Carney platform promises $130B in new spending, deficits until 2029 :Heart Attack:
- Thread starter DesRicardo
- Start date
So, it accomplished nothing, because as bver said earlier, it didn't lower things, and now you are telling me we should believe that the dodgy accounting meant people got more?
So what then was the point?
Why not just admit it was shitty policy?
Voting for carney is just voting for Justin. Justin hand picked him. They’re both pieces of shit.
No it wasn't the moment Trudeau stepped down. It was almost 3 months later. It was primarily based on the moment Trump said he was imposing tariffs and Carney fooled the Liberal flock into thinking he would shield Canada from any harm if they made him PM even though he wasn't elected and was a multi-national.
It was also the moment Carney started adopting Conservative platform items such as getting rid of the carbon tax, immigration control, etc.
lol Criminal Carney was the boss at Brookfield.
Carney owes China a favour, Is in bed with the WEF.
He will run up more debt than Trudeau and give the money to companies he has a vested interest in. It's not even hidden.
10 years of Liberal fuck ups and still making excuses. Grow up and be a man.
Last edited:
have you noticed the legacy media really ramping up their anti polievre redderick as the polls tighten.
Carney assumed office on March 14 and Trudeau was PM until then.
April, is the election.
A month later.
He wasn't in office. There was (and still is) no parliament and he fucked off to go party in Europe.
Liberal apologists are funny.
So you try and explain this by saying 1) people are dumb, and 2) that the policy made sense for 6 years until they were going to lose an election, so at that point the climate didn't matter.
Did I get that right?
Are people also dumb for believing the Liberals are actually telling the truth about anything?
6 years of people being forced to pay a carbon tax fixed the climate. The Liberals said so. That's why they are cancelling the carbon tax because it worked! Action was taken and mission accomplished!
Unless of course you believe they cancelled it because they were about to lose an election and the climate "concerns" took a back seat to that? Say it isn't so Bver!!!
The first job of any politician is to get elected so they can do what they think is right. Climate still matters and Carney has said that. The goals of the carbon tax will be achieved upstream in ways that are less efficient and cost more. That is what stupid gets you.
yeah sure...a PM with no Parliament and absent from the country.
Liberal apologists are funny.
So if their first job is getting elected, that explains why you're swallowing all the bs they are feeding you just to get your vote.The first job of any politician is to get elected so they can do what they think is right. Climate still matters and Carney has said that. The goals of the carbon tax will be achieved upstream in ways that are less efficient and cost more. That is what stupid gets you.
The carbon tax was a scam. They couldn't keep it going without risking losing the election so they cancelled it overnight.
They pivoted from the climate, to Trump...you are being played.
That's what the party you support is capable of doing.
So, then lie to voters about intentions?The first job of any politician is to get elected so they can do what they think is right. Climate still matters and Carney has said that. The goals of the carbon tax will be achieved upstream in ways that are less efficient and cost more. That is what stupid gets you.
It's that kind of elitism that people are voting against.
No we are not on track for 4°C warming. The linear trend is about 0.15°C/decade based on the global dataset of satellite records from Jan 1979- Mar 2025. And that pretty much agrees with what the trend is showing from the weather stations. In 1950 the average global temperature was 13.9°C and in 2024 it was 15.1°C. That's 1.2°C over 75 years which equates to 0.16°C per decade.
Stop with the alarmist crap and look at the facts.
Its not a lie, the intent is to reduce carbon, that has not changed. Other measures will be used to achieve the same goal. Less efficient measures.
