Terrorism pays apparently

Re: Re: Re: Terrorism pays apparently

bbking said:
The Fench support them (Arabs) - doesn't that even things up.


bbk
All the French "solidarity" to the Arabs is in an not PC terms-a farce.

I am curious to know how would they deal with the home grown Algerians and Moroccan fundamentalists in France differently from and more "enlightened" than the Americans.

See the problem is the French still have the "attitude", "arrogance" like they still call all the shots, which is not the case since World War I, for heaven sake.

They can't like the British..."gracefully" accept the facts and let the "Yankees" take the torch.
 
Sep 8, 2003
3,767
0
0
Away from here.
www.reddit.com
Well the worst of it is that the Aussies are now outselling the French in the wine department so it's no wonder they're defensive.

Plus, French movies still act like it's 1965, and they can spend a good hour introducing and classifying their neuroses.
 

tompeepin

Unbanned (for now) ;)
Mar 17, 2004
846
0
0
limbo
tv-celebs.com
Mao Tse Tongue said:
Well the worst of it is that the Aussies are now outselling the French in the wine department so it's no wonder they're defensive.

Plus, French movies still act like it's 1965, and they can spend a good hour introducing and classifying their neuroses.
Yeah those damn French "terrorists"! :p You'd think it "pays" to be French.

My shit ... err ... neurosis don't stink.
 

Don

Active member
Aug 23, 2001
6,287
10
38
Toronto
Re: Re: Terrorism pays apparently

holden said:
How are they the terrorists in their own country, isn't britain, u.s. and a few aussi the terrorist when you think about it
Tyrant, oppressor, aggressor, etc... are more proper terms than terrorists. While the dictionary definition of terriorist varies, one common acknowledged terriorist tactic is the taking of hostages to use as a bargining piece. The US does not do that. You can argue that detainment of suspects as a hostage but they are doing that through a perceived (imagined or not) threat and not to use the suspect as a bargining chip.
 

loaded

New member
Jan 22, 2003
221
0
0
Mao Tse Tongue said:


Take a list of events:
1- Egypt's use of poison gas against Yemen in the 1960s;

2-the killing of tens of thousands of Syrian citizens by Assad the Elder;

3- the killing of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi citizens by Saddam Hussein;

4- the hundreds of thousands of Muslim casualties on both sides of the Iran-Iraqi war between 1980 and 1988;

5- Saddam's invasion of neighbouring Kuwait;

6- the Taliban's takeover of Afghanistan; the global terrorism of al-Qaeda;

7- the Indian-Pakistani nuclear standoff over Kashmir; the kidnappings and killings by Muslim guerrillas in the Philippines;

8- the fratricidal murders in Algeria;

9- the recent Muslim massacres in Indonesia; the current slaughter of black Christians by Arab Muslims in the Sudan --

10- As several commentators pointed out over the years -- most recently the theoretical physicist Haim Harari -- it's the profound backwardness and dysfunctionality of the Arab/Muslim world........

11- "The 22 member countries of the Arab league, from Mauritania to the Gulf States, have a total population of 300 million," said Professor Harari in a speech in April, "larger than the U.S. and almost as large as the EU before its expansion. They have a land area larger than either the United States or all of Europe. These 22 countries, with all their oil and natural resources, have a combined GDP smaller than that of Netherlands plus Belgium."
Some answers to your bigotry:
1- your beloved winston the racist churchill gassed the kurds 70 years before saddam, egypt just thought they could do the same....

2- when syria fights fundamentalists, it is attrocities, but when the americans do it, they are defending freedom......

3- again churchill put forth a proposal to sterilize roughly 100,000 "mental degenerates" and dispatch several thousand others to state-run labor camps.....

4- so what ?? was the first war between civilizations ???

5- kuwait was never a country, it was always part of iraq, the british bought off a local klan and called it kuwait...

6- bla bla bla, forget that the CIA trained and financed these fuckers to fight off the russians...

7- keep it simple, is it the arab world, or the muslim world, mixing the two only reveals the hate of the person who wrote is.... KKK

8- the west was calling on middleeastern nations to follow the democratical system in algeria, so they hold elections, the muslims win, the west is upset and so give the government cover to commit genocide....

9- again see 7 + the people dying are muslims not christians, not much of a journalist is he ??

