There was just one complainant in this 'you know who' induced kerfuffle. It was the 'coward' and 'blowhard' aka 'you know who'.“There was no evidence to substantiate a criminal charge,” Vella said.
But Fuji assured us that Ford had committed a crime or three.
Now had Daniel Dale gone all 'Ford-serk' as the 'complainant' had and cried to the police(and the media, and any and all good folks within bellowing range) that he was the victim then an investigation into 'you know whose' actions that evening would have been undertaken.
Be clear my fine-feathered 'defenders' of the indefensible, the only investigation undertaken by the police was premised by 'his' complaint and thus the only actions investigated were those by the 'victim', Daniel Dale.
But as we have all come to realize, some from the very outset of 'his' mayorship, some more slowly, some ever slower still with a dawning dread of disgust and contempt and even those still depserately clinging onto any sliver of hope for 'you know who', the only person's actions that fateful evening that were criminal were 'you know whose'.
Why you 'folks' cling onto the slightest scintilla of 'hope' for 'you know who' is beyond comprehension.
Last edited: