Sog

[os2hoppy]

Do you guys consider a BJ a SOG ?

I have read and inquired about several escorts and I have heard reference to one SOG for a session. I would consider an SOG to be only on penetration - BJ does not count.

Opinions ?

I am thinking of Sherry from Honeygirls but am weary of a single SOG that includes a BJ - I am always looking for a BJTC and then some more action.

 

[bebe]

Q: Do you guys consider a BJ a SOG ?


My Answer: Why would it not be? You get to shoot your load.

 

[os2hoppy]

I only ask because I see some people referring to a single SOG but then the SP has provided a BJTC and more service after.

Then of course I call the goal to shoot at more than the mouth ;-)

 

[Gentle Ben]

most definate ,a BJ/TC is 1 SOG

 

[ToronToto]

Think, if BJTC didn't count as a SOG, then one could have several rounds of intercourse, and end each round with a BJ TC. I doubt the single SOG ladies would comply to your theory.

 

[yychobbyist]

Absolutely. But if you and your Sp disagree, remember you can always stick the used condom in her pocket after the session to protest.

 

[kramer]

Do you guys consider a BJ a SOG ?

As Bill might say:

"It depends what your definition of "a" is?"

 

[os2hoppy]

Thanks for the opinions (and thanks to the mod that moved this to a more appropriate forum - you guys do a great job).

ToronToto - sounds like you have thought of the possibilities. In a short session of an hour to an hour and a half, it might be hard to accomplish that ;-) But my intent was to say that if you started off with a BJ and finished as opposed to starting off with FS and finished, would it be reasonable to desire another SOG in the session ? That is what I desire (a BJTC and then FSTC) - I will be sure to be clear on that when asking for a visit.

yychobbyist - ewww..... I will remember that trick !

Thanks again for the opinions guys.

 

[great bear]

I have always considered a bj to be quite similar to hitting the cross post in hockey.

 

[Cardinal Fang]

Depending on how the BJTC is done it could be considered "icing."

*Looks around*

What?

 

[great bear]

There are some who consider a BJTC necessary when there have been too many men in the box.

 

[Spode]

who consider a BJTC necessary

That's BBBJTC PAL!!!

 

[great bear]

That's BBBJTC PAL!!!

Ahh Spode, I see you remember when only the orginal six played in the NHL