Yes, that is why I asked to see the actual test result. It's not just the raw number (as you mentioned) but the trend.
Is it true that frequent orgasms cleans out the ducts (ducks) and that is a good thing?
PSA Test
- Thread starter Darts
- Start date
Is it true that frequent orgasms cleans out the ducts (ducks) and that is a good thing?
[QUOTE="
Is it true that frequent orgasms cleans out the ducts (ducks) and that is a good thing?
[/QUOTE]
I rather suspect that is an old wives tale! Have never seen any evidence of that and it’s 7 years since I was first diagnosed.
Is it true that frequent orgasms cleans out the ducts (ducks) and that is a good thing?
[/QUOTE]
I rather suspect that is an old wives tale! Have never seen any evidence of that and it’s 7 years since I was first diagnosed.
The following are some general guidelines to help you understand your PSA test results: 0 to 2.5 ng/mL is considered safe. 2.6 to 4 ng/mL is safe in most men but talk with your doctor about other risk factors. 4.0 to 10.0 ng/mL is suspicious and might suggest the possibility of prostate cancer.
Does it have to be a dick, or would the Violator4000 worn by a chick change the odds.
If you have sex 3 or 4 times .. you psa will be elevated. Mine had been 7 since 30's. Now i am taking serioulsy as getting ujp there in hte gage and familu hisotry of prostated canceer
www.healthline.com
High PSA, No Cancer: 8 Possible Causes
High PSA levels can mean many things. Prostate cancer, especially when caught early, is treatable. So are many of the other causes of elevated PSA.
www.healthline.com
My psa increased from 4.9 to 7.3 in less than a year. Went for a prostate biopsy, Gleason score of 7. I had an aggressive level of tumor for age 63. I chose brachytherapy procedure with 15 follow-up external beam radiation visits that finished in Jan. `21. The Durham region cancer center @ the hospital on Simcoe st. was superb. Take a look on the Mayo clinic...link you posted, for all the procedures and jargon I`ve mentioned. As always..talk to your Doc. or NP. Early detection is key, this is nothing to fuck about with ,saved my life.
Going in for a surgical biopsy on your prostate when it is unnecessary because of a false positive may better than cancer but it is hardly a picnic.
MRI scans are used more often nowadays. Perineal biopsies are more common nowadays and they are done using local anaesthetic with less chance of infection than the recital version.
False positive is a misnomer by the way, PSA tests are accurate and used properly can detect cancer early or show it’s caused by a large or infected prostate.
I had that biopsy. My Urologist inserted a small device up the back passage - sounded llke a staple gun - took 10-12 darts through the intestine wall into the prostate.
No local. No Tylenol. It was not painful - for my level tolerance - but a friend warned me: "Be ready for a surprise the next time you JO." Juice like lumpy catsup
I opted for extreme bracciatherapy, at Sunnybrook. The controlled "hi radiation inside the prostate" procedure Required epidural) + 15 conventional radiation sessions after work.
Cancer burned right out. No regrets but there is a price for everything. Nerve damage - punching tiny holes through the cable of nerves in my groin (Perineal insertion).
In hindsight - i should have done some endurance training BEFORE the treatment. I lost endurance - weight down 175 -.> 128 in 10 yrs.
But got what is important ... big O is intense, when I can get there - though it's 'dry' heeves (makes "cleanup easy," the girls kid me.
Not incontinent ... not irregular, great appetite ... hornier now than at 60
and .... I have discovered ... the respect, as an old man, that I generally receive from Asian women. Well ... you can't put a $$$ on it and I don't try to.
wa
Hope y'all have steady stomach reading this.
Last edited:
Wasabi, Captain Bly and I were discussing the RECITAL version, whereas I believe you are referring to the RECTAL procedure, unless of course you were singing an aria.
