So now you have gone from enthusiastic consent to no. What is it? What if its not a no, but a nervous, ok I guess I can try...?
Report: Five members of Canada’s 2018 WJC team told to surrender to London Police
- Thread starter bazokajoe
- Start date
That is not enthusiastic consent.
You need to confirm again, and give them an out.
She takes Alex Formenton by the hand and leads him into the restroom...He goes to put on a condom but she says he doesn't have to because she is using birth control...That sounds pretty enthusiastic to me, lol.
The only reason he stepped up was because she was calling them pussies for not wanting to have intercourse with her.
Please quote your source for this statement.
This is sections 269 through 273 of the Criminal Code of Canada. Sexual assault, and the sentencing protocols, are described in sections 271-273.
Common sense.
Are you one of those people who argues that if it not determined in a court of law, rape hasn't occurred?
So you just made that part up about the enthusiasm. Gotcha.
btw, Robert Prevost was named Pope, when Francis died.
Yes they dont often get reproted.
Not sure what that has to do with what I said.
Last edited:
No, consent has to always be enthusiastically and continuously provided.
It is common sense but since you insist you have none, here is something that may help you.
What Consent Looks Like | RAINN
The laws vary by state and situation, but you don’t have to be a legal expert to understand how consent plays out in real life.
The balls on the guy.
And unapologetic about it.
Let's see if mandrill, a.k.a. Perry Mason steps in to give him a scolding now.
I've been to jacks in London, its kind of a dive bar. Possibly this girl was relatively average looking and was smitten by these guys. I played ohl several decades ago and there was always willing girls around. I was a fringe player but the main guys always had their pick of the high school girls.
C'mon use your heads.
The judge herself said that this was not a finding that sex was consensual, but rather that she was left with reasonable doubt due to the inconsistencies in the girl's statements.
"Not meeting the burden of proof" is not equal to "She lied" or "Everything happened the way it should have".
The verdict is what it is, but making a video after the event is sus.
If everything was fine why would they need to?
RAINN is an American non-profit organization, with no legal status in the Canadian criminal justice system.No, consent has to always be enthusiastically and continuously provided.
It is common sense but since you insist you have none, here is something that may help you.
What Consent Looks Like | RAINN
The laws vary by state and situation, but you don’t have to be a legal expert to understand how consent plays out in real life.rainn.org
Was there actual evidence of this ? Or according to who's testimony did this come from ? The players, or teammates ?
