NDP introduces radical bill demanding Canada convert entirely to green energy
Will you all freeze to death in the Winter for a Net Zero World?
- Thread starter canada-man
- Start date
Such question has very little merit IMO.
Net zero emission goal is not for real. It is set
by politicians in the west to sucker climate sheeple
voters. Rising carbon emission is the more likely
outcome of voting those politicians to power. It
would be more fun to demand supporters of net
zero to take the lead to reduce their own carbon footprint.
Net zero emission goal is not for real. It is set
by politicians in the west to sucker climate sheeple
voters. Rising carbon emission is the more likely
outcome of voting those politicians to power. It
would be more fun to demand supporters of net
zero to take the lead to reduce their own carbon footprint.
Rebel Media is not journalism.
The head is the locus of the maximal heat loss from a human body. So if one buries it deep into the nether regions, one could conceivably stay warm for ever.
yeah the left figures they can stay warm by having their head stuck up their ass
The right wing don't mind killing their kids and grandkids as long as they can declare they understand science better than NASA.
Declaring they are right and scientists are evil and corrupt just makes them feel like part of a tiny, tiny crowd who are the very few that understand science and what's going on.
if you had anything that remotely resembles a clue you would know science theory is correct or it is incorrect.The right wing don't mind killing their kids and grandkids as long as they can declare they understand science better than NASA.
Declaring they are right and scientists are evil and corrupt just makes them feel like part of a tiny, tiny crowd who are the very few that understand science and what's going on.
this is
just bullshit rhetoric
the simple fact of the matter is 400 parts per million of an inert trace atmospheric gas does not control our extremely complex and constantly evolving climate
the other simple fact of the matter is net zero is a completely unachievable , ridiculous and very dangerous pipe dream
OK
Incorrect
You would fail high schools science and university with this idiotic argument.
And the NDP is not a political party or climate experts.
We can't have kids or grand kids living in 15 minute cities anyways.The right wing don't mind killing their kids and grandkids as long as they can declare they understand science better than NASA.
Declaring they are right and scientists are evil and corrupt just makes them feel like part of a tiny, tiny crowd who are the very few that understand science and what's going on.
The NDP is a political party and they refer to scientists who are the experts.
15 minute cities are great.
You should try it.
says the high school drop out
the simple fact of the matter is 400 parts per million of an inert trace atmospheric gas does not control our extremely complex and constantly evolving climate
is a very clear and accurate statement
The NDP is a political joke and they refer to who ever will back their failed socialist agenda
how about you confine yourself within 15 minutes of downtown Kimmirut
i am sure you could still manage to work the welfare state there as well
Are we back to using Anti-Jimmy-Carter arguments?
Turns out Conservatives DO like recycling.
Turns out Conservatives DO like recycling.
Johhny are you still angry that Catherine McKenna flushed The Mighty PP out of Ottawa, almost as enraged that she wont sit on your face?
As for all Canadians moving to Jamaica, I'm for that.
nope
i am just disappointed that an evil manipulative elitist bitch like Catherine McKenna has any political power/ influence
why you continue to entrust corrupt people is a bewilderment
the only explanation is that you are just not very bright
Mr science, I love that you are doubling down on your stupidity with an unsourced chart with hand drawn comments. This proves that not only do you not understand the basics of the field you claimed to know, you also don't know how to do basic research.
For instance, if I link to the live NASA site that explains CO2's role in the greenhouse effect you'll note a few things.
1) NASA directly says your claim is 'incorrect'
2) they provide the data on the increases
3) they provide links to other scientific agencies directly
Key Takeaway:
Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere warms the planet, causing climate change. Human activities have raised the atmosphere’s carbon dioxide content by 50% in less than 200 years.
I suggest you go through the NASA kids section and see if you can understand it.
Come back later and tell us why you think NASA aren't as smart as you and show us your homework.
Why Is Carbon Important?
We are returning carbon to the air much faster than nature took it out!
Again, larue.
You can't even understand the kids page at NASA.
Why Is Carbon Important?
We are returning carbon to the air much faster than nature took it out!
