There are obligations inherent in a contract to provide services.
Kathy P said:
1. - What's good for the goose is good for the gander. I often wonder if some (and I stress some) men are bothered by ladies in the service providing business because they are ultimately in control of when and if they want to have sex.
2. - Travelling from the academic to the ethesthetic, isn't this supposed to be about pleasure? You pay a nice lady for her time.
3. - You take care of business and then it's supposed to be about pleasure.
4. - My body, mind and soul belong to me ............ I am in the driver's seat when it comes to the choices of how I spend my time are made.
Kathy P;
I don't totally agree with some of your statements made in this thread, but in some ways I do agree with you on the basic intent of what you espouse. I have made a few italic changes above, in quoting what you wrote, to make my points.
I'm not quite sure how best to explain my feelings so I hope that I don't tread on too many of your toes, but am certain I may damage a few of them. To deal with the second point first.
1. -
You pay a nice lady for her time.
I must take issue with this! When I book with an SP I am definitely not paying her only for her time.
The concept of "paying for time" has come about as a way for agencies and individuals, to thwart the Criminal Code of Canada by inferring that the arrangement was not intended to be an offer for prostitution.
That is not reality! Such tactics, as are used by rip-off agencies and individuals, are testified to on a daily basis here and on other boards.
I am certain that you, Kathy P, do acknowledge that when you make a verbal contract to provide escort services, other than to provide e.g., an escort to a social function, that
you accept that sexual intercourse will be expected and will be provided for the specified period of time as contracted for.
In the vast majority of cases
you will be expected to provide sexual services, so you are wrong to infer that your clients are simply paying for your time. In such a contract for sexual services it is agreed that there must always be a time limit specified in the contract, so as to limit the expectations of the client - e.g. had there not been a one hour time limit I'd have offered to keep the young lady I saw last night for breakfast, and I think she would have agreed too.
2. -
men are bothered by ladies in the service providing business because they are ultimately in control of when and if they want to have sex.
Once you have contracted to be with me, then certainly it is your responsibility to provide the service
implied in the contract you made with me, as per point # 1.
I don't believe that it is to the point here, that you would have us believe that you contract for your time only!
3. -
then it's supposed to be about pleasure.
Absolutely, it is all about pleasure. Now, when a client makes a contract with you, that client has certain expectations as to how he wants that pleasure to be provided, and if he finds that the SP takes control over how and what his pleasure will be, and uses that power to exercise control over the type and extent of that pleasure, then he is going to very displeased, and with good reason, since
the obligations in the contract were not properly fulfilled.
4. -
I am in the driver's seat when it comes to the choices of how I spend my time are made.
Kathy P, I couldn't agree more with you on this, however,
if and when, you agree and contract with me to provide services to me, you have made a choice by so doing, and are therefore obliged to fulfill that contract obligation.
In other words, you gave up some of that control by agreeing to be with me, in a setting where sexual services are expected to be provided, and you should not expect to take back that which you have given up or negotiated away.
O.K. - I have now donned my safety boots and my flak jacket, in anticipation of some serious responses to the above. 
