Allegra Escorts Collective

The cell phone camera thread

Cinema Face

New member
Mar 1, 2003
3,636
3
0
The Middle Kingdom
There’s a DSLR thread, a non-DSLR thread and both are active and full of useful information.

I thought I’d have a little fun and start a thread about those crappy, annoying but useful cameras that are buried in our cell phones as an afterthought.

The hard-core photo-buffs might turn up their noses at the idea of a camera-phone discussion but I’m sure I’m not the only one who was glad on many occasions where I had a camera with me when I needed it.

So love them or hate them, I’m sure many people must have an opinion.


Here’s my $0.02 worth.

Useless
My first cell phone that had a camera was a Motorola V220. The camera was a .3 mp and it was completely useless. I experimented with it and wrote if off as some useless gimmick that I’ll never use. The results weren’t worth the effort.

Sucks but occasionally useful
Then I got a Motorola RAZR V3 with a 1.3 mp camera. The camera was much improved but still pretty bad. I ended up using it on a few occasions. In daylight or a brightly lit room it could take a semi-useful picture. I used it but when I showed pix to other people, I felt the need to explain that this was my cell camera. I had to make an excuse because of the poor image quality.
This was the first time I realized that , yes it’s a crappy camera but it’s always with me and ready to take a picture if needed.

Not great but doesn't suck and is moderately useful
Today, I’m using a Nokia E71 with a 3.2 mp camera. I have to say that it is much improved to the point that I no longer need to be embarrassed when I snap a picture with it. It’s not even close to my P&S camera but it’s good enough to use as a backup and it's always with me. It has some useful features such as autofocus, macro mode, self time, white balance and some scene modes. It also takes a surprisingly good night shot. It even has a little LED flash. It’s not a great camera but it doesn’t suck either.


A whole lot better...
What I’ve been reading is that the camera phones coming out are going to be a lot better. They could mean the end of the low end P&S market.

I was looking at this camera on the weekend.
http://www.sonyericsson.com/cws/products/mobilephones/overview/satio?lc=en&cc=gb


Here’s some famous photographer by the name of Chase Jarvis who made a coffee table book of his work and every picture is taken with his iphone. The guy’s an artist so the pictures are great. The point is the camera doesn’t matter as much as the photographer.

http://www.amazon.com/dp/0321684788/?tag=kenrockwellcom

I’m a firm believer that the best camera in the world is the one you’ve got with you when you need it.

Discuss...
 

thecuriousgeorge

Lucky lil Monkey...
Nov 18, 2009
1,696
6
38
Out being curious
I’m a firm believer that the best camera in the world is the one you’ve got with you when you need it.
I agree to a point...

I hate carry my regular camera around but to occasions I bring it...

However my phone is full of candid and random pics that i just happen to see.

And because of that i've changed my phones....i use to have a sony experia(3.2mp), which was fun and all (anyone want to buy it?) but i bought a sony c905 shortly after simply because it has an 8mp camera on it. I love it, i wish it took the pics a little faster but the detail is good enough. In fact last nite i got a pic of a car who had just knocked over a traffic light pole and its hood was wrapped around the pole on the floor...got a cool pic now...lol

No camera phone (not even that really nice 12mp u posted in your OP) will ever touch a real camera mp for mp...but they come in real handy, because a lot of good pics happen when u don't expect them too...and walking around with a digi camera or DSLR is just dumb....u only really bring them when u know ur gonna be takin pics...

So camera phones are a convience to me...i don't expect great quality out of them but they serve their purpose
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,764
0
0
Lots of videos of car crashes and houses on fire shown on TV news are taken with cellphone cameras.
 

Cinema Face

New member
Mar 1, 2003
3,636
3
0
The Middle Kingdom
I agree to a point...




No camera phone (not even that really nice 12mp u posted in your OP) will ever touch a real camera mp for mp...but they come in real handy, because a lot of good pics happen when u don't expect them too...and walking around with a digi camera or DSLR is just dumb....u only really bring them when u know ur gonna be takin pics...

So camera phones are a convience to me...i don't expect great quality out of them but they serve their purpose
Never say never.

From what I’ve been seeing, camera phones will get a lot better in the future. They will probably disrupt the low end camera market if they can approach the quality and features of a cheap digicam.

The main difference that I see separating a camera phone and a low end camera (apart from the sensor quality) is an optical zoom and a thyristor flash. The little LED light is far too wimpy to take an acceptable night shot.

There shouldn’t be any technical issue putting an optical zoom and a thryistor in a camera phone.
The sensors will improve over time as well.

The availability of a camera phone is really hard to beat. Like most people, I have the habit of carrying my cell phone with me and charging the battery regularly. So I have a usable camera everywhere, all the time.
 
Toronto Escorts