Fuck you are dense.
Okay smartypants, so tell me with all the sex-ed you can push on a single person, what would stop an angry boyfriend from filming him an undercover iPhone revenge sex-tape, and putting it online???
Is that the sole purpose of this new curriculum?
You didnt answer my question.
Your sig proverb is a total gram failure............it should read....
No you shouldn't. What our schools should care about though is what the Charter says. You can spew on about the thought police bullshit all you want but this has nothing to do with your paranoid conspiracy theories.
How many revenge porn cases were naked pics the girl sent or videos she agreed to be in? The curriculum sure would address those.
You missed the point of the movie. The point was he was encouraged to ACCEPT that he was not normal, and embrace it. Perhaps others who are not normal could be encouraged to do the same, rather than insisting on a distortion of the definition of normal?
No matter how much you hate it, the charter defines Canadian values and a publicly funded education system sure as shit should be teaching the values of the charter.
I haven't seen the movie, so I might well be missing its point. But you seem to have missed the point of the poor guy's motherfucking suicide. He killed himself precisely because he was living in a society that insisted on labelling him as abnormal and persecuting him for it. For you to use Turing as the poster child for treating homosexuality as "abnormal" is the most absurd bit of Orwelian doublethink I've seen since, well, the last big sleazy post I read. The mind boggles.
Your reputation for having a boggled mind precedes you. The movie doesn't say why he killed himself, and I doubt that anyone knows definitively, so you're just making that part up.
So far the only difference you have mentioned between homosexuals and heterosexuals is relative popularity. I'm just curious what those "…obvious differences between straight and gay people and their relationships" might be, to your way of thinking. The only ones that come to my addicted-to-the-obvious mind are the biological impossibility of natural reproduction, a likely redundancy of sex organs in one sort of relationship. But this is the XXIC.
Right! Anyone that would draw any sort of connection between him being prosecuted and convicted as a sexual deviant, as well as being subjected to forced chemical castration, and his killing himself is just clutching at straws. To think that any of that would speak to his state of mind or desire to end it all is absurd. No, no. The man killed himself because it seemed like a fun lark. Obviously. Those queers, always doing the silliest things!
aaaand, we're done. No, seriously. We're done. If you can't wrap your head around the fact that just about every motherfucking mammal on earth practices homosexuality to some extent or another, then you're too far gone to understand anything. But what's worse - if really need social Darwinism to explain and justify all human activity and behaviour, if the state of motherfucking nature is the only yardstick you accept of what is "normal", then we got no common ground. I don't even know where to begin. Fuck social Darwinism, it's bullshit. Fuck the wrongheaded fake dichotomy that views every fucking thing as either "normal" and natural or haram.
Sorry, not interested in silly games. Once the discussion devolves into that, I'm out.
It's your logic that's broken. One, comparing human sexuality to animal sexuality is a troubled comparison to begin with. I don't think we know enough about how animal and human thought processes compare to make that comparison. Is anal sex in the animal kingdom related to love/attraction or to dominance behaviour? I don't know, and I know you don't know either. Two, no comparison is relevant or required. We already know that homosexuality among people is a relatively rare occurrence. Three, even if homosexuality occurs in ALL animals, it is nevertheless NOT THE NORM, in the animal kingdom or otherwise. Or is it that you want to change the meaning of word "normal" to "natural"? Maybe that's the problem.
Catholic lens! Just another reason we DONT need two systems. Make it ONE system,if the Catholic kids parents want religion class offer it in their regular curriculum. Always thought religion was taught in/at CHURCH!
lol what?
