So you are saying that Justin set himself up for failure ?You get what you always get, diplomats being "recalled" or "expelled".
Whatever could his motive been?
Last edited:
So you are saying that Justin set himself up for failure ?You get what you always get, diplomats being "recalled" or "expelled".
How is this a failure?So you are saying that Justin set himself up for failure ?
Whatever could his motive been?
What is your position here?How is this a failure?
How do you know they haven't determined that the political influence wasn't illegal?For legal/law enforcement to determine.
Whose political influence was illegal?How do you know they haven't determined that the political influence wasn't illegal?
How come PeePee has been in hiding for the last 5 days?
On what basis and evidence do you hold this belief?Whose political influence was illegal?
Pierre has nothing to do with this.
This is my point.
Trudeau's true intentions seems to be to try and sabotage Pierre's campaign by appearing to crack down on foreign interference.
While distracting from his own troubles.
On the basis of no charges being filed despite the repeated statements of the presence of proof.On what basis and evidence do you hold this belief?
You think PeePee is trustworthy?
Trudeau isn't in charge of laying charges, if they are warranted.On the basis of no charges being filed despite the repeated statements of the presence of proof.
And after everything Trudeau has done, I do trust Pierre more.
"Trudeau isn't responsible _(fill in the blanks)____"...there is that line again.Trudeau isn't in charge of laying charges, if they are warranted.
What would that matter?What is your position here?
It seems me that you have already successfully jumped to that conclusionI'm trying to understand your argument that nothing is real unless there is a conviction in court.
The conclusion that that is your position?It seems me that you have already successfully jumped to that conclusion![]()
Do you think Trudeau presses the charges himself?"Trudeau isn't responsible _(fill in the blanks)____"...there is that line again.![]()
My position has already been stated in prior posts.The conclusion that that is your position?
If that's misrepresenting it, then please clarify.
It is, actually.My position has already been stated in prior posts.
It isn't ambiguous.
No, that is not his job and it would be political interference if he tried.He is responsible.
It is unambiguous if you read my posts without jumping to conclusions.It is, actually.
I can't follow it from the thread other than "Trudeau sucks".
So let's keep it tight.
What is your position on the RCMP statement?
I said he was responsible.No, that is not his job and it would be political interference if he tried.
That is technically wrong.I said he was responsible.