No black / no brown clients. We see this on ads often. There are a lot of escorts joining the woke brigade this time. Wanted to use the opportunity to bump an old topic of ours. Do We still think escorts have a right to chose or do We now think that it's just racist as f.
Sp client preference
- Thread starter Damnthealiens
- Start date
Yeah a lot of the ones virtue signalling right now have their own preferences, sure, but I don't care. I don't see them as "racist", that's a strong word. They have their own preferences just like us. I refuse to see girls I don't find visually appealing, doesn't mean I have anything against them.
escorts who refuse to see black clients have no business joining anti racist movements or any anti-hate movements.
Exactly, the kind of quotes I am seeing on sp social media profiles is surprising to say the least. Most dont have a business joining the movement.
@swfiend I dont think that's a fair analogy. You have apreference for girls of certain ethnicity because that entices. SP are providers. If you are telling me that they are ok to be with an ugly fat white guy over a black dude, thats making it worse!
Wait are you saying white girls not dating black and brown guys is ok due to personal preference and has no elements of racism?
Yes. I get to choose who I want to see be it white, black, brown, yellow, pink, blue and so should anyone thinking of engaging in an intimate act. This also goes for a transexual. My body my choice, their body their choice.
Lets flip the situation. A WOC sex worker claims she doesn't want to see anyone who is E.Indian or Asian, Is this racist?
No matter how many threads have been posted regarding this subject, and there really have been a lot, imho it's still "her body, her life, her choice".
Sometimes the lady may actually be racist, and if so, given the intimate nature of what she has to do with clients, so be it.
Sometimes she just may have had bad experiences with some members of specific ethnicities, and unfortunately the few spoiled it for the many. Or sometimes she may not want to see a client with the same ethnicity as hers, either just in principle, or in fear of being recognized and outed.
Or maybe she has a client "too young" or "too old" restriction, which may be considered ageist.
I think that as long as her restrictions are made known up front, so nobody is rejected at the door, she is entitled to them.
Sometimes the lady may actually be racist, and if so, given the intimate nature of what she has to do with clients, so be it.
Sometimes she just may have had bad experiences with some members of specific ethnicities, and unfortunately the few spoiled it for the many. Or sometimes she may not want to see a client with the same ethnicity as hers, either just in principle, or in fear of being recognized and outed.
Or maybe she has a client "too young" or "too old" restriction, which may be considered ageist.
I think that as long as her restrictions are made known up front, so nobody is rejected at the door, she is entitled to them.
Of course it probably has elements of racism, either in her own belief, or her family and friends' beliefs, or her religion's beliefs, etc. But she is entitled to that, as are we all.
However, in a non-intimate setting, and certainly in general society as a whole, I don't believe racism should enter the picture at all, even though I know it does. We still have a long way to go, and pretty much all humans have a "tribal" instinct. It's been that way since the beginning of human history.
Imagine you were a film actor would you
want to do a steamy sex scene with some ugly
fat white guy instead of some hot chick of
your choosing. People in service industry outside
escorting do have their preferences. They just
don't have the same freedom of choice escorts do.
Again, sometimes the few spoil it for the many. I've met quite a few SP's who won't see black clients because of a few bad experiences. Too rough, too big, or trying to become their pimp. After a few too many of those experiences some have banned black clients. In some cases they may have black boyfriends, who treat them just fine and make them happy, but that does not erase their fear of having another bad experience with an unknown black client.
It doesn't mean that the lady can't sympathize with the plight of blacks and other mistreated ethnicities, and support their causes.
Shocking eh? Yes preferences are preferences. Litigating intimate preferences is for sci-fi totalitarian states.
Stupidest question on Terb. Ever.
For everyone who says that few ruined for all, that is the core issue. Stereotyping an entire community for few people is exactly what racism is. I guess the point is all of us are inherently racist in our private space but the masks come on when we come out. The problem with this is that you cannot mask out your subconscious. The police man did not think that Floyd is a Blackman before acting as Such, it was just so deeply ground in his subconscious that it triggered the reaction. The act of fixing the subconscious is something that can only be done once we acknowledge it at our private settings.
At the end of the day does all these rioting and protesting rally matter when all of us are going to go back to seeing color as a differentiator explicitly or implicitly in any setting.
At the end of the day does all these rioting and protesting rally matter when all of us are going to go back to seeing color as a differentiator explicitly or implicitly in any setting.
Exactly. What about RMTs? What about nurses? What about doctors? They do have close contacts with patients, and, sometime, do have to touch the genitals (e.g., vasectomy). Can a white female surgeon refuse to do vasectomy to black guy? How about white female nurse that needs to do a sponge bath to black guy? Acrobats? Dancers? It is cutting pretty close to the basic MP services: touches in the same area. The only difference is sexual arouse by the client, but who knows what is going on in that 80 y.o. black dude in a nursing home when a nice 30 y.o. white nurse is taking care of him?
Let's turn this......
If you refuse to see a trans SW and let her fuck you in the ass does that make you Transphobic?
Or pay a Gay male SW to suck your cock are you a homophobe?
Ya, that's what I thought. It's sex, it's a different standard. And there isn't a law, human rights tribunal or any body that will make one human being have transactional sex with another.
It's about as close to incel behavior as it gets. Foremost SWsvare people. Deal with it.
If you refuse to see a trans SW and let her fuck you in the ass does that make you Transphobic?
Or pay a Gay male SW to suck your cock are you a homophobe?
Ya, that's what I thought. It's sex, it's a different standard. And there isn't a law, human rights tribunal or any body that will make one human being have transactional sex with another.
It's about as close to incel behavior as it gets. Foremost SWsvare people. Deal with it.
