Revealed: How the five wealthiest Gulf Nations have so far refused to take a refugee

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,410
2,832
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
so much for "Arab Unity"







More than four million Syrians have been forced to escape the never-ending civil war ravaging their country and the barbaric terror group carving a bloody trail across the Middle East.

The vast majority live in overcrowded refugee camps in Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt and Iraq - all under threat from ISIS - and record numbers are making the perilously long journey to Europe.

Yet, as debate rages between politicians in Europe over how many they should take, nearby super-wealthy Gulf nations of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain have refused to offer sanctuary to a single Syrian refugee.

Amnesty International's Head of Refugee and Migrants' Rights, Sherif Elsayid-Ali, described their inaction as 'shameful'.
He said: 'The records of Gulf countries is absolutely appalling, in terms of actually showing compassion and sharing the responsibility of this crisis... It is a disgrace.'

Left with nothing, these refugees travel thousands of miles from the Middle East, through central Europe and across the Mediterranean to reach countries like Germany and Austria.

Others have tried to sneak on boats, trains and trucks crossing the Channel to the UK.
Almost 3,000 have died trying to reach Europe by sea this year, but hundreds more attempt the same life-threatening journey with their babies and young children every single night.

The tragic death of three-year-old Aylan Kurdi who drowned trying to reach the Greek island of Kos from Bodrum, Turkey, inspired a seismic shift in the European attitude towards the 313,000 people who have reached the continent this year.

None have been allowed to enter the (relatively) nearby Gulf nations, who all rank in the world's top 50 GDPs and have a combined military budget of more than £65billion, according to Arab expert Sultan Sooud al-Qassemi.

He said: 'The Gulf must realise that now is the time to change their policy regarding accepting refugees from the Syria crisis. It is the moral, ethical and responsible step to take.'

None of the Gulf countries signed the 1951 Refugee Convention which defines a refugee 'outside the country of his nationality' because of 'fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality'.
Syrians can still apply for 'costly' tourist visas and work permits to enter wealthier Gulf nations but they are rarely granted, according to the BBC.


Gulf nations argue that accepting large numbers of Syrian refugees is a serious threat to the safety of its citizens because terrorists could hide themselves among civilians.
They have donated large sums of money to help homeless refugees. According to ReliefWeb, the UAE has funded an entire refugee camp in Jordan which shelters tens of thousands of Syrians.

Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia and Qatar have donated funds, food, shelter and clothing to Syrias in Lebanon, Turkey and Jordan.

In total, the Gulf states are thought to have given over £589m to the aid effort - but it is four times less than the United States has.

The UK has given £918million to help deal with the impact of violence in Syria and Prime Minister David Cameron today announced Britain is increasing its aid for refugees to more than £1billion.

Britain's contribution is more than Saudi Arabia's £387million , UAE's £359million and Qatar's £157,000 combined.
The Gulf region 'has the capacity to quickly build housing for the refugees,' according to the Managing Editor of the Quartz news website, Bobby Ghosh.


He wrote: 'The giant construction companies that have built the gleaming towers of Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Riyadh should be contracted to create shelters for the influx.
'Saudi Arabia has plenty of expertise at managing large numbers of arrivals... There's no reason all this knowhow can't be put to humanitarian use.'

The majority of Syrian refugees have been taken in by Middle Eastern countries. Around 1.9million live in Turkish refugee camps, 1.1million in Lebanon, 629,000 in Jordan, 249,000 in northern Iraq and Egypt has housed 132,000, according to the United Nations.

But there was a massive surge in those trying to reach Europe this year and asylum applications had topped 300,000 by early August.

More than 89,000 were from Germany, which expects to take in more than 800,000 refugees from all over the world this year, and 62,000 for Sweden.
The UK has promised to rehome 'thousands', said Prime Minister David Cameron, who only this week claimed accepting more people was not the simple answer to the crisis.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...used-single-Syrian-refugee.html#ixzz3ktQ3ZNjk
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 

SkyRider

Banned
Mar 31, 2009
17,557
2
0
Gulf nations argue that accepting large numbers of Syrian refugees is a serious threat to the safety of its citizens because terrorists could hide themselves among civilians.
Western countries don't worry about terrorists. Who would want to harm us?
 

Hard Idle

Active member
Jan 15, 2005
4,957
23
38
North York
Apparently the wealthy Gulf states feel they have contributed enough by opening their territory to Islamist militias to conduct training, recruitment, fundraising and transportation of weapons.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,966
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
why should they shoulder a burden that was caused by the west?
The West did not cause the Syrian civil war.

But in answer to your question, assuming that one of the gulf states was truly uninvolved (unlikely) the answer is that refugees are not something you take as punishment, but because you care about your fellow human being.

In this case we can see that gulf states don't give a shit about the welfare of their fellow Arab human beings. Let us never again hear from them that they are taking any position out of concern for other Arabs.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
96,790
25,124
113
In this case we can see that gulf states don't give a shit about the welfare of their fellow Arab human beings. Let us never again hear from them that they are taking any position out of concern for other Arabs.
Why is it that you complain about gulf states but ignore one of Syria's biggest neighbours, who had been doing the favour of taking care of some of Israel's refugees for nearly half a century?
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,966
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Why is it that you complain about gulf states but ignore one of Syria's biggest neighbours, who had been doing the favour of taking care of some of Israel's refugees for nearly half a century?
Israel is not a suitable country for Arab refugees, given the history of anti Israeli violence by Arabs. Don't be fucking stupid.

