Sexy Friends Toronto

Putin slams "American Exceptionalism" in NYT Op-Ed

afterhours

New member
Jul 14, 2009
6,319
4
0
Whenever any expertise on use of unconventional weapons on civilian population is required, who can be trusted more than the nation and the government that dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,479
12
38
What is American Exceptionalism?

The vast majority of the people of this world since the beginning of time have never known the kind of liberty and freedom that's taken for granted every day in this country. Most people have lived in abject fear of their leaders. Most people have lived in abject fear of whoever held power over them. Most people in the world have not had plentiful access to food and clean water. It was a major daily undertaking for most people to come up with just those two basic things.

Just surviving was the primary occupation of most people in the world. The history of the world is dictatorship, tyranny, subjugation, whatever you want to call it of populations -- and then along came the United States of America. Pilgrims were the first to come here seeking freedom from all of that. They were oppressed because of their religion. They were told they had to believe in the king and his god, whatever it was, or they would be imprisoned.

They led an exodus from Europe to this country, people of the same mind-set. They simply wanted to escape the tyranny of their ordinary lives. This country was founded that way. For the first time in human history, a government and country was founded on the belief that leaders serve the population. This country was the first in history, the EXCEPTION -- e-x-c-e-p-t, except. The exception to the rule is what American exceptionalism is.

It is because of this liberty and freedom that our country exists, because the founders recognized it comes from God. It's part of the natural yearning of the human spirit. It is not granted by a government. It's not granted by Putin. It's not granted by Obama or any other human being. We are created with the natural yearning to be free, and it is other men and leaders throughout human history who have suppressed that and imprisoned people for seeking it.

The US is the first time in the history of the world where a government was organized with a Constitution laying out the rules, that the individual was supreme and dominant, and that is what led to the US becoming the greatest country ever because it unleashed people to be the best they could be. Nothing like it had ever happened. That's American exceptionalism. Putin doesn't know what it is, Obama doesn't know what it is, and it just got trashed in the New York Times. It's just unacceptable.
Pasionate, but not supported by fact, and it would be clearer—and more polite—if you remembered you may be an American, but you're posting on a Canadian board. 'We' are Canucks.

The US Constitution was not the first ever, nor did it recognize the individual was supreme, although eventually, when the Bill of Rights was added one might read that in. But for more than a hundred years and certainly all through the slavery period, you'd be considered a wild-eyed radical loner if you did. Look up what the Haudenosonee have to say about Constitutions notably yours, Aristotle talks about the Athenian one in BC, and Mohammad promulgated one more than a millenium back, the usefulness of a document setting out the rules was obvious to many folks long before you guys took your territory away from the original inhabitants—who only had tribal rights in the rare instances when anyone cared that they had rights at all.

Pretty much everything in your Constitution appeared earlier in laws and writings about laws in Europe, where lots of folks lived peaceful, orderly prosperous lives without suffering oppression. And their water was as clean and plentiful, although why you mention that I cannot fathom, but it was a Brit in Britain who first twigged to town water as a disease spreader. Until they got the news from 'over home' wells and disease in America were just as poluted.

When your country behaves exceptionally then it will be entitled to the descriptor, as long as it continues to do so. There certainly have been times in the past when it seemed exceptional in the generous way it opened itself to receive the poor and dispossessed of the world. But only if one ignores the suffering, deprivation and oppression of its own black citizens at that same time. Sadly, from the outside these days your country more and more often looks like all others in the Wealthy West, but with the taste to use its power and the self-importance that makes bullies.

'Exceptional' is a very low standard, that even Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia could claim. We look to America for better.
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,773
0
0
It seems to me that the USA has dug its own hole... that is why it now stands practically alone.
At least the U.S. tried to stop Assad from chemical warfare while everybody else stood around doing nothing. Hence, the U.S. stands alone. Hence, the U.S. is exceptional.
 

afterhours

New member
Jul 14, 2009
6,319
4
0
At least the U.S. tried to stop Assad from chemical warfare while everybody else stood around doing nothing. Hence, the U.S. stands alone. Hence, the U.S. is exceptional.
In preparation for dropping an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, US military leaders had decided against a demonstration bomb, and they also decided against a special leaflet warning, in both cases because of the uncertainty of a successful detonation, and the wish to maximize psychological shock. No warning was given to Hiroshima that a new and much more destructive bomb was going to be dropped. The estimates of killed and wounded in Hiroshima are 150,000 and in Nagasaki 75,000.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,750
3
0
May I suggest to you The Revolution, the War of 1812, The American Civil War.

