I concur with your premise wholeheartedly. I attended graduate school in Michigan over thirty years ago. For many of the graduate courses, undergraduates shared the program. At that time, affirmative action was ongoing in admissions. I had black and Hispanic individuals in my class that had no business being there. Many could not keep up with the cirriculum even though it was dumbed down by the faculty. Over the period of the term, these students generally dropped out. To salve the egos of the liberals, the minority students were sacrificed as guinea pigs. Their despair and angst in class seemed not to be not a consideration for the elitist liberals.You need to understand that this proposal has got this far by educators who have some influence. There are liberal academians who have floated such ideas on American universities.
Why? I'm guessing because STEM education and proficiency contributes to so much wealth differential around the world. If certain minority groups consistently achieve less on objective* math tests even when all the factors are similar, this erodes the incessant white privilege argument. Meanwhile, Asian students in North America (and back in Asia) just dig into the books and kick-ass. They don't give a shit that Albert Einstein was a white European.
*Anecdote: The American university I graduated from quite awhile back had a very aggressive affirmative action admissions program. These students were usually at the bottom of the grading curve in courses with a foundation in math of which there are many. The professors in the liberal arts classes with subjective grading took it upon themselves to enlist a noticeable two track grading system to help the minority students.
I still believe that affirmative action is horseshit and took a toll on certain minority students. They were totally inept and incompetent to keep up with their studies






