What is fun is watching you post Breitbart articles and seriously think they are legit.
Why has not one single right winger defended trumps comment....
- Thread starter shack
- Start date
Hardly, we just keep pointing out how hypocritical it is from someone who posts fake news that he didn't even pay for, to attack someone else.
By the way, you keep accusing people of lying and insulting them.
As someone who abides by site rules, I fully expect you to honour the rules and ban yourself.
Unless of course you're a hypocrite.
I did not "admit" that is your assumption. What a presumptuous robot you are. I mentioned that clearing the cache / history was purely a routine that then removes the tracking of an online site. I have every right to do so as that is what all banks and even the Government of Canada RECOMMENDS. Of course you are living in denial of that fact and you cannot understand the meaning of the word "theft" as nothing was stolen. Just your brain probably. Bahahahahahaha!!
Again sitting in Mama's basement and presuming that you know about everyone's life makes you the biggest liar. Just like your allegation of Trudeau's sexual assault against his students. Then you denied ever starting the thread until I posted the link of it. So you are the BIGGEST AND MOST UNTRUSTWORTHY LIAR!!
Again that account is just for one person on one device at a time. They tell you not to share it for your own security and person information. If someone shares it, with a close friend or family member, they maybe in violation but, it is NOT THEFT. Learn the real meaning of that word as you cannot even specify what was exactly stolen. The Toronto Star will not even bat an eyelid if they know of that fact!!
I did not state that "Everyone does it". What liar. I stated that family members are probably doing so, and they have every right to do so, just like husbands may share their own bank accounts with their wives or children even if the account and debit card are only registered in solely their own name. The husband probably pays a monthly fee for that account and then maybe the wife and child do not want to have to pay fees for separate accounts. So you are living in another planet if you cannot comprehend this simple fact!!
.
You are a hypocrite, as you brought up this whole "theft" crap in the thread that was solely about Doug Ford and his car registration number plates. So practise what you preach. I believe that he now may have new number plates..... ONTARIO IS CLOSED FOR BUSINESS. Make sure you purchase them. Bahahahahaha!!
.
Just proved above that you lied wrt to Trudeau, and then of course those Grocery Bills that will go up by 40% based on a 4.4c increase in the Carbon Gas Tax. Were you right or lying or cannot do the most basic math??
.
Yes you lie all day I agree 100%. Also you still cannot specify what exactly I "stole". Especially if I was sharing a subscribers account that she consented to give me access to. It is our own personal agreement and not a hypocrite like you to comment about it!!
You are proving nothing and just making a clown out of yourself. Still have not proven specifically what was stolen!! You are such a funny dude.... Bahahahahahahaha!!
Wow that was a lot of desperate distracting!
The Star's terms of use clearly states you must not share accounts. But somehow you think that sharing an account with your wife and/or family member is not sharing an account? hahaha that's funny
Do you think if that was the case, they would have actually stated it?
When you share an account, it means more than one person is using a subscription. Meaning, someone is getting it for free or a fraction of the price if 1 or more people are splitting the cost.
Meaning, that additional revenue is not being realized by the company.
Meaning you are getting something for free when they haven't consented to giving it to you for free.
Meaning you are stealing from them.
And using it on one device at a time is another one of your bs distractions...so you log in on your device at noon and then log off. Then your friend logs in later on their device. It's still sharing an account.
So does a bank or any other website state that you should not share an account, password, or pin for your own protection. Sharing it with someone else is a risk if tat individual uses it for his own benefit that compromises the privacy or patents of the corporation. But if it is shared in a consensual manner, as there is nothing that is private about the content then what the hell is your problem??Wow that was a lot of desperate distracting!
The Star's terms of use clearly states you must not share accounts. But somehow you think that sharing an account with your wife and/or family member is not sharing an account? hahaha that's funny
Do you think if that was the case, they would have actually stated it?
When you share an account, it means more than one person is using a subscription. Meaning, someone is getting it for free or a fraction of the price if 1 or more people are splitting the cost.
Meaning, that additional revenue is not being realized by the company.
Meaning you are getting something for free when they haven't consented to giving it to you for free.
Meaning you are stealing from them.
And using it on one device at a time is another one of your bs distractions...so you log in on your device at noon and then log off. Then your friend logs in later on their device. It's still sharing an account.
Well if you can share the newspaper with everyone in sight, is that not a loss of revenue then?? Why is it okay in that case, but not so for this account?? What is the difference?? Supposing she did not want to give me access to her account, but printed all the articles that I was interested in reading. Will that still be "stealing"?? Where does it say so?? How about if she passes her device over to me to read?? Is that "stealing"?? I know you will deliberately not answer these questions. Since when did you get concerned about a left wing media like the Toronto Star in this instance but wlll not trust their news??
You are the liar and a fraud in your allegations against Trudeau's sexual assaults. Accusing me of "hacking" the Toronto Star website. The 4.4c of carbon tax on the fuel will raise the grocery bills by 40%. Now you state that this is stealing>. Just you and you alone believe that myth. You are from another planet and needs to learn the true meaning of stealing.
I'm starting to think based on your responses that you are playing stupid to trying to continue to distract from your thievery...but like I said this is sport to me.
Sharing an account in this case, is not about privacy. It's about the company trying to make money by having each subscriber pay for their own account. Otherwise they would provide an option for buying a shared account.
Online accounts offer convenience so people don't have to go out and buy a physical paper. One account per person and no sharing. Why do you have a such a hard time understanding that?
This has nothing to do with a physical newspaper so not sure why you are trying to equate the two...oh wait...it's because you are scrambling to justify your thieving and trying to distract again.
Listen, you are getting more and more ignorant with your petty squabbles that are none of your business. It is just between by friend / tenant and myself that she has consented to give me access to.
Now if I was religiously reading it then I would have subscribed for it, but if it is a random article then no one cares as she reads every single article and I would not like to interrupt her. Only on occasions she may ask me to read a particular article and we can then discuss it. No different from her saying here is my device and just read it. If people have not shared their devices with you then they do not trust you!!
I have access to numerous other TV news networks worldwide and prefer it. So your nonsense about "stealing" knows no bounds. But since when are you concerned about a left wing media when you have criticized them in the past?? If The Toronto Star thinks that this sharing is being abused in violation of the terms then they have the right to terminate the account. No doubt they will be losing the income in that case. I can also read the same articles at my workplace as we have all the newspapers there. Anyway you cannot even fathom that fact. But then you accused me of "hacking" into the Toronto Star account and still cannot explain how I "hacked" into such a site. What a loser!!
Maybe this site is offering "thievery":
https://www.wired.com/story/share-online-accounts-without-sharing-password/
So maybe I should get the "Jam", that they are offering and then no problem. :bounce:
Absolutely true. Sometimes he references no one but starts a thread with no links, just because it is against our PM and his so called sexual assault on his students.
It was initially pedalled by a very fake online alt right Conspiracy Theorists, that many right wingers bought including Boober.
Are you daft?
"just between me and my friend" is sharing? Is that something you have a problem understanding? Doesn't matter if it's between you and your friend or you and I, it's sharing!
And are you seriously suggesting that just because it is "occaisional" sharing, that it's not sharing? It's not about frequency. It's not about proximity. It's not about someone letting you read their screen. It's about sharing.
The Star doesn't have an easy way to determine if you are sharing the account. Why don't you call them and tell them, and then share what they tell you with us? You think they would tell you it's fine? haha
And just because you have "access to numerous other TV new networks and prefer it", has nothing to do with sharing the Star subscription account. One has nothing to do with the other and is another one of your attempts at distraction.
Here's what you did:
I called you out for clearing cookies with the intent of getting more free articles. In the moment, you knew you were caught red-handed, so you panicked.
In your haste to save face, you switched your story to you using a shared account without realizing that was also wrong.
So in a matter of minutes, your story changed twice. You're a liar.
I'm convinced you know the difference and are just playing stupid.
You assume too much and know too little as usual.
What if you just click the x to close the window?
What if you don't regularly log out and leave your browser open on the website?
What if only the terb cookies are cleared when you click the logout button?
What if your browser settings are configured to not automatically clear cookies and history?
Maybe ask your mom to let you back on the computer and test this before trying to look smart?
First of all, for a website that caters to illegal behaviour... most of those habits you just suggested are highly careless and irresponsible from a 'cover your ass' perspective. But it's your life, your liberty, your problem.
Second, are you saying that terb is lying to you when it says "all cookies cleared"?
You make up the stories as you go along. Just like your Trudeau sexual assault on students that you are now very hush, hush with. Remember how you denied it until I posted the link. You are a liar. That is why no one believes your garbage!!
Again how do you know who my friends and renters are from your crevice that you are stuck in?? So cut out that bullshit!!
Your "thievery" allegations means that there are millions of people round the world who are thieves when family members and close friends share articles that they only have access to. More and more ignorance from you by the second. Again I did not clear the "cookies" like you once again are falsely alleging. Just the cache / history that I have been doing for years. If you do not do it, then it is your ignorance. Once again you accused me of hacking into the website. Your stupidity and you will not acknowledge that you are wrong in this respect!!
Yes, I also log out from this site and the cookies are automatically cleared. But I do not specifically clear the cookies. Clearing the history / cache and getting access to the free articles is not stealing. Just in your crevice it is. Likewise, sharing an article with a friend that is not confidential is not stealing. Just in your crevice maybe.
Also, I have asked you these questions and will do so again:
Were you right in starting a thread about that fake news on Trudeau's sexual assault on his students?? Something that you denied doing, so if you ignore answering then you are the biggest liar and perpetrator of fake news.
Is clearing the history / cache not recommended if it then gives you access to free articles, and in spite of being recommended for your own security and confidential information protection purpose??
If you then gain access to the free articles, after clearing the history, then is it considered to be "Hacking" as you alleged??
Finally if the carbon tax that increased by 4.4 cents, resulted in the 40% increase in the grocery bills like you stated according to your mathematical calculations??
Waiting for the answers, that I expect you to once again ignore or sidestep it!!
I don't care who your friends are. Why would that matter exactly? Sharing an account is sharing an account. Period.
You keep switching from your story about clearing your cache to using a shared account. Apparently all of that happened in a few minutes? So which one was it liar?
You asked me to show you the Star's Terms of Use...and then you ignore it.
You're a thief and I caught you. You're a hypocrite who likes judging others and then falls to pieces when he is caught.
Your explaination about clearing your cache and just getting access as a result is like trying to open someone's door and finding it unlocked. Doesn't mean you should enter and use the excuse "it was unlocked and if they didn't want someone to enter they should have locked it".
Hacking: gaining unauthorized access to a computer or system. A website is a system. You circumvented their system despite them not authorizing you for more free articles. You "hacked" their system by clearing the mechanism they use to control the access to free articles.
Deal with it theif.
(this continues to be fun watching you try and deflect and distract like a baby giraffe taking it's first steps)
Hey fake news boober, if you don't have an account with the Star and therefore haven't agreed to any terms or contract, how is clearing your browser history or even your cache 'stealing' or a breach of contract to something you've never agreed to?
So You made fake allegations that I made up the story about sharing the friend's account. Again now you say why does it matter?? So you admit that you were wrong!!
How the hell is it "switching" the story when you know nothing about me. In your first statement you said that you don't care who my friends are. Now you seem to care as you think that I am lying. Again go back to the first post and you will understand the fact that clearing the history used to work when The Toronto Star were offering free articles. They no longer offer these free articles, and the only reason that I posted the link is that I had access to my friend's account. Maybe you will comprehend that fact now!! That is why I mentioned this friend, and how I had access to the article. If I was lying then I could have stated that it is my own account. So I am too honest to folks like you that make a mountain out of a molehill. That is because you are the biggest liar and a stalker that picks on straws!!
Okay you posted the terms of use. So as I clearly mentioned that it is not unique to share an account. It maybe in violation of the terms of use as far as my friend is concerned. But if she is okay with it and fully consents to it, then it is not stealing, especially as I mentioned that I could easily read the full paper version at work and if I missed anything or did not have the time to, then I may read one or two articles from her account. Not worth my suscribing to something where it is a duplication of paper copy that is accessible at work. Can you not understand that simple fact.... you stalker??
Now you cannot admit that you got the "cookies" accusation WRONG!! How can it be "unauthorized" if their site is public for all to gain access to. See you do not know the meaning of "unauthorized". If someone posts a link and I click on it when I view a post how can it be "unauthorized" if all the public has access to it. Especially after I cleared my history for my own security and privacy the previous night?? See you do not know the meaning of "hacking" even though an IT guy corrected you, and yet you make up bullshit and go on and on. Hacking is gaining unauthorized access to an account that is not open to the public and without their permission. This is a proper explanation for what it is intended:
So, what have I added, edited or deleted from that website??
Obviously, when you cannot even spell thief, then you are IGNORANT. So ignorant Boober!!
By the way, there is a discussion on numerous forums about VPNs. Do you know what it is and how it can give you access to TV stations etc in foreign countries?? You might as well throw your two cents in by letting all of them know that they are "thieves" using your "LOGIC":
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?704136-VPN-Are-they-necessary
You are like a bull chasing his own tail Mr Ignorant Boober. But again you ignored the following questions as you had no answers to them:
Were you right in starting a thread about that fake news on Trudeau's sexual assault on his students?? Something that you denied doing, so if you ignore answering then you are the biggest liar and perpetrator of fake news.
Is clearing the history / cache not recommended if it then gives you access to free articles, and in spite of being recommended for your own security and confidential information protection purpose??
If you then gain access to the free articles, after clearing the history, then is it considered to be "Hacking" as you alleged?? [You got this 100% WRONG]
Finally if the carbon tax that increased by 4.4 cents, resulted in the 40% increase in the grocery bills like you stated according to your mathematical calculations??
Waiting for the answers, that I expect you to once again ignore or sidestep it!!
Fake allegations about sharing your friends account? You're the one who said you were using your friend's account? After you changed your original story.
Clearing cookies, clearing history, clearing cache, clearing your ass, ...whatever you cleared that allowed you to get free articles is the point.
You purposely did that and bragged about it. You didn't say anything about clearing anything without knowing it would give you more free articles. You purposely cleared your computer for the sole purpose of getting more free articles.
Is this the part where you start spewing all kinds of distracting statements to continue to avoid facing the fact that you're a liar and got caught while you bragged about how you steal articles?
