That you are increasingly a dick.DonQuixote said:I DID NOT!!!
I did say you are Patriot Light.
I did say that you strongly identify
with your social/pier group.
And we both admire McCain.
So, what's your issues?
Geez, what a grumpy old man.onthebottom said:That you are increasingly a dick.
OTB
These aren't statistics one frequently sees cited. Thanks for posting them.ocean976124 said:As for how many priests are molestors? The John Jay Report findings said 4%. As for the general population, one expert in pedophilia, Dr. John Bradford, "estimates its [pedophilia's] prevalence at maybe four percent of the population" (John Cloud, "Pedophilia," Time, April 29, 2002).
While I 't can't really support the no-marriage policy the RC Church has for priests it's not really a concern of mine (although I do think it contributes to this issue). I do have a problem with the cover-up the RC Church has perpetrated at the cost of more children being molested to help the RC Church save face. I wonder if one could use the RICO laws to prosecute the Church for obstruction.....ocean976124 said:Having previously worked in the development offices of a few Catholic Colleges I can say most of what people think about the operating functions of the Catholic Church is usually wrong. Unless a priest or a bishop is an outright heretic there's very little the Vatican can make them do. Even the local bishop cannot just take money from a local parish.
The Catholic Church only runs from the top in regards to theology. In how the Church functions it works from the bottom up.
People say, "Why don't they just sell off the property?" Well, problem is some of the property the Church has was willed to them for a specific purpose and they legally aren't allowed to sell it for profit.
Secondly, simply closing local churches is a huge problem. Boston is still in court because parishioners sued the Bishop for closing their parishes.
As for how many priests are molestors? The John Jay Report findings said 4%.
As for the general population, one expert in pedophilia, Dr. John Bradford, "estimates its [pedophilia's] prevalence at maybe four percent of the population" (John Cloud, "Pedophilia," Time, April 29, 2002).
This I agree in many ways is the more serious of the problems. Not that I'm excusing the pedophila, there are, however, bad eggs in many baskets. However, the the systematic cover-ups and shell games that were played, the failure to report to the police, and most importantly the failure to protect future victims were all far from the standards that any denomination should be attempting to met.onthebottom said:I do have a problem with the cover-up the RC Church has perpetrated at the cost of more children being molested to help the RC Church save face.
One of the problems was that Bishops and Archbishops, Abbots etc. . . weren't honest with each other, pawning off their problem children and never warning that this person was unsuitable for either parish ministry or any ministry involving children. . .DonQuixote said:Your reference to the Church implies it is a single
entity under the law. Its not. Each diocese is a separate legal entity.
But didn't they play hide-the-priest among multiple diocese?DonQuixote said:My concern is their ignoring the injury and suffering
of the innocent victims.
Your reference to the Church implies it is a single
entity under the law. Its not. Each diocese is a
separate legal entity. You would have to show
collusion and a systematic policy which is near
impossible to prove, IMO.
OTB that's what my post #64 was about as well.DonQuixote said:No, in most cases the priest's records of misconduct
aren't shared by the receiving diocese. A coverup
is a coverup, even on other dioceses.
If they did what you suggest then your RICO argument
will prevail.
And they wont be playing hide the priest, but rather hide the twinky. I say feed those sick fuckers to the Lions. I would buy box seats for that....DonQuixote said:Are you serious?![]()
Understandable, but you certainly can't be surprised. The pattern of denial has been established for decades.DonQuixote said:I agree. I'm RC and do Mass.
This is an extremely sordid affair and
an embarassment to those that walk
the walk. I'm both angry and feel
betrayed.
Well, maybe. It could also demonstrate that people are hardwired to want to be true believers.DonQuixote said:The fact that they're still around
bears witness to the fact that there
must be something worthwhile when
you add up the pluses and minuses
Quite true and very eloquently put!DonQuixote said:It has to do with those existential moments when
we wonder to ourselves what this trip is all about.
What brings me back is reading what is attributed
to Jesus. Assume he's not God and part of the
Trinity. Assume he's no different than us.
Then read what he said. Read his teachings.
The quotes from him are quite incredible. They
are just as valid and authentic today as they
were 2 centuries ago.
The problem is that every church has a
Sanhedrin who resent a challenge to their
ordained authority.
The cover up is indeed the issue. But the problem is not always one of malice. Many of them just had no idea what the hell they were dealing with.onthebottom said:I do have a problem with the cover-up the RC Church has perpetrated at the cost of more children being molested to help the RC Church save face. I wonder if one could use the RICO laws to prosecute the Church for obstruction.....
OTB
OTB
And actually in most places (but not all) each individual parish is a single corporation legally unconnected to the other parishes...DonQuixote said:Each diocese is a
separate legal entity.