Who is the most annoying poster on Terb ?
- Thread starter yahoo40
- Start date
- Status
Personally I dislike anyone who hijacks a thread. BTW, do you think Minnesota will win next week?
Speaking of hijacking threads, is it possible to post a poll on page 8 of a thread? I would like to canvass terbites to see if they think that the women flaming each other here and crying about being flamed are a) pussies b) faggots c) pansies d) little girls or e) heroic internet warriors fighting valiantly for the integrity and decency of hooker review boards everywhere. 
ps. that's supposed to be a yawn.
ps. that's supposed to be a yawn.
That is really low, an inhumane comment that shook me a bit. Your analogy is most insulting to the wonderful members of the Special Olympics, some of whom I know. You should be ashamed of yourself.
The only thing that is fantasyland and make believe is your ability, and ours as well, to have sex with so many beautiful ladies, everything else should not be make believe. In the real world the fact is these ladies wouldn't take a second look at us, so we pay for the experience of being naked, body to body, with gorgeous ladies, that's the true fantasy. Your reviews, comments, and inferences about the ladies are not to be fantasy or make believe, both the hobbyests and the ladies believe what is posted.
Mia, most often, I really enjoy your insight to the threads. I concur the fantasy is our ability to enjoy the pleasures of the flesh with beautiful women whom most wouldn't give us a second look. I know that everytime the door opens I am humbled by the beauty that is before me. Believing what is posted, fundamentally, I disagree with that statement. Do you believe everything that is in the media? If someone said jump would you? Do you find that you need to investigate for yourself regardless of good/bad reviews. One man's pleasure, is another man's pain. That is not meant to demean anyone, but we all do not agree on everything regardless of lady, sport, finance, whatever.
It looks like I have another apology to make. Sometimes I get thoughtless and inconsiderate when I post. The Special Olympics line was a prime example of me acting like a complete ass. I'm sorry for the comment. It was inexcusable
Definition from the dictionary
Legal Dictionary
Main Entry: ca·ve·at
Pronunciation: 'ka-vE-"ät, -"at; 'kä-vE-"ät, 'kA-vE-"at
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin, may he/she beware
1 a : a warning enjoining one from certain acts or practices b : an explanation to prevent a misinterpretation
2 : a notice to a court or judicial officer to suspend a proceeding until the opposition can be heard caveat entered in the probate court to stop the proving of the will> —caveat verb
That was what I meant by a caveat, not a warning
Legal Dictionary
Main Entry: ca·ve·at
Pronunciation: 'ka-vE-"ät, -"at; 'kä-vE-"ät, 'kA-vE-"at
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin, may he/she beware
1 a : a warning enjoining one from certain acts or practices b : an explanation to prevent a misinterpretation
2 : a notice to a court or judicial officer to suspend a proceeding until the opposition can be heard caveat entered in the probate court to stop the proving of the will> —caveat verb
That was what I meant by a caveat, not a warning
Who's talking about believing what you read, obviously when one reads anything in any media, you take it with a grain of salt taking into account the author and motive behind it. I didn't refer to that at all. I said that what you write on this board regarding reviews, comments, and inferences about the ladies are not to be fantasy or make believe, the comments are to be true and factual to the best of your abilities. Some guys adhere to that and others make up BS for whatever reason, but the basic premise still holds, we all should not write make believe, only the facts and truths.
ROTFLMFAO! Now you'll pull a "MEA CULPA" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mea_culpa
It's just semantics now. As I stated before, choose your words more wisely and words that do not have multiple meanings. Easy for you to say that you meant part B. However, Part A clearly illustrates a warning from certain acts/practises. Additionally, the Oxford dictionary simply defines caveat as a warning.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/semantics
general semantics
Function: noun plural but singular or plural in construction
Date: 1933
: a doctrine and educational discipline intended to improve habits of response of human beings to their environment and one another especially by training in the more critical use of words and other symbols
Now, you are the weakest link be gone! Seriously, do you understand now how your words are misinterpreted? And, as I said before, you're probably a decent guy.
Mia, you are talking about what I write and some others do to. I get what you are saying, now please be open minded. What I write in a review regarding services, intimacy. location and the like are all true. I wouldn't say I did this and it didn't happened. I write creatively, romantically, and use humour. I place the disclaimer YMMV right at the top.
My references to the hobby being fantasyland and toys for us is because that is what it is, and don't become over-indulged/over-involved, keep it in perspective. You know every review that I write informs the reader if she lady was sexy, the accommodations appropriate, showers available with clean towels, brought a small gift, bottle, card, oral service, daty, playful touch, if trips to the mediterrean are available, etc. What I build around it is the anticipation and longing. I refuse to write a borning and mundane review. If you have the time go read or reread my reviews, and you'll see that all the important parts are covered in a gentlemanly way. It's really not my job to help anyone search for the informatoin; it's there to find what they want and make use of it. What is so diifficult to contend with. I would believe that if you're going to visit a lady that you're going to your research. If you pm'd me and asked any questions, I would be more than helpful.
So really, there is no need for the drama and fuss. If you have a question pm me and if I can answer it, I most gladly will.
Cliff Claven, now you've done, my momma's dead, now I might go postal! LOL Is there anyway that I could be Woody, you know, he's not the brightest, but he does an honest days work and his fiancee Kelly was so hot! Do you remember the song that he wrote for her too: Kelly, Kelly, Kelly, I love you Kelly! LMAO.
Yes good for you to apologize, but yet again choice of words!
This young basketball player from Rochester has a high functioning level of Autism known as Asperger's Syndrome.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fw1CcxCUgg
This second clip the coaches from both teams, players from both teams and fans from both teams are to be commended for making a dream come true.
http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=4620840&categoryid=3060647
This young athletes are not disabled but differently abled.
You're correct about the purchasing of fantasy time. But what you overlook is that you and your circle jerks write reviews that blow your own horn, presenting yourselves as modern Casanova's that are so pleasing in every way to the ladies concerned. It seems others are dancing around pointing this out, but that's what is being said by the references to self-exalting reviews and the skewed view of client-provider relations. As such, they're fantasies about your own abilties, not fantasies about the abilities of paid professionals to entertain you. The difference is crucial. Most here wish to read reviews of the ladies, not of the circle jerk's self-perceptions. It's this confusion about the boundaries of fantasy-land that I think Brill and Mur11 are pointing to, and they have valid points.
They might not give you a second look. But, anyway . . . again you're right here, this is what the fantasy is about. So it is puzzling why the circle jerks' reviews read like diary entries about how circle jerks wish women perceived them. It's just too much information!
This is probably why you and the circle jerks made the most annoying list in the first place. I do believe you round ones are mostly gentlemanly, in your own fat cat kind of way, and that the inof about the ladies is accurate for the most part. But then you say anyone going to visit a lady can do research, but you don't see helping anyone to do that as your job, but they can PM you directly. Why would anyone want to be PM'g you, especially as you made clear how insignificant you are (quoting you, dude!), just to get info? A review board works best if info is openly shared, but some of the review practices of the circle jerks impede this function (ie: leaving ladies' names off the thread title; reviewing yourselves, not the ladies).
- Status
