Why do you think I'm a WK?freestuff you're definitely a white knight..if emm had a dick, you'd be suckin it no doubt in my mind ya batty boy
Why do you think I'm a WK?freestuff you're definitely a white knight..if emm had a dick, you'd be suckin it no doubt in my mind ya batty boy
Nailed it IMHO. In the strip clubs these white knights are often recognized and trained into becoming 'lap dogs' for some ruthless dancers. Offering car rides, money, doing chores , anything in the vain hope that when the 'bad' boyfriend goes, they will inherit the spoils.White knight or otherwise known as fat ugly bald dude that can't get laid with an inch of 50's in his hand....poor schlepps have been around since before joey buttmyfuoco and his little ho amy fisher.
Not anymore than a child afraid of the dark is a racist. People for generations have feared the night, dark caves, places that our perceptions are weak and the darkness can hide dangers and evil. Black witches, black knights, darth vader .. I mean the head of the Empire wouldn't look half as menacing in a white cape with matching white ensemble.is calling someone a white knight a racist comment?
Man, why do you HATE Emm so much?You and lustforlife are both one for standing up for her constantly despite her childish attitude. So face it. The reason she gets idiot guys to see her despite her lame service is her looks and nothing more. She has NOTHING personality wise.
Sometimes it is the objective reviewer, trying to post his honest experience who really doesn't have the time, sense, stomach or stamina for the brain bashing and mud slinging sure to ensue.Whatever the original etymology, it seems labels quickly get co-opted and conveniently slapped on someone whenever views or actions encroach on others comfort zones or just plain annoy them. Just as some speculate that some white knights have ulterior motive then perhaps it's fair game to suggest that chronic "labelers" do too. It's a magic spell that snares the target square in that old damned if you do, damned if you don't conundrum and frequently shuts up dissenting voice that really doesn't have the time, sense, stomach or stamina for the brain bashing and mud slinging sure to ensue.
This may be true to a certain degree, however there is also a large group of regular, fairly straight forward posters here who are able to see both sides of the bash/wk coin. At some point, it does become obvious who the wk are when no uncomplimentary word may be spoken about a lady without them coming to her immediate defence and then launching an offensive of their own. For the wk, his damsel can do no wrong, no matter the evidence otherwise.
Back pockets are bulging with them - tree hugger, chauvinist, loser, fem-naz, c*$t, racist, soccer mom, momma's boy, deadbeat dad, golddigger, slut, pervert, troll, ad nauseum - handy to toss at opportune time. Particularly handy to folks who are easily threatened or have much at stake in a polarized view, but in lazy or cynical moments they can be awfully tempting to reach for, just like junk food you always regret after the fact.
This is just my bias, but I feel they're frequently handy to those who intrinsically don't really give hoot or holler about the principle of a discourse, just have to win or appear to win. In such instances I don't find it so baffling that some find it impossible to believe that a WK is actually speaking on principle as opposed to a "point scoring" agenda. If you got no real principle at stake then maybe you assume no one else does either. And again, it's my bias, but I feel that these types (I won't label them, but I'm sure someone has/will) are probably more prevalent than WK's trying to score points.
Again, that statement does carry some weight, however you are also being unfair to the members who have seen a lady, posted an honest but less than stellar review of her, only to be assailed by her fan boy wk. There may also be others who have become so tired of pointing out the wks that they just don't bother anymore.
When a member does not post an honest review of an unsatisfactory encounter because he fears he will be pounced upon by her protectors, the rest of the board suffers because they are not warned about possible poor service.
I'm really glad I'm not the only one who has noticed this as well. Any forum is like this however. Men start to feel the need to always be the good guy, so WKs have lots to say about nothing. Others like to be Trolls and make people feel things for nothing better than the self satisfaction they made someone a little less happy with their nonsensical comments.But I'm wondering now whether TERB needs WKs. I hate WKs since they discourage newbies from posting reviews but it seems like there are individuals out there who have vendettas against certain SPs.
Yes. It cuts both ways to be sure. Fair is fair. I'm just saying labels get so inclusive (or do I really mean expansive.) The old, Eskimos (is that PC?) have 50 odd words for snow, how come we're stuck with one for _____ (fill in blank) straight-jacket.Sometimes it is the objective reviewer, trying to post his honest experience who really doesn't have the time, sense, stomach or stamina for the brain bashing and mud slinging sure to ensue.
Well said.Men start to feel the need to always be the good guy, so WKs have lots to say about nothing. Others like to be Trolls and make people feel things for nothing better than the self satisfaction they made someone a little less happy with their nonsensical comments.