The First Attack: 9/11 WTC sub-level explosions

[Cinema Face]

Conspiracists crack me up. Never mind the hundreds or thousands of experts that say one thing. They drag up one “expert” that says something else and that the one they believe.

 

[Mcluhan]

Conspiracists crack me up. Never mind the hundreds or thousands of experts that say one thing. They drag up one “expert” that says something else and that the one they believe.

We the people need to reclaim the language that we think in. It has been subverted. Language has been weaponised (TM) . This time very effectively. You do not have the tools to think straight. Advise in this case, is useless. No one can give you the tools. You need only to close your eyes, and open your mind. If you do not find the tools, try it again some other time. Eventually, you will find the tools to think.

 

[Cinema Face]

WTF????
Well I guess you’re pretty farcked in the language.

Give your language a shake.

Get your language out of your ass.

 

[Mcluhan]

WTF????
Well I guess you’re pretty farcked in the language.

Give your language a shake.

Get your language out of your ass.

Exhibit "A"

 

[Aardvark154]

Perhaps Mr Aaronovitch is simply following the directions handed down from the top of The Times attempting to shame sheeple into blindly following the "official" story about what happened.

Here's what Dan Rather

Humm who has more credibility as a journalist. Doubtless you will say Mr. Rather, sadly CBS disagrees with you.

 

[Aardvark154]

We the people need to reclaim the language that we think in. It has been subverted. Language has been weaponised (TM) .

Did "we the people" trade mark the phrase as spelled?

 

[Mcluhan]

Humm who has more credibility as a journalist. Doubtless you will say Mr. Rather, sadly CBS disagrees with you.

Alice, that's a good example of 'Alice's bait'. Every bait here has a certain scent. Yours is particularly noticeable. Not faint at all.

 

[Mcluhan]

Did "we the people" trade mark the phrase as spelled?

Do you ask, sans 'z' ? If then, yes.

 

[Protoss]

Humm who has more credibility as a journalist. Doubtless you will say Mr. Rather, sadly CBS disagrees with you.

Not the way I look at it at all. Fortunately a growing number cares less and less what CBS top brass thinks about anything. I think it encouraging that more and more people are finally waking up and not ready to be told what and how to think by the heads traditional mainstream media.

http://broadcastengineering.com/newsrooms/poll_reveals_overall_declining/

 

[onthebottom]

Not the way I look at it at all. Fortunately a growing number cares less and less what CBS top brass thinks about anything. I think it encouraging that more and more people are finally waking up and not ready to be told what and how to think by the heads traditional mainstream media.

http://broadcastengineering.com/newsrooms/poll_reveals_overall_declining/

Fox kicked ass 2:1... LMAO

OTB

 

[Mcluhan]

Not the way I look at it at all. Fortunately a growing number cares less and less what CBS top brass thinks about anything. I think it encouraging that more and more people are finally waking up and not ready to be told what and how to think by the heads traditional mainstream media.

http://broadcastengineering.com/newsrooms/poll_reveals_overall_declining/

There are four corporates that one would need to influence in order to control the mind of America. Only four.

 

[train]

Take your best shot.

If you keep this up you are just going to be ignored. People will shake there heads and just walk on by.

 

[Protoss]

Fox kicked ass 2:1... LMAO

OTB

yeah . . . highest of the low. I'm a bit surprised in a way. After all CNN "is the most trusted name in news" ... they even tell you so . . .and of course they would never lie.

 

[Mcluhan]

Hey, are you around. I have this mean mess figured out now to the nth. Clear your PM box pls.

Cheers!
Mcluhan

 

[papasmerf]

Welcome back Mac

 

[Mcluhan]

yeah . . . highest of the low. I'm a bit surprised in a way. After all CNN "is the most trusted name in news" ... they even tell you so . . .and of course they would never lie.

Hey, are you around. I have this mean mess figured out now to the nth. Clear your PM box pls.

Cheers!
Mcluhan

 

[Mcluhan]

Hi Papa, sorry to disappoint, i'm not back. Done here. Looking for buddy

 

[papasmerf]

Hi Papa, sorry to disappoint, i'm not back. Done here. Looking for buddy

Hope you find what you are looking for and life treats you with kindness

 

[Mcluhan]

Hope you find what you are looking for and life treats you with kindness

Same to you bud, same to you.

 

[Ulan Bator]

Could be lots of things. Who knows; here's one plausible explanation: The first blast is the shock wave from the impact which likely travelled through elevator shafts, blowing out windows, etc., throughout the building. the fireball on impact was enormous.

Later impacts could be the debris falling and hitting the ground above him, which from the height of the impact would have arrived around 10 seconds after the shockwave from the impact, or might have even fallen off later. The second shock could have also been some internal building support giving way suddenly causing load to shift to a different part of the superstructure.

Could have been any number of other things too all relating to the impact of the plane and resulting structural damages.

Looks like you got it all figured out. Are you saying that witnesses at the scene who heard explosions, firemen even, all got it wrong? You're joking of course! I would put more credibility in an eye witness statement than what some crackpot in a laboratory says.