How sad. Next you're going to complain that the military is allowed to own LAWs but you're not.Conservation Officers are culling wolves in BC with assault...er..."patrol" rifles.
Rules for thee, not for me.
How sad. Next you're going to complain that the military is allowed to own LAWs but you're not.Conservation Officers are culling wolves in BC with assault...er..."patrol" rifles.
Rules for thee, not for me.
But it does shit all over your argument about semi-autos being detrimental to hunting; when Conservation Officers are issued assault...er..."patrol" rifles, with "high capacity" magazines. What do they "need" those for, unleashing rapid fire on an injured deer?How sad. Next you're going to complain that the military is allowed to own LAWs but you're not.
Warrant Officer Snipers go after moving targets that have the ability to shoot back, not deer. Again, you don't know anything about shooting or aiming because of your uneducated comment about what's known as a follow up shot. EVERY shot taken at a moving object you want to take down is an aimed deliberate shot. As well, shooters HOLD for windage and ranging and DIAL for elevation. No one, and I mean no one can accurately dial a turret while tracking a target faster than they can cycle the bolt. Since you've done neither, you wouldn't know that of course.What a surprise. You didn't answer my questions. Go ask your Warrant. He will tell you it is stupid to shoot at a moving animal after missing your first shot without taking the time needed to reacquire aim. In that circumstance, the ability to fire again in a second with a semi-auto is no advantage. Hunters tend not to be firing with military grade rifles over 2K+ distances so if they miss their first shot on a stationary target at 100 m, the chance of hitting the target as the animal flees is far less (it would take easily as much time to adjust your sites for windage as it would to charge the bolt).
Again, a semi-auto does not provide any benefit but does create more risk. All you're doing with the military talk is confirming my opinion that you're more concerned about having macho guns than effectively using a tool for hunting.
But they doSemi-auto rifles don't provide any added utility as a tool
You're trying to reason with someone who loves his soapbox. Doubt he ever fired a gun in his life. Even Navy SEALS don't always hit their target on the first shot.Warrant Officer Snipers go after moving targets that have the ability to shoot back, not deer. Again, you don't know anything about shooting or aiming because of your uneducated comment about what's known as a follow up shot. EVERY shot taken at a moving object you want to take down is an aimed deliberate shot. As well, shooters HOLD for windage and ranging and DIAL for elevation. No one, and I mean no one can accurately dial a turret while tracking a target faster than they can cycle the bolt. Since you've done neither, you wouldn't know that of course.
You're the one that needs a lesson in aiming and shooting from an instructor, not me. It's pretty obvious who goes out and shoots, makes mistakes, gets coaching, learns, practices and trys again and who sits behind a keyboard and doesn't do anything but make up scenarios with perfect outcomes because they are a fantasy.
Got any more shooting tips that are contrary to reality?
Every time you post, you post something wrong. Every single time.
Is your argument is that the government always chooses the most efficient solution? If so, I'm sure you'd support a gun registry including striation patterns.But it does shit all over your argument about semi-autos being detrimental to hunting; ...
So why do you keep bringing this up in regards to hunting?Warrant Officer Snipers go after moving targets that have the ability to shoot back, not deer....
Are you going to explain why a semiautomatic rifle is a better choice for hunters than a bolt action or are you just going to whine like the rest?Guys please do yourselves a favor and stop arguing with basketcase. No clue what he is talking about.
There is no clear cut answer. Some hunters prefer a semi, and some others prefer a single bolt.Are you going to explain why a semiautomatic rifle is a better choice for hunters than a bolt action or are you just going to whine like the rest?
And what exactly are the advantages to using a semi-auto rifle for hunting under Canadian laws? I've suggested that they are less accurate (in the same price range) and that the ability to immediately fire a second hurriedly aimed shot while hunting has no real benefit (and creates a risk to anyone else out in the woods). On the other hand, a semi-auto creates more risk to people like the cops in Innisfil as there is less time between rounds fired. If they aren't any more useful (and perhaps less useful) but more dangerous, there's no justification for them being allowed.There is no clear cut answer. Some hunters prefer a semi, and some others prefer a single bolt.
Each type of rifle has its advantages and disadvantages.
...
Just by your answer . I know you are not a hunter . Many use a semi because they may miss the first shot . So shoot a second time . Most people hunt in a group . They plan where they will be so you are not shooting towards others in you party . Pretty well everyone wears high visibility vest . A Browning semi is just as deadly as the SKS .And what exactly are the advantages to using a semi-auto rifle for hunting under Canadian laws? I've suggested that they are less accurate (in the same price range) and that the ability to immediately fire a second hurriedly aimed shot while hunting has no real benefit (and creates a risk to anyone else out in the woods).
You must be one of those "violence is never the answer" types. By now, you have lived long enough to know that's absurd.The SKS used in this shooting was designed as a military rifle so it's no surprise that it makes a good choice to kill people.
Because there's no difference. The marksmanship principles are the same no matter what the target, but since you've never shot anything in your life, of course you don't know that.So why do you keep bringing this up in regards to hunting?
And are you admitting that when you miss an animal with your first shot, you just keep shooting as it runs away? I really hope you at least take the time to be aware of other hunters or hikers in the woods.
BTW, here's what Canadian military sniper use.
They must have made a mistake when they listed it as bolt action thoughC15A2 .50 Calibre Long Range Sniper Weapon - Canada.ca
The C15A2 .50 Calibre Sniper Rifle is the designated Long Range Sniper Weapon (LRSW) for the Canadian Forces. The C15 series of rifle has been in service since 2000, but began being updated to the A2 variant in 2017.www.canada.ca
![]()
As has already been explained to you, some people are better marksmen than others. Thats why some prefer to hunt with a semi instead of a single bolt.And what exactly are the advantages to using a semi-auto rifle for hunting under Canadian laws? I've suggested that they are less accurate (in the same price range) and that the ability to immediately fire a second hurriedly aimed shot while hunting has no real benefit (and creates a risk to anyone else out in the woods)
FYI the most popular sniper rifle in the world is the Barrett M82, which is a semi-automatic rifleSo why do you keep bringing this up in regards to hunting?
And are you admitting that when you miss an animal with your first shot, you just keep shooting as it runs away? I really hope you at least take the time to be aware of other hunters or hikers in the woods.
BTW, here's what Canadian military sniper use.
They must have made a mistake when they listed it as bolt action thoughC15A2 .50 Calibre Long Range Sniper Weapon - Canada.ca
The C15A2 .50 Calibre Sniper Rifle is the designated Long Range Sniper Weapon (LRSW) for the Canadian Forces. The C15 series of rifle has been in service since 2000, but began being updated to the A2 variant in 2017.www.canada.ca
![]()
I've never hid the fact I don't find hunting an enjoyable past time.Just by your answer . I know you are not a hunter . Many use a semi because they may miss the first shot . So shoot a second time . ..
Nice strawman. But why should I rely on the actual government site to see why weapons the Canadian military uses.Now you're an expert on the Canadian military?
Did you read the site because the stated purpose of that rifle is to destroy equipment and vehicles which tend to be larger and easier to hit than human targets. Everything else on that list is bolt action.FYI the most popular sniper rifle in the world is the Barrett M82, which is a semi-automatic rifle
...
Since you're too lazy to use the internet. It's a chronic problem with you.Nice strawman. But why should I rely on the actual government site to see why weapons the Canadian military uses.
Your whole argument about what the military does which just reinforces my suspicion that you're more interested in the feeling the gun gives you than the actual use of them.
And you never answered whether your warrant officer would endorse hurriedly reacquired shots on a moving animal in an unsecured hunting area.