I suppose you'd apply the same standards that "cops always have to win a fight" and say the same thing about every male cop who were beat up on the job.
Crying female cop
- Thread starter Birf
- Start date
Doesn't matter if they are getting beat up in a fight.
The odds in a fight between LE and thugs are not straightforward.
In the US a female cop may just shoot the guy whereas in the UK they don't even carry a gun.
Here is a female cop in Australia who confronted a mass murderer and killed him.
Plus you realize that policing is teamwork anyway.
Bottomline: You cannot make sweeping statements based on gender like that. Its stupid.
A Sydney police officer confronted a mass murderer. Her backup was a carpenter and construction worker wielding bollards
On 13 April 2024, two shots ended Australia’s worst mass murder in more than a decade. As an inquest continues, the question remains: what more could have been done?
www.theguardian.com
No you cannot.
I just provided an example that shows you an instance where a female cop didn't lose a fight.
The majority of police work isn't physical altercation anyway and most importantly it is TEAMWORK. It isn't a prize fight.
So such studies are useless in making sweeping determinations on whether women should serve at all.
You use these threads to grind your teeth to exhaustion, about women and trans women but it isn't going to change the fact that women can, have and will continue to serve in both the armed forces and the police.
It also doesn't change the fact that gender identity and sex are not the same things and that my refusal to sleep with someone I am not attracted to, doesn't take away from that fact.
Unless you have something new to say, I suggest you just move on and may be try to come to terms with reality.
Oh and don't mess with female cops tomorrow thinking you are a man and you are stronger. You may get hurt in the process.
Last edited:
Felt bad for that cop. A system that put her face to face with an angry thug is a system that needs to be "tweaked" a little.
Agree with @Shaquille Oatmeal that policing is team work but there's a reason men don't compete with women in all kinds of competitions.
I'm all for women doing police work and handling guns and chasing criminals etc. but when it comes to wrestling with
and arresting them it's a different ball game altogether. I sparred in my youth and even a 1-2kg difference felt like you're up against a heavy weight.
Here's a case in point, shouldn't really shock anyone who's ever played football (aka soccer) with girls,
Luzern (U15 boys team) dominated and crushed the Swiss women's national soccer team.
sports.yahoo.com
Agree with @Shaquille Oatmeal that policing is team work but there's a reason men don't compete with women in all kinds of competitions.
I'm all for women doing police work and handling guns and chasing criminals etc. but when it comes to wrestling with
and arresting them it's a different ball game altogether. I sparred in my youth and even a 1-2kg difference felt like you're up against a heavy weight.
Here's a case in point, shouldn't really shock anyone who's ever played football (aka soccer) with girls,
Luzern (U15 boys team) dominated and crushed the Swiss women's national soccer team.
U15 Boys Dominate Women's National Soccer Team
It's never a good sign when a national team loses to a team of players about half their age. Unfortunately, that was the case in a recent friendly between a women's national team and a teenage team. On Wednesday, the Switzerland women's national team played the Under-15 boys team representing FC ...
sports.yahoo.com
Last edited:
Yeah, nobody is saying men aren't stronger than women.
Bucktee seems to be arguing that because men are stronger than women, we shouldn't have female cops at all.
Teamwork and the number of policing interactions resulting in physical altercations are far less than ones that don't.
For example, you don't need a strong male cop to do a routine traffic stop or some other.
Last edited:
I like this video from the animal kingdom. Police squads are not a wolf pack but they can learn a lot from wolf pack formations.
The most experienced and the elite are in the front.
I watched the whole video on YouTube.
She walked into the situation like she was tough but they (cops) lost control really fast.
I'd say lack of training or incompetence with all the cops involved is what caused this situation.
As a cop you should be able to at least control whoever is in front of you in a physical confrontation.
Suppose your routine traffic stop turns out to be not so routine...Then what?
Start to cry...
She shouldn't be out in the field...She doesn't have the mental or physical ability to handle it when the going gets rough.
I wouldn't want her watching my back.
Wonder how many cops will have to be fired with that standard needing to be true every single time.
3 questions for the OP and everyone who agrees with him:
1. Do you see SPs?
2. If so, you share these views with them?
3. If so, do they appear to like you?
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
1. Do you see SPs?
2. If so, you share these views with them?
3. If so, do they appear to like you?
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Most traffic stops are conducted by a single officer so your comment has no merit.
You must be fresh out of high school to be so lacking in basic logic.
Most traffic stops do not result in any use of force.
Something like 1% involve use of force during a traffic stop.
You must not have even attended high school to be so lacking in basic logic that you'd try to pass off outliers as the norm and support the extraordinary conclusion that women not be allowed to serve entirely.
You made reference to a team to handle the situation but a single female officer is more likely to hurt or killed even if 1% of stops result in violence.
Yes and far less than 1% of the time, women fail where men succeed, during a use of force incident.
It is such an outlier that a demand to not employ female officers isn't justified.
Last edited:
