Thanks for disproving your own bullshit.The IRA were considered terrorists.
...
Same way the word 'terrorist' only applies to brown people ...
But you have a long history of denying Hamas is a terror group.
Thanks for disproving your own bullshit.The IRA were considered terrorists.
...
Same way the word 'terrorist' only applies to brown people ...
Well you are the master of antisemitic tropes.Stop pushing that antisemitic trope that its 'antisemitic' to be against genocide.
Only 40% of US Jews identify as zionists.
Stop trying to tar them all as supporting genocide.
Nonsense.Unlikely. He has a well established pattern of basing his conclusions solely on who's being blamed and not on the law or the group quoting that law.
'terror group'.But you have a long history of denying Hamas is a terror group.
I will repeat myself again. The HR report discussed nothin at all other than Hamas' crimes against humanity on Oct.7. Israel's actions on other dates are not germane to HRW's statement. What are your opinions re:Shazi, I will repeat myself again.
Hamas committed some war crimes on Oct 7, they should be taken to court of those allegations. Israel has committed way more war crimes before Oct 7 and since, they should also be taken to court over those war crimes.
So your position is "No Jews. No news." Lots of ant-Semites feel the same.And who gave a shit about either of them?
I will repeat myself again. The HR report
You are arguing that Israel isn't democratic and its only 'Jews' now?So your position is "No Jews. No news." Lots of ant-Semites feel the same.
Which ones, Geno? You like speaking in vague terms. Give us some specifics.Hamas committed some war crimes on Oct 7,
I've repeatedly argued that one of the reasons that the US supports Israel is not because of lobby groups but because Israel's democracy reflects that of the US' more than any other country in the region.You are arguing that Israel isn't democratic
Lets find out when the ICC presses charges, Shazi.Which ones, Geno? You like speaking in vague terms. Give us some specifics.
Bullshit, Shazi.I've repeatedly argued that one of the reasons that the US supports Israel is not because of lobby groups but because Israel's democracy reflects that of the US' more than any other country in the region.
You already know that Hamas committed war crimes on Oct.7. There is no reason that we should not find out now.Lets find out when the ICC presses charges, Shazi.
So you know that Israel is committing genocide already as well?You already know that Hamas committed war crimes on Oct.7. There is no reason that we should not find out now.
Have we ever discussed that before? I don't recall.So you know that Israel is committing genocide already as well?
Let’s humor this for a moment and try to imagine what would actually happen.No. My position is "No Israelis? No money. No weapons. No troops. You're on your own."
I've read it.
I've also read your points and the reason you posted it is more clear than you think.
I think you want a discussion about how charges of genocide are somehow meaningless because of Lemkin's frustration with the definition and laws that were passed.
No.Ah, you're back to this claim that votes were promised and its just mean or punishment to choose to vote for someone else or not at all.
Back to your very first criticism and argument.
If you want to spend your time whining that's it not really genocide because Lemkin wanted changes to the law
Jesus it is a comedy routine now.or that those voters are being mean
And yet you seem to object to the article.'The proper definition'.
There are issues with all laws, courts and how they are implemented and interpreted. None are perfect or 'the proper definition'.
There are major issues with the ICJ and the ICC as well with the UN, just as there are even bigger issues with US democracy and its legal system.
But its what we've got and we need to work with it.
What an insane take on things you have.That's not what this discussion is about. You haven't raised any specific issues with the law or the definition, you just posted this article to try to lay the ground that the UN definition isn't the 'proper definition' so its ok to support the Israeli genocide because you'll find a reason that makes it not fit whatever you think really is the 'proper definition'.
I am glad you are at least admitting this is about punishment now.You'll declare its therefore 'pragmatic' and that everyone should not withhold their votes as its mean to punish politicians for being corrupt, backing murder or even the not properly defined 'genocide'.
That you don't understand lots of things is a given.I expect you won't respond to this post or declare that I don't understand or something rather than respond directly.
There you go.
Oh, this should be fun.
Yup! I was right.
That was fun.
No.
I'm pointing out that this group is explicit about what they are doing electorally.
View attachment 353488 .
View attachment 353489
Note the language.
They are quite clear about their goals.
I respect that clarity.
It gets funnier and funnier.
Jesus it is a comedy routine now.
There is no content in this post.And yet you seem to object to the article.
What an insane take on things you have.
I am glad you are at least admitting this is about punishment now.
You denied that for a long time.
That you don't understand lots of things is a given.
It's just kind of baked into the conversation.