Trudeau harming relations between India and Canada?
- Thread starter canada-man
- Start date
No.
You are arguing he should break the law.
You are arguing that Trudeau should break the secrets act to name names or interfere with the justice system to make them arrest opponents.
CBC covered it better than I would.
To add, There is nothing specifically stating that Poilievre needs to be the one receiving briefing.
CPC Lawyer explained anyone within the CPC with clearance can be briefed on this and have been briefed on other classified issue before. Trudeau is just twisting the truth.
It's just a trap to muzzle Poilievre.
Then consider me wildly stupid and explain it like I'm 5.
What is he responsible for?
Sure, someone else in the cons can be briefed.
They just can't then tell PeePee what's in the report, since he is compromised and can't get clearance.
Where did he go?
You're mixing it up.
Trudeau said India was involved in Nijjar's killing.
He said India was using criminal gangs in Canada to do their dirty work.
Admitted no evidence for these, just intel.
If he is going to accuse a country, he has to present evidence.
Otherwise they wont entertain him.
The other issue is with conservatives being under India's thumb.
Can't Trudeau, like DesRicardo said, release the names to someone within the CPC with security clearance as a threat reduction measure if he was so concerned?
His avoidance in all 3 cases means that he most likely wants to sabotage Pierre's campaign and distract from his issues.
OK, so your issue is that you can't accuse a country without presenting evidence.
What kind of evidence is sufficient for you?
Is it, as I inferred, evidence available to a court of law, married to criminal charges?
Or is there some lesser standard you would accept?
So you just know Trudeau did it wrong, but have no actual opinion on what would be acceptable?
It is not for me to define what is acceptable.
But we can see the results and what his ulterior motives are here.
Which is to distract.
He was first quoting what the Indian Govt. claimed. Then he corrected himself. The fact is that Our own Govt. stated that they expelled these Diplomats.
Now you are trying to pick on that one video that CTV "doctored" to allege that this reporter is deliberately changing his tune after stating that they were "recalled"!!
Think about this. Why would any Govt. just "recall" their diplomats if they were innocent? Then they would just expel the Diplomats if it was not a tit for tat retaliation?
India just refused to waive the immunity, and that is why Canada expelled them. The UK Govt. have backed Canada in this matter!!
It is clear that an Indian official was also involved with the attempted, assassination of a USA Citizen. So no doubt that these 6 individuals have had a hand in Nijjar Singh's Killing!!
CSIS and Five Eyes said India was involved in the killing, not just Trudeau. I know, you're a big Modi supporter so won't accept this.
Your issue is with the allegation that Modi is committing foreign assassinations, which it appears you support.
PeePee's issues are different. PeePee had security clearance previously but hasn't renewed it since he married. Rumours are also out that is his wife's mafia connections that might be his own personal issues, whether or not he's named as working with India to thwart Canadian democracy.
CSIS and Five Eyes, have intel. Not evidence. Trudeau admitted that.
Trudeau is trying to sabotage Pierre and distract from his own failures.
How do you know its not evidence?
Where did Trudeau say there was no evidence.
He repeatedly said they were recalled.
Then someone at CTV texted him and he changed his tune.
Just like the Indian press is pro-Modi, the Canadian press is pro-Trudeau.
