experiences. Your loss.
I try to aviod ladies with fake boobs or fake anything. I was told I was limiting myself, so. Tried a few. And yup, plastic boobs are a real turn off for me. Used to see a couple girls who were good, but not interested now that they have had surgery.
I try to aviod ladies with fake boobs or fake anything. I was told I was limiting myself, so. Tried a few. And yup, plastic boobs are a real turn off for me. Used to see a couple girls who were good, but not interested now that they have had surgery.
So guys who don't like tats should see girls with tats even though it's probably a turn off? You then state you don't see girls (again) with fake boobs because it's a turn off. Bit of a contradiction.
Casual observation, but it seems like it's far more common to see women with tattoos these days than men.
I strongly prefer tattoo free. I am fine with say 2 at max very small and discreet tattoos and definitely NOT on the breasts or chest. But the illustrated woman look that I see a lot these days is a turn off. No matter what. I wonder what the fuck possessed her to ruin her skin like that. I also wonder how much all that cost and I see it as a complete waste of money. This is only my personal preference. If a woman wants to tattoo herself up and down, knock yourself out. But be advised, it's still very much frowned on in the corporate / professional world.
I strongly prefer tattoo free. I am fine with say 2 at max very small and discreet tattoos and definitely NOT on the breasts or chest. But the illustrated woman look that I see a lot these days is a turn off. No matter what. I wonder what the fuck possessed her to ruin her skin like that. I also wonder how much all that cost and I see it as a complete waste of money. This is only my personal preference. If a woman wants to tattoo herself up and down, knock yourself out. But be advised, it's still very much frowned on in the corporate / professional world.
In the corporate or professional world, you wouldn't know about tattoos for men or women as both dress professionally and cover up their bodies. One will only notice if they are on the face, neck, or lower legs if a skirt or short dress is being worn. Even most women wear suits, jackets, sweaters or full arm-covering dresses/clothes. I'm sure the wise ones tailor their outfit choices though to avoid tattoo detection. I have seen a few people though who have non-ear piercings (or multiple ear piercings though) so I would think that's more likely frowned upon.
I'm the exact opposite lol. Hate piercings, love tats. As long as they're well done tattoos, the more the better.
The only tattoos I don’t like are the random, quasi-clip art ones. If you’re putting it on your skin, it should be something you drew, or something an artist you respect drew. Just my opinion though. It’s rarer and rarer to find Caucasian young women without ink though.
Oh, and also, the generic lower back designs (“tramp stamps”) that used to be popular REALLY haven’t aged well.
Oh, and also, the generic lower back designs (“tramp stamps”) that used to be popular REALLY haven’t aged well.
