Allure Massage

Russia Has Not Seen Such Amassing of Hostile Military Forces on Its Borders since 194

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
47,022
5,615
113
Russia Has Not Seen Such Amassing of Hostile Military Forces on Its Borders since 1941


Global Research, May 22, 2016

Sputnik News 21 May 2016

Russia has not seen such a major military buildup close to its borders since 1941 when the Third Reich sent the Wehrmacht to conquer the Soviet Union, Professor Stephen F. Cohen said in his recent interview on The John Batchelor Show, referring to NATO’s increasingly assertive strategy in Eastern Europe and the Baltics.

“We have been watching for nearly a month a steady buildup of American and NATO forces along near Russia’s borders – on land, on sea and in the air,” he said. “There has been nothing like this on Russia’s borders, such an amassing of hostile military force, since the German invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941.”

Russia has been concerned with NATO’s overall strategy and its recent moves particularly. Last week the US completed its first land-based component of the Aegis missile shield at an air base near Deveselu, Romania. A day later, the alliance held a groundbreaking ceremony in Poland. The Aegis Ashore base is scheduled to be deployed in Redzikowo by 2018.Moscow has warned that the system could be detrimental for global peace and stability. NATO officials have tried to alleviate Russian concerns by saying that the Aegis system is purely defensive, but Cohen warned that it the complex could be used for other purposes.


US Deputy Secretary of Defence Bob Work (C), Polish Minister of Defence Antoni Macierewicz (3rdR), Polish Foreign Affairs Minister Witold Waszczykowski (2ndR) and other officials take part in ground breaking ceremony of the northern section of defence anti-missile shield in Redzikowo military base in northern Poland

“Somebody said that the only defensive weapon in military history is a foxhole; everything else could be used for offensive purposes. [NATO's missile defense system] could be used for offensive purposes. They can launch cruise missiles,” he observed.


The US Army Corps of Engineers Europe District is managing the construction of a $134 million Aegis Ashore Missile Defense Complex in Deveselu, Romania

‘It’s Amazing’ That No NATO Member Opposes US Missile Shield in Europe


Russian officials and experts have also questioned whether it was reasonable to build a shield that is supposed to protect the West against Iran’s ballistic missiles considering that Tehran does not pose any threat to its neighbors and beyond.

The Islamic Republic is not the real target. “The majority of our missile defense installations … are directed at Russia. They are not directed at Iran, that’s a fairytale. The government puts it out, but nobody believes it,” the analyst noted.

U.S servicemen drive their armored vehicles at the opening ceremony of U.S, British and Georgian troops joint military exercises at the Vaziani military base outside Tbilisi, Georgia, Wednesday, May 11, 2016.
U.S servicemen drive their armored vehicles at the opening ceremony of U.S, British and Georgian troops joint military exercises at the Vaziani military base outside Tbilisi, Georgia, Wednesday, May 11, 2016. © AP Photo/ Shakh Aivazov

Professor Cohen has long warned that Washington’s policies towards Russia have been the key reason for the recent cold spell in relations between the two global powers. This trend appears to be getting more dangerous.

“Are we sleepwalking towards an actual war with Russia or is this a plan to provoke a war with Russia?” he asked. “If we are sleepwalking, we all need to yell, ‘Wake up!’ If they actually now would not mind a war with Russia, then they are crazy. Because there is no way if there is war with Russia on Russia’s borders that eventually some kind of nuclear weapons will not come into play.”
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,550
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
I do agree that the US focus on Euro security is misplaced.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,571
6,768
113
I do agree that the US focus on Euro security is misplaced.
US is the brain and the backbone of NATO. The Eastern European members of the alliance are nervous about Putin's adventurism to which America must respond even if only to reassure the threatened allies. As for the claim in the title of the article- bull shit.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,644
7,076
113
If Russia's borders didn't keep expanding...


At least dan checked to make sure this article wasn't from an 'Onion" type source.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,550
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
US is the brain and the backbone of NATO. The Eastern European members of the alliance are nervous about Putin's adventurism to which America must respond even if only to reassure the threatened allies. As for the claim in the title of the article- bull shit.
Or the US could pivot East where the future is and let old Europe stay on holiday....

