I literally told you what he will do.
Looks like you are delirious after that shellacking last night. lmfao.
Who will you be voting for??
- Thread starter Phil C. McNasty
- Start date
Looks like you are delirious after that shellacking last night. lmfao.
I want to take this opportunity to congratulate Carney on winning the election. Although the result is not what I had hoped for, I respect the democratic process.
We finally got rid of Trudeau and Singh. That in itself is a victory! Conservatives picked up a lot of new seats especially in Southern Ontario and will form a very strong opposition.
I'm also relieved that Caney has adopted a significant number of Conservative policies and will put them into effect in the months and years ahead as he campaigned on.
This of course is with the assumption that he will stick to his promises. Among those promises is reducing government, cutting taxes, keeping the carbon tax at 0, controlling immigration, and investing in Canadian natural resources and pipelines (drill baby drill!).
All of that while running a minority government without the help of the NDP to swoop in and prop them up.
We'll all be watching intently of course...
We finally got rid of Trudeau and Singh. That in itself is a victory! Conservatives picked up a lot of new seats especially in Southern Ontario and will form a very strong opposition.
I'm also relieved that Caney has adopted a significant number of Conservative policies and will put them into effect in the months and years ahead as he campaigned on.
This of course is with the assumption that he will stick to his promises. Among those promises is reducing government, cutting taxes, keeping the carbon tax at 0, controlling immigration, and investing in Canadian natural resources and pipelines (drill baby drill!).
All of that while running a minority government without the help of the NDP to swoop in and prop them up.
We'll all be watching intently of course...
Last edited:
I used to think you were naive and ignorant because all the information you rely on came from Youtube...I had no idea you were using AI to find your moral compass!
Now it all makes sense.
PS I'm actually happy that the Libs have a minority government but were elected on the Conservative policies they copied. Which means they either keep their promises and implement those policies or if they stray, they will accomplish nothing and get turfed next election.
Deep down I know you know that's true...if you don't believe me ask your AI app.
Not sure what your story is supposed to mean exactly but I hope you enjoy Carney implementing all those Conservative policies he copied and campaigned on.
This will be fun to watch. A win-win so to speak.
You can ask me why but I think you already know the answer, and if you don't already know the answer, I'm sure your AI aps will tell you.
No all you stated were the general talking points that every candidate said as well.
You said: " Carney proposes to invest in Canada, build more houses, make it more self-reliant, something that will help us be less dependent on the US for while maintaining sovereignty."
Invest in Canada: general comment and common with all party platforms
Build more houses: general comment and common to all party platforms, EXCEPT he neglected to mention his US company would most likely be getting the contracts
Make it more self reliant: general comment and common to all party platforms
Something that will help us be less dependent on the US for while maintaining sovereignty: repetitive and vague and also what all parties mentioned
So basically, he is no different in terms of strategy and ideology, but you've convinced yourself that he has a better plan and strategy and are not able to explain the differences.
You just suck up what the Liberal propaganda machine tells you without asking important questions.
How do you suppose a coalition will work if Carney tries to move the Liberals towards the center? Can he move to the center if he has a coalition with the NDP? Or does Bloc Québécois have more conservative elements?
I'm not sure I have this right, but I am curious how the Canadian system works.
A summary but not exhaustive.
And this is good enough.
What did the glorified sloganeer who lost his own riding produce?
Perhaps a few attractive slogans that appealed to you?
PS: But let me restate what I said earlier.
This election was about ideology. Not policy.
We needed to select a government that would be opposed to the one down south.
We did that.
It used to be that the NDP would prop up the Liberal minority government. After this election that won't be possible because they only won about 1/3 of the seats they had last time.
Similarly, the Bloc lost seats but can make a difference if they want to. Problem is, they typically only want to look out for Quebec and will side with anyone who helps them with that. Everything else could be a toss up.
If you mean a coalition between the Liberals and Conservatives, that's highly unlikely. For one, most of the proposed Liberal policies were actually copied from the Conservative platform. So if they are implemented, they will be supported by the Conservatives. If they're not, then the Conservatives will not support different policies.
Keep in mind that the only reason the Liberals even ended up with a minority is because they managed to convince voters that Carney could handle Trump and US policies better than anyone else. All that, but no substance included that actually explains how. And anything that was offered in this respect was identical to what every other party proposed.
What we'll see over the next 4 years is Liberal supporters realizing that their party is only able to implement Conservative policies, not be able to do anything about Trump's policies, and the Conservatives will win a majority in 4 years like Trump did after 4 years of Democrat rule.
That's why I prefer to talk about specific issues rather than party rhetoric. It's too easy to discuss things in broad generalities that only promote a team color.
Everything in the list was copied from the Conservative platform and what the Conservatives have been proposing for years. You just proved my point.
Ideology doesn't have anything to do with actual policy that affects people's lives.
Being opposed to the one down south is nothing but virtue signaling. No substance. No plan.
You still can't explain what makes Carney any different than any other party leader in that respect. You just voted blindly due to brainwashing.
When every party leader uses the same talking points and proposes the same policies, people are left to decide based on subjective things. That's where cognitive bias comes in.
I heard that Carney wants the government to become a contractor in building more affordable housing. This smacks of a typical liberal solution. Liberals like anything that puts the government front and center in the economy.
In all likelihood, the reality will be very different than the rhetoric. I would stick to incentives and removing regulatory barriers.
Of course.
Some of Trump's policies are not classic conservative policies, but Democrats and Liberal media still try to shout them down anyway.
Last edited:
So all your complaints that the Liberals were going to overspend, was actually a conservative idea?
So if conservatives overspend you have no issue but if Liberals do it is the end of the world?
And if it is the conservative platform you should have no problem with it.
Your criticism doesn't make sense.
And yes, ideology is what mattered in this election.
MAGA ideology was defeated and cast out.
The guy with over a 20 point lead 6 weeks earlier lost his riding.
What part of that reality eludes you?
On a positive note, you guys atleast seem to have won the TERB poll. lmfao.
I think you forgot that we got rid of Pee Pee as well and the Liberal only need the 7 NDP to pass any programs or legislations
Grasp at straws to lessen your tears of your Conservatives blowing a 20 point lead. Your leader losing his seat because he was stupid enough to court the looney anti vax twats in Ottawa. LMAO
Your tears are wonderful, mmmmm mmmm.
That sounds like generalized sloganeering. I kind of know what that means relative to Trump. I have no real idea what that would actually mean for Canada. It kind of sounds like an attempt at a pejorative slogan for anyone that opposes progressive policy-making including more open immigration and controlling the growth of government. Tighter immigration and controlling government spending are probably very popular with Canadian voters.
I'm guessing MAGA sloganeering worked well with older, traditionally Liberal voters.
MAGA is MAGA.
In Canada it is more like MAGA-lite.
No mass deportations for example, but MAGA adjacent messaging.
Canadians got scared and voted Liberal.
Carney's plan is no different in substance. It's just better disguised. A plan to spend billions that we don't have with no projection as to how that money will ever be recovered is, in essence, "the budget will balance itself".
I'd prefer if the Liberals just took all our money down to the Casino and laid it all down on the 00. At least there is a chance that plan would work!
