It speaks volumes as regards mcluhans character that woody would stand in his defence.
The prosecution rests.
The prosecution rests.
Profiling Mcluhan
- Thread starter Mcluhan
- Start date
Hey hey Laddie,
Long time no babble!!!!!
If I knew you were dropping by, your name would have been added to that BLOWHARD LIST I compiled a couple posts up in this thread!
Heaven knows how you like to 'toot' Dubya's flute!......
Now be off with you Laddie. Go and pester bot!
Funny how you and your good-buddy bot (another fellow diver) 'check-in' here at TERB the SAME TIME TONNIGHT!!!!!
Too funny!!!!
Dam Laddie, stop on by my ranch
and we can circle Uranus some!!!
Long time no babble!!!!!
If I knew you were dropping by, your name would have been added to that BLOWHARD LIST I compiled a couple posts up in this thread!
Heaven knows how you like to 'toot' Dubya's flute!......
Now be off with you Laddie. Go and pester bot!
Funny how you and your good-buddy bot (another fellow diver) 'check-in' here at TERB the SAME TIME TONNIGHT!!!!!
Too funny!!!!
Dam Laddie, stop on by my ranch
and we can circle Uranus some!!!
WoodPeckr said:Hey hey Laddie,
Long time no babble!!!!!
If I knew you were dropping by, your name would have been added to that BLOWHARD LIST I compiled a couple posts up in this thread!
Heaven knows how you like to 'toot' Dubya's flute!......
Now be off with you Laddie. Go and pester bot!
Funny how you and your good-buddy bot (another fellow diver) 'check-in' here at TERB the SAME TIME TONNIGHT!!!!!
Too funny!!!!
Dam Laddie, stop on by my ranch
and we can circle Uranus some!!!
Thats all you've got?????????
I may be an ifiat (whatever that is), but I know a gentlemen when I see one. Macluhan is no gentlemen.WoodPeckr said:lfiat,
LOL!
You seem as befuddled as a Limbaugh lemming!
EVERYONE knows the best 'Blowhards & Fools' populate the 'right' side of the political spectrum.....El Rushblowhard Limbaugh, Faux news, Dubya, Cheney, Jesse Helms, Paul Wolfowitz, William Kristol, et al., ad nauseum.......
Mac, a gentelman and a scholar, in no way shares the shortcomings of those listed above......
I'm not surprised you rushed to his defence. You and he share a lot of the same shortcomings.
lookingforitallthetime = lfiat...lookingforitallthetime said:
You must be expert at shortcomings since you seem to back Dubya.......lookingforitallthetime said:
It must be a treat to live in your deluded world. A world where opinions and ideas are cast into 2 simple categories, pro or anti Bush. Because I have a difference of opinion than you on any topic, I must be pro Bush.WoodPeckr said:
The more I read your posts, the more disturbed I become that you were actually a school teacher at some point. Someone so delusional should not be allowed to have an impact on young minds.
Woody, for the 20th time, I DO NOT support Bush. If you can produce any evidence that demonstrates otherwise, I will gladlly concede that you are brilliant and Macluhan is a gentlemen.
I think for woody, the "you support bush" insult is just an updated version of the good ol' schoolyard comeback of last resort. "My dad can beat up your dad!" (while at the same time he complains about the "with us or against us" mentality)
basketcase said:
The thing you need to realize about Woody and his blank eyed pals is they feel they are enlightened. People who disagree with them are the great unwashed and uneducated. He reminds me of a history teacher I had who used to tell us the history books are wrong and he would tell us the real history.
Havn't you heard Woody's assessment of the military escalation in Vietnam? According to Woody, it's all Eisenhower's fault. He even skips the 3 years of the Kennedy administration!DonQuixote said:
I agree that 5 different historians can present 5 different versions, but Woody's version of Vietnam history is unique in exluding events that occurred between 1961 - 1963.
Calling yourself a student of history does not make you one.
LOL!!!!!lookingforitallthetime said:
Nice try Skippy trying to twist and reinterpret what I`ve said in the MM thread.
Here`s some clarification on that issue on post #41 of that thread:
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=1578955#post1578955
OH,
For the record it WAS Eisenhower that first got the US into VIET NAM....
WoodyWoodpecker said:LOL!!!!!
Nice try Skippy trying to twist and reinterpret what I`ve said in the MM thread.
Here`s some clarification on that issue on post #41 of that thread:
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=1578955#post1578955
OH,
For the record it WAS Eisenhower that first got the US into VIET NAM....
How does a thread posted today clarify history according to you???????
You must be getting a bit cross eyed looking down you nose at everyone.
That's right he did, with a few hundred military advisors to assist the Diem government's fight against the communists.WoodPeckr said:For the record it WAS Eisenhower that first got the US into VIET NAM....
Shucking the blame on LBJ who brought in conscription, carpet bombed North Vietnam and escalated troop levels to over 500,000 is irresponsible and foolish.
