This guy is not very classy
- Thread starter fuji
- Start date
Not so. How often have you heard someone say in the outside world or write on this BB, where opinions abound, ''I could be wrong, but......', 'I'm not sure but ..........', or 'it's a possibility that.....' .The same is true for most people isn't it? We believe we are right when we give an opinion.
I can't understand why some people are so bent out of shape for one guy's honest opinion.
As far as the guy in the story, this is just the tip of the iceberg for screwing with taxpayer's money - I'm glad he was quickly ditched. I hope his wife dumps him as well and takes him for a financial ride for this public humiliation.
Most people's opinions here are honest, but some posters put on such airs around them and that reeks. When they're proven wrong, beyond any doubt, they freak and often just run and hide with not ability/want/expectation to say, Ooops.
Last edited:
I tell you what Fuji, you keep your mistress and gf. I fulfill your wife's sexual desires and she won't even remember who you are!
Cycleguy007;3042941But right vs wrong is a matter of perspective in your mind.... Correct? [/quote said:Not always, sometimes it is a matter of fact. For example, it's a fact that the term "high class" finds its etymology in a reference to the upper classes, in the sense of holding them out as models to be emulated.
Yes, people want to pick and choose what aspects of upper class behavior should be emulated: dress, speech, manners, style, and so on, are commonly included. My inclusion of "cheating" in that list is controversial, but it is not wrong. It is a behavior of the upper classes, of high class individuals, that is routinely depicted in our films and our literature, and ubiquitous in real life. It is also the case that the upper classes expect such cheating to be done discretely.
Yes, it's controversial, but the controversy arises from hypocrisy, and that hypocrisy needs to be exposed for what it is.
I predict that those who are so offended at the notion that "high class" behavior includes a discrete mistress will turn out to be deeply conflicted individuals who have not come to proper terms with their own conflicting desires.
Well at least you seem to have a basic grasp of what we have been trying to do with you. And here I thought you just weren't getting it.Yes, it's controversial, but the controversy arises from hypocrisy, and that hypocrisy needs to be exposed for what it is.
.
The thing is, he thinks that hypocrisy doesn't apply to him......hyppocrite thy name is Fuji......Well at least you seem to have a basic grasp of what we have been trying to do with you. And here I thought you just weren't getting it.
The thing is, he thinks that hypocrisy doesn't apply to him......hyppocrite thy name is Fuji......
TB, he tried the same approach with me and got nowhere/bupkis. Like we need to spend our time with our SO's review our every activity past and present.So tboy have you been honest with your past/present/future partners about your involvement in terb?
I've been around too long. It's even to hard to even keep my short CV under three pages now. How much time do I/we spend talking about my past or present before I'm accused of being too into myself.
Whether or not withholding information from your SO is immoral/wrong/dishonest/cheating depends on whether SHE would think it's relevant to her decision to stay with you. Would SHE potentially change her opinion of you if she knew you fucked 100's of escorts before you met her? If SHE would then it's dishonest of you not to tell her.TB, he tried the same approach with me and got nowhere/bupkis. Like we need to spend our time with our SO's review our every activity past and present.
My opinion on this is straight forward: I am all in favour of sexual dishonesty. In fact, proud of it.
You, however, are walking a difficult line if you want to say that one kind of sexual dishonesty is OK but another kind is wrong.
Classic Train, an absolute Classic!Well at least you seem to have a basic grasp of what we have been trying to do with you. And here I thought you just weren't getting it.
So if TB had a threesome some time in his past, ok just so he's not alone, or I had one, do you think we're being dishonest if we don't tell our present SO's that we've had that experience before we met, just to see if that ok with them? Where does it stop? Do I tell her I had a black girlfriend once, or maybe dated the bosses daughter, or woke up one morning and didn't remember the name of the girl next to me (the statute of limitation has run out on all the aforementioned events, so nyah!). FFS where does it become a ludicrous point. We're not being dishonest. We're just not talking about every relationship we've ever had before our present SO. That's all. It's not a question of dishonesty/honesty. In my case if mine wants to know, she'll ask and I'd talk about it; if not, I won't. If I did this commentary, it wouldn't take long for my present SO to say, 'shut the fuck up will ya and pick up the vacuum'.Whether or not withholding information from your SO is immoral/wrong/dishonest/cheating depends on whether SHE would think it's relevant to her decision to stay with you. Would SHE potentially change her opinion of you if she knew you fucked 100's of escorts before you met her? If SHE would then it's dishonest of you not to tell her.
My opinion on this is straight forward: I am all in favour of sexual dishonesty. In fact, proud of it.
You, however, are walking a difficult line if you want to say that one kind of sexual dishonesty is OK but another kind is wrong.
BTW, I haven't fucked a 100 women let alone escorts so that's a mute point. I realize that puts me way behind a good number of you guys, recalling a past thread, but hey.
