Here we go again, someone who knows so little about the British monarchy. Inbreeding? In modern times? How so? Give us your basis for this claim.Who cares, they are a bunch of inbred jackasses anyway out of touch with the world.
I totally agree! That is a perfect summary of the Royals!Who cares, they are a bunch of inbred jackasses anyway out of touch with the world.
further, apparently s/he can marry whomever s/he wants regardless of background. black...muslim...asian king/queen of england?first born - male or female allowed to be king/queen.
whats there to say.finally or who cares?
But depending on that person's religion, they cannot be made a monarch.further, apparently s/he can marry whomever s/he wants regardless of background. black...muslim...asian king/queen of england?
It is some way from being a "done deal."royal succession first born - male or female allowed to be king/queen.
This is more complicated than Prime Minister Cameron wants to make it out to be. Canon 1125 of the current 1983 Roman Catholic Code of Canon Law requires the Roman Catholic party to promise sincerely to do all in their power to ensure that any children of the marriage will be baptized and raised as Roman Catholics. So now we have the options of the Roman Catholic party deciding to be received into the Church of England before the marriage (look at the criticism from Roman circles of Autumn Philips decision to do so), or the specter of a future Sovereign raised Roman Catholic who now refuses to be received into the Church of England before their Coronation as required by law.further, apparently s/he can marry whomever s/he wants regardless of background.
They're lucky that Harry isn't the oldest brother, he doesn't have any royal blood as the offspring of Diana and James Hewitt.
![]()
One slight problem with this scurrilous and hurtful story is that Captain Hewitt, didn't even meet the late Princess of Wales until after Prince Harry was born!They're lucky that Harry isn't the oldest brother, he doesn't have any royal blood as the offspring of Diana and James Hewitt.
How's that?I go out on a limb and say this is more proof how the royal family wants more control.
What does Roman Catholic Code have to do with this ?This is more complicated than Prime Minister Cameron wants to make it out to be. Canon 1125 of the current 1983 Roman Catholic Code of Canon Law requires the Roman Catholic party to promise sincerely to do all in their power to ensure that any children of the marriage will be baptized and raised as Roman Catholics. So now we have the options of the Roman Catholic party deciding to be received into the Church of England before the marriage (look at the criticism from Roman circles of Autumn Philips decision to do so), or the specter of a future Sovereign raised Roman Catholic who now refuses to be received into the Church of England before their Coronation as required by law.
This is just plain not well thought out.
Yes, we inherited an accumulated mess ...... Wasn't for them we would not be here right now.
This Mervyn:What does Roman Catholic Code have to do with this ?
"Mr Cameron, who hosted the meeting, said: 'Nor does it make any sense that a potential monarch can marry someone of any faith other than [Roman] Catholic. The thinking behind these rules is wrong. That’s why people have been talking about changing them for some time. We need to get on and do it.’ The removal of the barrier to the heir to the throne marrying a [Roman] Catholic does not affect the position of the Anglican Church as the established Church.
The Queen and future monarchs will be Anglicans and Supreme Governor of the Church of England.
the Government will introduce legislation to change the 1701 Act of Settlement, the Bill of Rights 1688, the Coronation Oath Act 1688 and the Royal Marriages Act 1772."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...storic-change-sex-equality.html#ixzz1c7DE6G78