I believe Harper's hero is Bobby Orr.WoodPeckr said:Give Harper time, give him time.......
Stevie's Hero is Dubya, no???.
I don't think he really likes Bush but is forced to be nice to him because he's Dubya's bitch.
I believe Harper's hero is Bobby Orr.WoodPeckr said:Give Harper time, give him time.......
Stevie's Hero is Dubya, no???.
LOL!lookingforitallthetime said:I don't think he really likes Bush but is forced to be nice to him because he's Dubya's bitch. At least that's what the weenie squad says.
Why, did you know Churchill.?lookingforitallthetime said:Really? You thought that was well said?
Let's face it, twobigo is no Churchill.
lookingforitallthetime said:It's still a bargain compared to the costs of the Liberal's lying and deceit. Or did you forget about that?
You don't have to know someone to know if they're well spoken.twobigo said:Why, did you know Churchill.?
regards Lloyd Bentsen
Really? And all this time I thought it was Canadians that made this country so great.peteeey said:What costs? The Liberals made Canada the greatest, most socially conscious country in the world. The Conservatives are well on their way to tear this all apart.
yes, well making a mistake the first time is one thing. But after being directly refuted by the author of the words Baird quoted and took out of context, Baird continues to stand by the claim he made in the house directly refuting Gore's clarification. Mistake or not, it is just stupidity to continue to claim that Gore congratulated the conservatives on their green initiative...someone said:Actually, I suspect that Baird was just reading off briefing notes that were screwed up. I think he is too smart to lie about something that can be so easily falsified. Besides, if he really does have time to actually spend hunting down these quotes himself, I would say that minister’s salaries are too high given the limited demands on their time that would imply! If that is true, there is a good argument to cut his salary to that of a research assistant! That does not mean that he is not responsible for those who brief him. After all, he would have either directly or indirectly (through his chief of staff) be picking those who brief him. However, there is a difference between having poor judgement when it comes to hire competent research assistants and knowingly lying.
for a guy that rarely posts[me]..i,ve really gotten on your nerves for some reason..is your ritalin been back ordered?lookingforitallthetime said:You don't have to know someone to know if they're well spoken.
For example, I don't know you, but I know you're not well spoken.
If you're trying to be clever, you've failed miserably.
I take it back. You really are clever and well spoken.twobigo said:..is your ritalin been back ordered?
I highly doubt that. Canada isn't the best country at anything socially. When you see all the sh!t on the news, I'm not so proud to be Canadian.peteeey said:What costs? The Liberals made Canada the greatest, most socially conscious country in the world.
lookingforitallthetime said:Really? And all this time I thought it was Canadians that made this country so great.
Anyways peteeey, thanks for the laugh. It's always entertaining when the psychotics lend their unique perspective on things.
Keep listening to those voices in your head and keep telling us what they're saying. If this keeps up, I may cancel my cable.
The Churchill comparison was yours. I've read Churchill too but I don't use his proficiency in English as a template against which all others must be judged. I know what I like and I liked that pig wearing a bib analogy. So there!!!!lookingforitallthetime said:Really? You thought that was well said?
Let's face it, twobigo is no Churchill.
No one pissed in my corn flakes slowpoke. I'm quite alright thank you and I'm glad you enjoyed the pig analogy.slowpoke said:The Churchill comparison was yours. I've read Churchill too but I don't use his proficiency in English as a template against which all others must be judged. I know what I like and I liked that pig wearing a bib analogy. So there!!!!
BTW, who pissed in your corn flakes?
I agree that we have to give ministers a bit of latitude since it would be physically impossible for them to double check everything that is done on their behalf. Everyone makes mistakes etc. But once that type of an error is made, I think the minister should retract the statement with an apology which I don't think has happened. Once Gore claimed he'd been misquoted, Baird should have acknowledged his error out of courtesy.someone said:Actually, I suspect that Baird was just reading off briefing notes that were screwed up. I think he is too smart to lie about something that can be so easily falsified. Besides, if he really does have time to actually spend hunting down these quotes himself, I would say that minister’s salaries are too high given the limited demands on their time that would imply! If that is true, there is a good argument to cut his salary to that of a research assistant! That does not mean that he is not responsible for those who brief him. After all, he would have either directly or indirectly (through his chief of staff) be picking those who brief him. However, there is a difference between having poor judgement when it comes to hire competent research assistants and knowingly lying.
I have to agree with you on this one. Admitting a mistake (especial one as minor as a misqoute), is not only a demonstration of good character but a demonstration of good politics as well.slowpoke said:I agree that we have to give ministers a bit of latitude since it would be physically impossible for them to double check everything that is done on their behalf. Everyone makes mistakes etc. But once that type of an error is made, I think the minister should retract the statement with an apology which I don't think has happened. Once Gore claimed he'd been misquoted, Baird should have acknowledged his error out of courtesy.
That's a reasonable expectation. To be honest with you, all I really know about this issue is what I've read here.slowpoke said:Once Gore claimed he'd been misquoted, Baird should have acknowledged his error out of courtesy.