Underaged girl allegedly pimped
- Thread starter mandrill
- Start date
There should be the hashed laws for MAKING underage girls work as escorts. Min 20 years, I see it worst than rape.
But not all underage girls are forced in to it, so it need to be a case by case bases.
But not all underage girls are forced in to it, so it need to be a case by case bases.
E
enduser1
"This was far from an equal sharing relationship," Madam Justice Julie Thorburn said, in stating the Crown's case to the jury. He terrorized her with violence, the judge added.
It seems to me like he is not going to be getting much of a fair trial, if the woman judge is telling the jury that "He terrorized her with violence". Of course it is a tabloid so I would not put it past them to twist the Judges words just a little.
EU
It seems to me like he is not going to be getting much of a fair trial, if the woman judge is telling the jury that "He terrorized her with violence". Of course it is a tabloid so I would not put it past them to twist the Judges words just a little.
EU
"The teen became a $300-an-hour escort, with the agency taking $130."
Hmmm. Always wanted to know this with the 18+ girls.
Hmmm. Always wanted to know this with the 18+ girls.
Everybody should get a fair trail--no matter WHAT the charge. Not everybody arrested by the police are guilty.
Why can't people understand that
Why can't people understand that
rubmeister100 said:
Maybe they both are. The judge is wrong if shes assuming what the police are saying has to be true.
Its the jury who decides whos telling the truth--unless the judge is deciding the case.
As for the guy getting the girls money---thats what hes being charged with, he has yet to be found guilty of it, right?
After hes been found guilty, then we can say he was taking the girls money.
I am not sticking up for the low life---if hes guilty--just saying wait until he's found guilty before saying what he did.
IF hes found guilty I hope the judge throws the book at him-sounds like she will.
The Sun is just quoting the judge's summary to the Jury at the end of the trial. She would also be legally required to put the theory of the defence to the jury - i.e. that the girl is lying to set the guy up. But the Sun doesn't bother reporting that facet of the judge's summary because it's not entertaining enough.S.C. Joe said:
Given the pictorial evidence of the injuries the girl received, the guy is unlikely to be believed by the jury anyway and he will be doing some SERIOUS time on this one.
I haven't been following the case.
But yes, I think its called jury instructions, that can take over an hour Don't ask me why.
If it was down in Mexico the defense might say the girl got hit by a car and then the car took off.
But yes, I think its called jury instructions, that can take over an hour
Don't ask me why.If it was down in Mexico the defense might say the girl got hit by a car and then the car took off.
Do stories like this make some of you sit back and think about that young girl you saw and if she's being victimized?
If I thought for even one second that a lady I was seeing was being victimized or under age, I would not hesitate to leave immediately and contact the athourities. I have however not been in that situation for a very long time as I tend to deal with what 'I believe' are well respected and well run agencies and independants.Back Burner said:
Some times getting a good dick suck blinds many to the surroundings. Kind of like not being able to see the forest through the trees.
Example, and add that says, "hot new talent just turned 18, or just came in from .."insert foreign country". Should this be a sign?
Example, and add that says, "hot new talent just turned 18, or just came in from .."insert foreign country". Should this be a sign?
It would be for me, but everybody is different. One more reason I don't use any of the $80 incalls.
Some guys just don't care, what about those guys who slip a pill in their dates drink to knock them out. Those are the same type of guys who don't care about the lady, so long as they are getting a "good deal". Which I wish the police would-if they could-go after the guys dating those underage girls. Like have a sting-and not just to ticket the guys but lock them up for years-run an ad on Craig List saying "young young young girls" and having 13 years olds in a room. If the guy sees her and then pays somebody $$ and gets ready to do her-throw his ass in prison for 20 years. But that be entrapment. And what about the girls being used?
But even if this guy is found guilty and gets locked up for a long time, what about those jerks who dated that girl. They are scott free
But even if this guy is found guilty and gets locked up for a long time, what about those jerks who dated that girl. They are scott free
I agree,, just said people should wait until the person is in fact found guilty in a court of law before saying as a fact what they did.
Why should the agency be off the hook ? Its common knowledge young people use false id, they should double check all of the ids-not just when somebody tips them off.
The police should work willing with the escort companys to help them check the ids, IMO
Why should the agency be off the hook ? Its common knowledge young people use false id, they should double check all of the ids-not just when somebody tips them off.
The police should work willing with the escort companys to help them check the ids, IMO
