RItchie, do you need me to refer a dentist buddy???? I can't take looking at those teeth!!!!Damn, Squeezy...didn't know you had that on your street rep... all i know is that you CAN'T tell a person's gender based on genialia...
Russell Brand charged with rape and sexual assault
- Thread starter Phil C. McNasty
- Start date
Dubious character, interesting, so Brand and Tate are of dubious character. OK....
I will say it will be hard to stop an 18-year-old but if it was my daughter it would be something like this
"You're not going and if you do, I am changing the will."
I was in the Depp camp because of Heard's character. In the case of Johnny, I don't believe any other women came out against the man. He has a serious drinking problem, but Heard definitely has a mental issue. Brand and Tate both have more than 1, 2 and 3 plus women coming forward. Where there is smoke, there is fire and Tate pretty much admitted to it on more than several occasions. THEY ARE POS!
How could Trump never been involved in anything related to Tate when he brought him back to the United States?
Again though, this thread is about Russell Brand.
It's mind-boggling to me why you let these Tate brothers get under your skin so much.
If the Tate brothers are rapists I hope they burn in hell.
Same goes for Russell Brand.
But I prefer to wait until I see all the evidence
Lmfao. Unlike yourself, not a penny. But I do have fun stringing them along as long as possible and then curse them out in their native language when they catch on. Once you're a grown up you might be able to give it a try but for now I recommend just hanging up. You're incapable of outsmarting them at this point so it's best not to play with fire.
I lump Tates, Brand and Diddy all in the same bowl of soup. ALL POS SHIT or in other words a hot steaming bowl of
soup.I do find Tate entertaining, though, but that doesn't take away that he is a POS.
Legally, it depends entirely on the jurisdiction.
In Canada, for instance, they are the same thing.
In New York they aren't.
Although the definitions now are different than the definitions were in 1995, which played a role in Trump's trial.
What Trump was found liable of would be rape in 2025, it just wasn't legally defined as rape in 1995.
You are correct...it's really not that difficult to not allow nudity on public streets regardless if it's gay or straight people. The streets are public. That means kids are allowed to be there. It's not a private event in a private space.
So rather than banning people based on their age in public areas, how about keeping it in your pants? Is that too difficult?
No one says public events need to have nudity. Has nothing to do with anything other than exhibitionism. You want nudity? Have it in a private space.
Don't make this political.
Expedited removal has a different process and does not require the same due process.
Everyone should know that especially those who supported Obama...he deported more people than anyone and a significant portion of those were under the expedited process.
So no, it's not a "Trump thing". Obama was actually known as the "Deporter In Chief" based on his deportation record.
No. You are spreading misinformation again. As of 1983, (Bill C-127) there is no offence of "rape" in Canada. It is now 3-tiered definition of sexual assault.
Throwing around the "rape" term is incorrect when referencing Canadian law.
But who cares about details when we're speaking about laws right?
If Trump had been tried in criminal court, Carroll would have lost. Everyone knows that and you know that as well.
In civil court, the burden of proof is far less. It basically comes down to he said /she said.
So you can't say if this happened in Canada things would be different in terms of the verdict/charge and that things are equivalent because this charge would have been dropped if it had gone to criminal court.
Saying that outside of New York, he would have been convicted of rape is pure fantasy.
pats Skoob on the head
I see you've learned your talking points.
But you know very well we aren't talking about expedited removal.
(Which has its own problems, both with how Obama used it and how Trump expanded it.)
You certainly don't.
I've been pointing out there is no crime of rape in Canada for ages here.
So yes, there is no legal difference in Canada, there is only the crime of sexual assault.
Which is what I just said.
Whether or not "sexual assault" and "rape" refer to different things in the law is entirely a jurisdictional question.
And?
That's entirely irrelevant to the question that was asked.
It's also entirely irrelevant as to whether or not he did it, as you know.
No one has said otherwise.
I never said a fucking thing about him being tried in Canada, why are you even bringing this up?
I didn't say that either.
I said that the actions he was found liable for in New York would be considered rape in New York now.
This is legally accurate.
I know that upsets you, but the law is the law.
We are indeed talking about expedited removal and why the process is different.
But nice try distracting away from that point.
btw Are you still shocked that your hero Obama deported more people than anyone else? That inconvenient truth doesn't quite jive with the narrative you're trying to peddle does it?
More examples of you dancing around the points you have desperately tried to make then dancing some more when being called out.
Give it up already, you're not that good at hiding your tracks.
Apparently you believe the "law is the law" except for when it doesn't fit your narrative.
You know we aren't.
We are talking about the Aliens Enemies Act.
This is very important to you, so I know you wouldn't make such an obvious mistake.
Why the fuck would you think Obama was a hero of mine?
What a weird idea.
Also, we've discussed this.
Trump being incompetent about deportation and protecting the border doesn't seem to be something you would want to brag about.
You really hate actually looking at the laws and their context, don't you?
Why so fragile?
I never mentioned the Aliens Enemies Act. The discussion was about due process for those being deported.
Your penchant for demonizing Trump comes with you conveniently omitting the facts that Obama in some ways was worse. Hence, Obama must be your moral compass otherwise you would state the facts.
