Report about Toronto terror threat being taken ‘very seriously,’ RCMP say

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
no what it really boils down to is it is reasonable to expect our leaders to apply risk mitigation and ensure their policies do not increase the risk for Canadian citizens.
"Risk mitigation" is being done. You are demanding risk elimination. You actually said that the policy would be proven wrong if EVEN ONE TERRORIST got through. That is not mitigation, that is you being a hysterical little girl and demanding the complete elimination of any risk whatsoever, because if ANY risk remains, is possible that ONE terrorist will get through.

Your chickenshit words are there for all to see.
 

SkyRider

Banned
Mar 31, 2009
17,550
2
0
Guys, can we declare a time-out on these my testicles are bigger than yours posts for a while?

Actually, can we declare a moratorium on any threads/posts about Muslims for the next 24-48 hours?
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
18,795
4,248
113
fuji;5424232[QUOTE said:
]"Risk mitigation" is being done.
No it is not
They are working towards specific numbers by specific timelines
Proper risk mitigation would be to allow the screen process to dictate the schedule

You are demanding risk elimination. You actually said that the policy would be proven wrong if EVEN ONE TERRORIST got through.
Well if zero-tolerance is the goal wrt to drinking and driving , then zero tolerance should be the goal wrt importing terrorists

That is not mitigation,
Yes it is

that is you being a hysterical little girl
Fuji the fool

and demanding the complete elimination of any risk whatsoever, because if ANY risk remains, is possible that ONE terrorist will get through.
And if just one does get through Justin will have to accept the responsibility for whatever damage is done

Your chickenshit words are there for all to see.
Says the man living in a different country
You are a real POS

Your character have made your words worthless
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts