Trump rescuing white South Africans from "genocide"
- Thread starter Robert Mugabe
- Start date
For now, as the man says.
Liberals as so daft when it comes to facing reality. At some point you're going to have to come to terms with the state of things and the clear direction they're going.
Not even in the same league, buddy.
DEI, in theory, is about getting underrepresented minorities opportunities. It's not about ensuring the over-representation of the majority and giving the majority all of the opportunities.
You either stand for justice for all, or you don't.
Last edited:
Things have to get really bad before they get better.
Forty years of previous administrations kicking the can down the road has consequences.
Sure, 4 years of recession/depression from trump will be totally worth it in the end.
Are you looking for a system that ensures the over-representation of the majority?
I'm looking for a system that ensures over-representation in competencies required to build and maintain it.
Everyone wins in that way.
Without it, everyone loses.
This is a video from a year ago:
The mixed-race non-binary person who has the brainpower to cure cancer or develop perpetual motion is unable to get the education and access to resources to do those things. You are advocating for a big-tent, free-education, Universal basic income society.
As for the "genocide", here's a very plain woman explaining why you're wrong, and doing it in a way that lets you know she's disappointed in you:
You post a video of an American white woman who has never set foot in South Africa and uses statistics provided by the corrupt South African government itself. Her opinion isn't relevant.
I'm disappointed that you would use her video as source material.
I don't know what "mixed race non-binary" people have to do with the discussion either. These uber catchphrases and descriptors don't achieve anything. Nobody here is going to pat you on the back for virtue-signalling.
What I'm advocating was made very clear in my post that you quoted.
Last edited:
As soon as she called twitter ''shitter'' I was out...She's biased and it shows.
You've just made my point. You are discounting her information based on your perception of her. Oracle discounted it based on her choice of words.
The facts that she presents are facts. Two of you have discounted it based on her birthplace, gender, race and speech patterns [American, White, Woman, Shitter]. Imagine if she was a black South African with a heavy accent, or an indigenous Canadian. Or as I said above, a mixed-race non-binary person.
If they came to you with the cure for cancer, you would discount it. It's why useless Mr. Ford is premier and not the Old Lesbian, or either chubby blonde lady, or the Asian lady that's been out maneuvering him steady.
It's why people voted for the senile tall white guy who promised to destroy their country instead of the experienced actual-lawyer mixed race lady.
If you claim to want a meritocracy, you have to understand that there are structural barriers that prevent certain people from getting ahead, despite their skills and work rate. And you have to work to reduce those barriers.
You cling to ridiculous, cancerous ideology.
Here's a very plain African woman and South African man (not some generic dumb White American CNN-devotee liberal feminist) explaining why you're wrong, and doing it in a way that lets you know she's disappointed in you.
Last edited:
