This website has a variety of forums with reviews for SPs and MPs being at the core of it.
Hobbyists post their reviews and community gets a sense of what's what.
Some SPs also participate with most staying in the shadows and simply peeking in once in a while.
Best case scenario is when there's a great review by OP and SP reciprocates by positive feedback.
There are cases where OP is completely out of line and SP sheds some light on the situation.
Now imagine a scenario where SP responds to a review and puts validity of that review into question or replies that OP's less than stellar experience was his own fault. Would you feel weird defending own review?
What's your take? I'd love to hear from both sides.
Hobbyists post their reviews and community gets a sense of what's what.
Some SPs also participate with most staying in the shadows and simply peeking in once in a while.
Best case scenario is when there's a great review by OP and SP reciprocates by positive feedback.
There are cases where OP is completely out of line and SP sheds some light on the situation.
Now imagine a scenario where SP responds to a review and puts validity of that review into question or replies that OP's less than stellar experience was his own fault. Would you feel weird defending own review?
What's your take? I'd love to hear from both sides.