Canada is a great country for these people. I believe Syria's loss should be Canada's gain. These are not economic refugees, they are hard working regular people who will benefit whatever country they wind up in.

The Gulf States are idiotic dictatorships not interested in helping anyone, they exist solely to enrich the dictatorships that tyrannize them.

Also saying that Syria is doing a favor to anyone by hosting refugees from an illegal war of aggression THAT SYRIA STARTED is pathetic. In any case Israel already took in 700,000 refugees from that conflict.
 

SkyRider

Banned
Mar 31, 2009
17,557
2
0
they are hard working regular people who will benefit whatever country they wind up in.
So, what skills, talents, positive attributes, etc. do they bring to the table. (We know that Somali refugees became excellent self-employed drug dears. Rob Ford's favorites. They even took a video of Rob.)
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
96,790
25,124
113
Israel is not a suitable country for Arab refugees, given the history of anti Israeli violence by Arabs. Don't be fucking stupid.
If Israel honoured their duty and allowed the return of Palestinian refugees it would go a long way to helping shed the image of a country filled with hate and paranoia.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,966
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
If Israel honoured their duty and allowed the return of Palestinian refugees it would go a long way to helping shed the image of a country filled with hate and paranoia.
Again, Israel took in 700,000 refugees from that conflict already, a conflict SYRIA WAS TO BLAME FOR.

In any case the present thread is why the Gulf States haven't stepped up. Particularly as this is really a proxy war between Iran and Saudi Arabia, you would expect them both to offer to take refugees.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,966
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
So, what skills, talents, positive attributes, etc. do they bring to the table. (We know that Somali refugees became excellent self-employed drug dears. Rob Ford's favorites. They even took a video of Rob.)
Young, hard working, good people. Like most immigrants to Canada historically.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
24,507
2,605
113
The West did not cause the Syrian civil war.

But in answer to your question, assuming that one of the gulf states was truly uninvolved (unlikely) the answer is that refugees are not something you take as punishment, but because you care about your fellow human being.

In this case we can see that gulf states don't give a shit about the welfare of their fellow Arab human beings. Let us never again hear from them that they are taking any position out of concern for other Arabs.
Of course they caused it. The US supports all kinds of anti-Assad groups. Without western support the rebels would have been wiped out by Assad a long time ago. Instead the war grinds on and has morphed into a proxy war between Russia and Iran vs The USA and its allies. Same with all the chaos cause in Libya and the wave of refugees that has caused as well as the effect of the US attack on Iraq that still grinds on with the civil war in Iraq. Yes the war Fuji claims was a success. lol. what a joke. 8 trillion and counting. I think this is far to well orchestrated to be an "accident" the fact is Western Europe needs those refugees. Causing a war is a guarantee that the best and brightest will leave, for the simple reason that the others simply cannot. You will get a bit of grit with the cream, but those can be street sweepers etc etc.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,966
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
All the neighbouring countries ( Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey and even Iraq ) accepted millions of syrian refugees except Israel. Israel is a direct neighbour and accepted zero syrian refugees so far, why ? If it has room to accept millions of jewish immigrants worldwide , I'm pretty sure it can settle few thousands Syrian refugees.
If you can't figure out why after 75 years of Arabs trying to annihilate Israel, Israel isn't going to allow itself to be overrun by Arabs, then you have the IQ of a soap dish.

Israel provides full citizenship and equality to all its citizens, but at the same time the ethnic cleansing of Jews is prevented by Israel remaining a Jewish majority state.

That is reality.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,552
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,966
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Isn't that racist? Reminds me of Australia's white policy many years ago...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Australia_policy
Nope. See my reply to go west. The reality is that every Arab majority state has violently ethnically cleansed itself of Jews. In such a context it is racist to push for things that will let to such an ethnic cleansing.

Same reason why you wouldn't overrun Kosovo or Bosnia with Serbian refugees.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
96,790
25,124
113
Israel provides full citizenship and equality to all its citizens, but at the same time the ethnic cleansing of Jews is prevented by Israel remaining a Jewish majority state.

That is reality.
Paranoia and hate used to justify racist policies that breed more paranoia and hate.

Israel refuses to give Palestinians either equal rights or to give them their land back.
That's what's breeding hate.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,966
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
So do you agree with Slovakia policy whose government said they will allow Syrians as refugees only if they are Christians
I am not familiar with Slovakia's situation. Are they meaningfully threatened by ethnic cleansing at the hands of those they propose to keep out?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,644
7,076
113
Note that Saudi, Jordan, Lebanon, or the Gulf state countries are not signatories to the UN Convention on refugees so at least they're being consistent.

As for Israel, Syria is still officially at war with Israel. It makes no sense to accept refugees from a hostile country.

But of course, it is noticeable that the usual suspects chose to shift the topic to Israel instead of daring to criticize the Gulf states.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,966
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
No but because they want to keep the country 99% white christian as it is now
So if I understand correctly they were at no risk of being ethnically cleansed by Arabs. They don't face any existential threat from neighboring Arab militaries nor from Arab immigration, so they are just racists.

In the case of Israel clearly they are surrounded by Arab populations that wish to annihilate and ethnically cleanse them. If Israel ceased being Jewish majority the result would be the ethnic cleansing and annihilation of the Jews there. So they have an existential reason to preserve and grow that Jewish majority, since their actual survival depends on it.
 

SkyRider

Banned
Mar 31, 2009
17,557
2
0
Can the Islamic Gulf States be accused of racism when they reject Muslim refugees? Or, can only Christians be accused of racism?
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts