Congratulations America.
You have, it seems, 3 reasonable, articulate, bright candidates for President of your nation. There are certainly differences in their stances on issues, but McCain, Clinton, and Obama, are all strong candidates.
The next President won't be someone who can't read a brief more than a page long (Reagan). He/She won't be someone who mangles the English language (Bush sr., Bush jr.). He/She won't be someone who thinks policy should be forged via soundbites (Reagan, Bush jr.). He/She won't be a stiff (Gore, Kerry). He/She won't pose for pictures in his/her yacht wearing a ridiculous captain's hat (Kerry).
You know, I'm pretty sure, too, that the next President won't be using the oval office to cheat on his/her spouse.
What can I say? Nothing, but well done. These are the strongest candidates you've had to choose from since the Nixon era. Now I know some of you are so iealogically set, that you'll attempt to disparage this one or that. Cool off for a bit and take a step back and pat yourself on the back, knowing you've got three reasonable, bright candidates - all of whom seem to genuinely appreciate each other. It's a shame only one of them can win.
You know, if the Democrats do win, they should consider reaching out to McCain for a cabinet post. (Ridiculous? You guys don't remember a guy named Kissinger, then.)
Now - as to who I'd vote for:
Well, I really like John McCain, but I'm afraid, I think he's too old. It will be another year yet before he can actually take office. I really like him, but he should retire. I'm glad he's going to beat Romney and Huckabee (yuckabee).
That leaves me with Clinton vs. Obama. Right now, I'd support Clinton. Her nuanced position on Iraq is much closer to mine.
Too bad I don't get to vote.
You have, it seems, 3 reasonable, articulate, bright candidates for President of your nation. There are certainly differences in their stances on issues, but McCain, Clinton, and Obama, are all strong candidates.
The next President won't be someone who can't read a brief more than a page long (Reagan). He/She won't be someone who mangles the English language (Bush sr., Bush jr.). He/She won't be someone who thinks policy should be forged via soundbites (Reagan, Bush jr.). He/She won't be a stiff (Gore, Kerry). He/She won't pose for pictures in his/her yacht wearing a ridiculous captain's hat (Kerry).
You know, I'm pretty sure, too, that the next President won't be using the oval office to cheat on his/her spouse.
What can I say? Nothing, but well done. These are the strongest candidates you've had to choose from since the Nixon era. Now I know some of you are so iealogically set, that you'll attempt to disparage this one or that. Cool off for a bit and take a step back and pat yourself on the back, knowing you've got three reasonable, bright candidates - all of whom seem to genuinely appreciate each other. It's a shame only one of them can win.
You know, if the Democrats do win, they should consider reaching out to McCain for a cabinet post. (Ridiculous? You guys don't remember a guy named Kissinger, then.)
Now - as to who I'd vote for:
Well, I really like John McCain, but I'm afraid, I think he's too old. It will be another year yet before he can actually take office. I really like him, but he should retire. I'm glad he's going to beat Romney and Huckabee (yuckabee).
That leaves me with Clinton vs. Obama. Right now, I'd support Clinton. Her nuanced position on Iraq is much closer to mine.
Too bad I don't get to vote.