10- thats right ask a jew what he thinks of the arab world, he is very objective

11- of the 22 nations, the beloved west has bomed/sanctioned/occupied more than half...how in hell are you supposed to produce anything when youre being bombed/sanctioned and occupied, survival is usually more important
 

loaded

New member
Jan 22, 2003
221
0
0
RemyMartin said:
Yes, women will be fucked, but only they fuck your women.

Do you know if you are in Mid-East and fuck their women, they will cut your little brother off.
NO, they tie a rope to your little brother, keep feeding you peanuts untill you can not breath and then they take turns pulling on the rope.....no lubrication I am guessing
 
loaded said:
Some answers to your bigotry:
1- your beloved winston the racist churchill gassed the kurds 70 years before saddam, egypt just thought they could do the same....
And he was regretable....no not for gassing the Kurds but failing to "trisecting" the then Iraq into Shite, Sunni and Kurds kingdoms, rather than having King Faisal to run the show.

2- when syria fights fundamentalists, it is attrocities, but when the americans do it, they are defending freedom......
True it's not fair since the Baathists are more like the combination of Communists (Soviet assistance) and Nazis (Anti-Semitic/Israel). It is unique because they still pay "lips" service to Islam.

The Americans didn't give a damn what happened in Syria since Syria does not have oil.

Plus, the then American administration was under the Gipper, an ultra-religious conservative who had yet to see the real danger of Islamic fundamentalism. Otherwise, would he "stop" the Soviet to get the job done in Afghanistan and train and ship the Mujahadeen to "chop the bears paws"?

Did I say the Syrians have beef to the Americans when the Syrians "control" the Palestinians terrorists factions like a master of puppet show and allow the Iranian Revolutionary Guard to arm the Hizbullah? Remember there were American bloods on their hands.

3- again churchill put forth a proposal to sterilize roughly 100,000 "mental degenerates" and dispatch several thousand others to state-run labor camps.....
WTF are you talking about? Are you talking about Stalin?

4- so what ?? was the first war between civilizations ???
It won't be the first and it won't be the last.

At least that's for Samuel Huntington.

5- kuwait was never a country, it was always part of iraq, the british bought off a local klan and called it kuwait...
It doesn't matter. In fact, maybe except Persia/Iran. Many modern Middle East countries are "created" out of the ashes of the Ottoman Empire. At least the Turks don't mind after WWI.

The real matter is the Emir of Kuwait was gutsy enough to ask Saddam to pay back the debt Saddam got to kill the armies of the Ayatollahs. Saddam was in default and the Emir was persistent. Saddam was so pissed that he could only use his large army to "stop" Kuwait from contiuously asking for money lend.

Think about as lending money to the wise guys to do your bidding. Would you ask the wise guys to get the money back?

6- bla bla bla, forget that the CIA trained and financed these fuckers to fight off the russians...
Look what kind of monster the Republicans created during the 80s.

7- keep it simple, is it the arab world, or the muslim world, mixing the two only reveals the hate of the person who wrote is.... KKK
There may be different "version" of conflicts within the Muslim world but regretably the cause behind those conflicts are getting similar nowadays.

Still you could argue there are two issues between Kashmir and Phillippines.

8- the west was calling on middleeastern nations to follow the democratical system in algeria, so they hold elections, the muslims win, the west is upset and so give the government cover to commit genocide....
To my knowledge, those Middle Eastern dictators like Assad and Saddam Hussein used to be the Soviet clients and the west are not exclusive to back up middle east governments committing atrocities.

What about Iran?

BTW, the Americans always use Turkey as an "example" of how "democracy" work in the Middle-East--under the strong secular military dictatorship or "guardianship".

As far as Algeria is concern, ask the French. They were the ones who asked the military government in Algiers to "democratize" so that there will be less Algerians alliens coming ashore to Marsailles!

9- again see 7 + the people dying are muslims not christians, not much of a journalist is he ??
More Muslims died than Christians because the Muslims "brothers" have less firepower.

10- thats right ask a jew what he thinks of the arab world, he is very objective
So all Yahood are "incapable" of being "objective" to the Arab world.

What about those Sephardim? Obviously their mentality aren't exactly the same page as the Ashkanzim brothers.

11- of the 22 nations, the beloved west has bomed/sanctioned/occupied more than half...how in hell are you supposed to produce anything when youre being bombed/sanctioned and occupied, survival is usually more important
Can you show us the names of the 11 countries that are both bombed/santioned/occupied and being oppressive?
 
Toronto Escorts