In the later-most case I will agree that many "Canadians" volunteered for the Union Army, however the British Government very much sympathized with the Confederacy. Indeed but for the lost "Special Order 191" the British Government - which means "Canada" would almost certainly have recognized the C.S.A.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,750
3
0
The estimates of killed and wounded in Hiroshima are 150,000 and in Nagasaki 75,000.
The estimates of just U.S. casualties in the invasion of the Japanese Home Islands were over one million.

May I suggest that if British Empire casualties were predicted at that level or Canadian casualties predicted at even half that level - you would be singing a very different tune!
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,773
0
0
In preparation for dropping an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, US military leaders had decided against a demonstration bomb, and they also decided against a special leaflet warning,
Ok, but do you agree that the U.S. is giving Assad more than ample warning this time? BTW: Here is one of my favourite photos from WW II.

The liberation of Singapore.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
The estimates of just U.S. casualties in the invasion of the Japanese Home Islands were over one million.

May I suggest that if British Empire casualties were predicted at that level or Canadian casualties predicted at even half that level - you would be singing a very different tune!
Those estimates are from Downfall which was obsoleted by the Russian entry into the war. That plan assumes no allied air bases close enough to Japan to provide fighter cover for bombers and for landing ships.

The Russian entry meant Japan's mainland territory would rapidly be captured creating allied air fields much closer to Japan. Downfall envisioned that land remaining under Japanese control until surrender.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,750
3
0
Those estimates are from Downfall which was obsoleted by the Russian entry into the war. That plan assumes no allied sure bases close enough to Japan right provide fighter cover for bombers and for landing ships.
Ee-i-ee-i-o

You've beaten this into the ground countless times, and everyone with any historical training disagrees with you.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Ee-i-ee-i-o

You've beaten this into the ground countless times, and everyone with any historical training disagrees with you.
Nope. You guys trumpeted a particular book last time, which I purchased from kindle abd proceeded to kick your butts with quotes from your own source.
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,773
0
0
Russian blood...
Even after the official surrender, units of the Japanese Imperial Army in Malaysia were still fighting to the death well into September 1945 and Malaysia is only one example. BTW: Russian blood is still human blood.

 

afterhours

New member
Jul 14, 2009
6,319
4
0
The estimates of just U.S. casualties in the invasion of the Japanese Home Islands were over one million.

May I suggest that if British Empire casualties were predicted at that level or Canadian casualties predicted at even half that level - you would be singing a very different tune!
Bombs could have been dropped at military targets, but the decision was made to maximize a psychological shock at the expense of civilian population.

Exceptionally well calculated decision to kill hundreds of thousands of civilians.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,750
3
0
Bombs could have been dropped at military targets, but the decision was made to maximize a psychological shock at the expense of civilian population.

Exceptionally well calculated decision to kill hundreds of thousands of civilians.
There are many historical and military, not to mention military-historical journals. Perhaps you would like to submit a peer reviewed article for publication?
 

Perry Mason

Well-known member
Aug 20, 2001
4,680
208
63
Here
Hey, let's not have a rehash of World War II... that is not the subject of this thread.

This thread is not about history (except for the lessons to be learned from it, of course) but about current events, what is happening today: the conundrum that the USA has got itself into because of hypocrisy and its failure to live up to a standard that it, itself, created.

I am not anti-American. On the contrary, I am a great admirer of the principles upon which it is founded... but which seem to be more honored today in their breach than their observance.

My concern is about integrity and honesty, which are at a very low ebb in the government of the USA... and I think it is a sad reflection upon the power and sway that the capitalists and the military/industrial complex exercise -- so much so that Washington DC has become a veritable quagmire.

Perry
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts