Why no reviews of clients?

[D-Fens]

Someone shut down this thread, It is beyond stupid.

 

[sempel]

I do this all the time, but only with the best, well known member ID’s.
So many freebies and extras, lol.

I dare you to try this with mine and report back what happens? I'm honestly curious if you'd get a hug of appreciation or a slap in the face and get told to STFU! Methinks someone has done it given I've been accused of some random shit that I've never done - then again the accuser makes me shake my head so that's that.

 

[Samranchoi]

Seriously guys, use your heads. The only possible purpose of a client review would be to warn other providers about you and there are already ways they can and do that. The rest would be as fake and as useless as any other over-the-top shill review. Why? Because it’s a business and we are the paying clients. Eg: You think you’ll see a review like: “Sempel was a nice guy, a little clueless with a below average sized penis and no skills. Wanted to barter a post fuck massage for a discount. As if! 6/10. Repeat? Yes, but there are better clients out there.” Sorry sempel, but this illustrates how ludicrous the idea is.

Is this the same guy who has been told publicly on this board by at least a couple of women not to contact them anymore and in fact don't even quote them or refer to them. And he still throws in the odd jab. Sounds to me like he isn't that respectful of a person (can't use the word "man" when referring to him because frankly he doesn't deserve it, IMHO). But then again, he is the self professed "gentleman" who many woman think he is a great guy:rofl: well, at least that is what he tells everyone. The way you described him physically reminds me what someone told me about Lovinglife, including being overweight. And they both love playing poker.

 

[legmann]

The board's reason for being is to review escorts. Not the other way 'round.

Why would you be interested in what a lady thought of some other customer?

Seriously guys, use your heads. The only possible purpose of a client review would be to warn other providers about you and there are already ways they can and do that. The rest would be as fake and as useless as any other over-the-top shill review. Why? Because it’s a business and we are the paying clients. Eg: You think you’ll see a review like: “Sempel was a nice guy, a little clueless with a below average sized penis and no skills. Wanted to barter a post fuck massage for a discount. As if! 6/10. Repeat? Yes, but there are better clients out there.” Sorry sempel, but this illustrates how ludicrous the idea is.

Agreed. Ridiculous proposition. The ladies already employ screening/reference requirements; there's little additional benefit in posting client reviews.

 

[Occasionally]

Pretty weird request.

But put it this way, how many "customer review boards" are there out there?

That should give you the answer.

 

[managee]

Seriously guys, use your heads. The only possible purpose of a client review would be to warn other providers about you and there are already ways they can and do that. The rest would be as fake and as useless as any other over-the-top shill review. Why? Because it’s a business and we are the paying clients. Eg: You think you’ll see a review like: “Sempel was a nice guy, a little clueless with a below average sized penis and no skills. Wanted to barter a post fuck massage for a discount. As if! 6/10. Repeat? Yes, but there are better clients out there.” Sorry sempel, but this illustrates how ludicrous the idea is.

Amazing.

The amateur massage for sex thread was sweet.

Sweet like “Corky was really sweet on Life Goes On”-sweet, but still... Adorable.

The board's reason for being is to review escorts. Not the other way 'round.

Why would you be interested in what a lady thought of some other customer?

Seems pretty obvious to me.

Maybe sempel will change your mind on this after 30 or 40 replies.

==

This idea in present form is assine IMO.

That said, maybe I just seriously underestimate the number of guys who use their active username as part of the booking process, or mention TERB in the session.

Imagine the rebuttals?

Plus, it seems like this could lead to even more dishonest reviews / pandering from those members looking for good reviews from the ladies.

Regardless, it seems like a couple of bad client “reviews” would ensure only 1-thing: a new username for the client.

 

[john.who.lee]

This idea in present form is assine IMO.

That said, maybe I just seriously underestimate the number of guys who use their active username as part of the booking process, or mention TERB in the session.

Imagine the rebuttals?

Plus, it seems like this could lead to even more dishonest reviews / pandering from those members looking for good reviews from the ladies.

Regardless, it seems like a couple of bad client “reviews” would ensure only 1-thing: a new username for the client.

i think the vetting is done internally in each agency and the booker knows about your ass more then you do (waay more... ok ?).
you may have letters associated to your phone number ... like: FTM (fxks too much)... and for others: KJ (kill joy)... or D (dirty).
even if only one girl complained... you get the letter.

there... problem solved

 

[Aardvark154]

Why no reviews of clients?

So finally deciding to bother to post: Because they are typically referred to as "bad client lists."

 

[renuck]

Pretty weird request.

But put it this way, how many "customer review boards" are there out there?

That should give you the answer.

What is this weird request you mention? I read the thread a couple times but I think I missed where someone made the weird request you're talking about. Can you quote it so I can follow along?

Thanks!

 

[harryass]

whats the point, we are all 10s to Sps. lol

 

[rhuarc29]

I think for three reasons:

1) Unless you are giving glowing reviews all the time, you are likely to at least alienate some of your client base.
2) Following from (1), an SP doesn't have the luxury of posting an anonymous review. I mean, she could, but she'd have to post from a non-affiliated handle to do so.
3) Identification is an issue. I imagine most clients don't give out their TERB handle, so that's not a reliable means of identification. Phone numbers are the best method, but even that isn't reliable as there are very easy ways to circumnavigate that.

In other words, it's not practical.

 

[great bear]

A partial re-post of when I was reviewed: "Looks like a Bear. Smelt like a combination of blueberries and salmon. Quite hairy. Terrible cunnilingus because of sharp teeth. Toenails unclipped". GB

 

[peepingtom]

The board's reason for being is to review escorts. Not the other way 'round.

Why would you be interested in what a lady thought of some other customer?

Very true. The marketplace is men paying for a woman’s company. A review board serves as a function for the men to make an informed decision before spending money. Do you see merchants reviewing customers on yelp? No.

And there are reviews of bad clients. We don’t see them.

 

[stiffbizkit]

it can't work the other way around because i'm paying. i'm not paying to get critiqued. i'm paying to get banged.

 

[koreanjames]

I was going to say that most johns would have an angry cry while reading their own reviews .... but as always CE says it best .

Client reviews wouldn't likely be on terb, it would cause too much drama from angry trolls or hobbyists who didn't receive the reviews they wanted.

The SPs then would have 3 options: review no one and stay out of drama, review only positive experiences from their personal handle, or have to create a fake handle to write reviews to avoid backlash (isn't that what many terb guys do so they can critique?)

The board culture at times is already a pissing contest between long time members who think they hold clout and super reviewers who think because they can afford to book often and review often they are more valuable members. Any threat to this would cause problems for not only the SPs but the moderators too and clients wouldn't want to pay to support terb so that's extra work for mods to deal with (complaints and potential drama)

If a hobbyiest received a negative public review then he is less likely to ever provide his handle again or give screening info or take it out on that SP or the next SP if he's particularly bent out of shape. So this doesn't make it safer for SPs either.

If it went the way of flowery kissing up reviews then it wouldn't really mean anything and other guys would be fed up reading it and SPs would probably tire of having to write such things to ensure they don't rub anyone the wrong way.

If there was another board, and it was anonymous - maybe. But we already have a problem with SPs not passing on blacklist info as it is, most of the time it's kept to themselves, so in reality few SPs would want to spend more time trying to figure out their clients board handle and then publicly reviewing them.

Not to mention how many guys get jealous even on twitter when they see their fave interacting with another, as soon as there's a record of everyone who's seen her it can escalate problems. I've heard stories of hobbyists even fighting at Spas when they see a guy they don't like and know he's going to see his fave and he has to wait.

While it would initially maybe hold some guys accountable it would probably deteriorate quickly, be criticized as untrue if the Sp had anything bad to say (like he was a little too rough or stayed over time) and then guys would get even more secretive and possibly it would hurt the SPs business or put her in danger if someone was really mad at her. Don't underestimate a jealous or scorned person, it's not pretty.

Not every client who just shows up pays and showers is a 10. That should be the bare minimum for a decent client. If a client is polite, kind and follows your boundaries and respects our time well then that's a little more likely to make them a very desirable client. Tipping is never expected, it's only occasional so that can put you over the top, but that alone doesn't make you a great client, nor does it mean anyone who doesn't tip wouldn't be a great client.

The less desirable aren't just those who have terrible hygiene, but could be bossy demanding ones who want to direct the entire session, go way overtime and won't leave, show up super late and expect their full appointment time, have really scratchy stubble and grind it into you, are too rough and bite/pinch too much so you're sore etc.

 

[Sophia Sinclair]

Here's two good reasons why:

https://nowtoronto.com/news/let-s-rate-the-johns-instead/

Gratifying for those of us who have refused reviews all along are the women who have begun to make their own public evaluations of these men, branding them "slobbyists" and taking their grievances to Twitter feeds like @FCK_TER_ and @ShitPunters. Have a read. Scintillating stuff.

I was researching something else and this popped up. Wowzers!

 

[bluebro69]

I was researching something else and this popped up. Wowzers!

Wow. Makes me think. Thanks Sophia.

 

[Jasmine Raine]

Here's two good reasons why:

https://nowtoronto.com/news/let-s-rate-the-johns-instead/

Gratifying for those of us who have refused reviews all along are the women who have begun to make their own public evaluations of these men, branding them "slobbyists" and taking their grievances to Twitter feeds like @FCK_TER_ and @ShitPunters. Have a read. Scintillating stuff.

I was researching something else and this popped up. Wowzers!

I actually follow @FCK_TER_

Some of the stuff is kinda funny. Some is over the top

 

[yermama]

https://nowtoronto.com/news/let-s-rate-the-johns-instead/

Gratifying for those of us who have refused reviews all along are the women who have begun to make their own public evaluations of these men, branding them "slobbyists" and taking their grievances to Twitter feeds like @FCK_TER_ and @ShitPunters. Have a read. Scintillating stuff.

I think some of these escorts deserve what they are getting. If you act like a piece of shit, you should be treated like one, regardless of where you are, what your gender is, or what kind of job you are doing. They expect special treatment and every guy to be all nice and do what they are asking just because they are "Sex Workers."

Let's see if I will be featured. :yo:

 

[sempel]

Here's two good reasons why:

https://nowtoronto.com/news/let-s-rate-the-johns-instead/

Gratifying for those of us who have refused reviews all along are the women who have begun to make their own public evaluations of these men, branding them "slobbyists" and taking their grievances to Twitter feeds like @FCK_TER_ and @ShitPunters. Have a read. Scintillating stuff.

I was researching something else and this popped up. Wowzers!

Great post - funny and enlightening read.