Time to remind you which side you should be on. You benefit from living under the protection western society...but love to hate it. Why not move to a country that better suits you?
Of course your military argument falls apart upon the body of Sophie, Duchess of Hohenberg.
Because if you take terrorism at what it really is I don't believe that this was an act of terrorism. If you look at terrorism organically, its basically an act with the intent of instilling fear or terror in the populace. Although the Serbian government denied involvement in the assassination, it's military definitely was involved with support including intelligence, weapons and other resources. The assassination was gamble with the intent to provoke the Austro-Hungarians into conflict.
That is a novel interpretation. The assassin was a short little fuck who had been rejected the military and seemed out to prove himself. It did not work out so well.
Your second point may well be so, however, as to your first point there are several different and equally valid definitions of terrorism and some do include attacks on military targets by non state actors.
The attack on the USS Cole was committed by terrorists but I agree that its hard to call the attack itself terrorist.
You, I suspect are correct, and I'm sure the British security forces may think so as well, however, as mentioned about one crosses all the "t"s and dots all the "i"s that you can think of.
Depends on how you define "target". I would think that the jetliner that was crashed into the Pentagon was just as much the target as the Pentagon itself, and in fact was responsible for most of the casualties.
Ok yeah, the fact that people were kind of leary of flying cause it was a civi plane used I would agree. How's the diarrhea from all that milk doing?