I don't see the rational behind the US belonging to NATO other than the Euros showed themselves unfit to keep the peace.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,761
3
0
Russia has not seen such a major military buildup close to its borders since 1941 when the Third Reich sent the Wehrmacht to conquer the Soviet Union, Professor Stephen F. Cohen said in his recent interview on The John Batchelor Show. . .
However, the NATO build up amounts to five battalions (a Brigade), do you and Professor Cohen seriously believe that the Commanding General of the 20th Guards Army regards five battalions as more than a tripwire?


Five battalions is one Devil of a long way from three army groups!
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
24,426
2,557
113
The US deploying heavy armor in Georgia is downright insane. They are pretty much assuring the invasion of Georgia at some later date. If Georgia is willing to declare it will be some launching point for an attack on Russia, it makes sense for Russia to eliminate the threat. Be aware there is a hostile situation that still exists in Georgia. Funny that the US would put the ABM stations in Romania and Poland, I guess no one will really care if those countries get nuked.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,550
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
The US deploying heavy armor in Georgia is downright insane. They are pretty much assuring the invasion of Georgia at some later date. If Georgia is willing to declare it will be some launching point for an attack on Russia, it makes sense for Russia to eliminate the threat. Be aware there is a hostile situation that still exists in Georgia. Funny that the US would put the ABM stations in Romania and Poland, I guess no one will really care if those countries get nuked.
They are simply a trip wire as Adri said, Russia would never dare attack a US military position. They know more than anyone what a potato fermenting second rate power they are.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,571
6,768
113
However, the NATO build up amounts to five battalions (a Brigade), do you and Professor Cohen seriously believe that the Commanding General of the 20th Guards Army regards five battalions as more than a tripwire?


Five battalions is one Devil of a long way from three army groups!
That's roughly 4k men. That's not even a symbolic "build up".
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
24,426
2,557
113
They are simply a trip wire as Adri said, Russia would never dare attack a US military position. They know more than anyone what a potato fermenting second rate power they are.
Of course they won't. They will take it after the Americans leave using proxies.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,550
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,644
7,076
113
The US deploying heavy armor in Georgia is downright insane. They are pretty much assuring the invasion of Georgia at some later date. If Georgia is willing to declare it will be some launching point for an attack on Russia, it makes sense for Russia to eliminate the threat. Be aware there is a hostile situation that still exists in Georgia. Funny that the US would put the ABM stations in Romania and Poland, I guess no one will really care if those countries get nuked.
As usual your are simply parroting Putin's propaganda. If the independent nation of Georgia (or the Ukraine) wants to invite NATO in they can. Suggesting that Russia uses this as a pretext for for invasion is pathetic. There is absolutely zero chance of a NATO invasion of Russia. Meanwhile Russia has repeatedly shown the willingness to invade former Soviet states that disagree with them.

And suggesting that ABM units pose a threat to Russia is asinine.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
80,205
104,367
113
Cohen is a notorious Kremlin mouthpiece and general creep. I'm sure he's picking up his paycheck as we write.... probably in nice, solid dollars rather than worthless Putin-rubles.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
24,426
2,557
113
As usual your are simply parroting Putin's propaganda. If the independent nation of Georgia (or the Ukraine) wants to invite NATO in they can. Suggesting that Russia uses this as a pretext for for invasion is pathetic. There is absolutely zero chance of a NATO invasion of Russia. Meanwhile Russia has repeatedly shown the willingness to invade former Soviet states that disagree with them.

And suggesting that ABM units pose a threat to Russia is asinine.
What happened when Cuba invited Russia to install some missiles? If ABM do not pose a threat, why did the USA seek and sign the ABM treaty with Russia in the first place? I think you have proven you foggy thoughts are asinine.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,761
3
0
ABM batteries in Romania and Poland, have little value against ICBM's launched by Russia at North America. On the other hand they have great value against ballistic missiles launched by states such as Iran or Pakistan against the Continent and/or the U.K.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,644
7,076
113
What happened when Cuba invited Russia to install some missiles? If ABM do not pose a threat, why did the USA seek and sign the ABM treaty with Russia in the first place? I think you have proven you foggy thoughts are asinine.
The Cuban Missile Crisis was about NUCLEAR missiles but sure, go ahead and pretend like technology to shoot down missiles is a similar threat.
 
Toronto Escorts