Bill Gates says climate crisis won’t cause ‘humanity’s demise’ in call to shift focus to ‘improving lives’

[Intrinsic]

That's actually a good point, so how about this carbon tax, now what?
Are we going to get our money back? Are they going to remove the tax?

 

[JohnLarue]

Why would you think Bill Gates is a 'climate authority'?

you would prior to his about face

Is he a scientist or climatologist?
Oh right, you think science is done with beer coolers.

too funny,
you think science is determined by vote
too bad for you that you dropped out of high school before learning science is determined by experimental results

and the experimental results do not support your position



please do not embarrass yourself further with your stupid surface vs troposphere argument
1. the greenhouse gas theory predicts the warming will be found in the troposphere
2. the greenhouse gas theory is based on equilibrium

How many years in a row of being wrong about climate change and the warming of the atmosphere will it take before you realize you are wrong?

i am not wrong
verified experimental data is my authority

 

[JohnLarue]

That's actually a good point, so how about this carbon tax, now what?
Are we going to get our money back? Are they going to remove the tax?

you will never get that carbon tax money back
removal of all current carbon taxes will likely require a change in governing party

 

[Intrinsic]

Why would you think Bill Gates is a 'climate authority'?
Is he a scientist or climatologist?
Oh right, you think science is done with beer coolers.

How many years in a row of being wrong about climate change and the warming of the atmosphere will it take before you realize you are wrong?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1984210945749778622

I thought he was a software guy/virologist/Doctor/scientist/climatologist/philanthropist.

 

[Intrinsic]

you will never get that carbon tax money back
removal of all current carbon taxes will likely require a change in governing party

Well ain't that a bitch.

 

[DesRicardo]

That's actually a good point, so how about this carbon tax, now what?
Are we going to get our money back? Are they going to remove the tax?

Sorry bud. The money has already been spent. Party is over. Well, not for all of us I guess.

 

[oil&gas]

That Caravelle yacht is a gas guzzler. The yacht's tank can carry
5,000 liter of fuel. Sailing that yacht while fondling Katy Perry off
the coast of Santa Barbara can consume somewhere between
20 to 30 gallons of gas per hour. The carbon footprint is sickening
considering the carbon polluter is Trudeau the climate warrior.

If the goal of the climate movement is for the filthy rich like Trudeau
and Perry to be absolved from the crime of destroying Earth's climate
that goal will surely be realized.

 

[Frankfooter]

you would prior to his about face

No, I wouldn't.

too funny,
you think science is determined by vote
too bad for you that you dropped out of high school before learning science is determined by experimental results

and the experimental results do not support your position

Nobody backs your theory about IR absorption, larue.
You are just some wacko on the internet here claiming you are smarter then all of science.

View attachment 503939

Bait and switch.
This is a chart that compares surface temperature projections to satellite temperatures in the troposphere.

You post this over and over again despite being called out on it and running away each time.
Its idiotic that you keep posting it.
Do you have dementia?

please do not embarrass yourself further with your stupid surface vs troposphere argument
1. the greenhouse gas theory predicts the warming will be found in the troposphere
2. the greenhouse gas theory is based on equilibrium

The IPCC also predicts ocean temps will rise, why don't you post those against surface temps?
Its just as stupid and dishonest.

i am not wrong
verified experimental data is my authority

Bullshit.

You post the same chart despite it being bait and switch
Surface temperature projections should be judged against surface temperature measurements.
Not the temperature in the clouds.

 

[Frankfooter]

taxing people for something that isn't a priority...yeah nice try....you got played hard, and still eating it...
-Joe Biden is cognitive
-Kamala is better than Trump
-World is ending because of climate change
-Hamas isn't the problem
just a few on the list that proves how detached you are from reality....how's the weather in lalaland?

I expect you couldn't pass this test either

 

[Frankfooter]

A reminder that Bill Gates built himself a bunker.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1984436133791682966

 

[JohnLarue]

No, I wouldn't.

you certainly would

??
you have not figured out your word is not worth anything?

Nobody backs your theory about IR absorption, larue.

its not my theory
it is fundamental laws of physical nature , proven via experiment and successful product development.... co2 lasers were developed and work

but, you the high school drop out says its all wrong....... because .......why. again.........?......?

You are just some wacko on the internet here claiming you are smarter then all of science.

i have never made that claim
and now we have you the high school drop out defining .....''all of science''

you are a cartoon

Bait and switch.
This is a chart that compares surface temperature projections to satellite temperatures in the troposphere.

wrong
it compares failed models to verified atmospheric temperature changes
twice verified

please do not embarrass yourself further with your stupid surface vs troposphere argument
1. the greenhouse gas theory predicts the warming will be found in the troposphere
2. the greenhouse gas theory is based on equilibrium[

You post this over and over again despite being called out on it and running away each time.
Its idiotic that you keep posting it.
Do you have dementia?

please do not embarrass yourself further with your stupid surface vs troposphere argument
1. the greenhouse gas theory predicts the warming will be found in the troposphere
2. the greenhouse gas theory is based on equilibrium

The IPCC also predicts ocean temps will rise, why don't you post those against surface temps?
Its just as stupid and dishonest.

oceans are 2/3 of the planets surface
the ocean temperature record sets coverage is minuscule relative to the surface area and depth
besides the satellite data is complete coverage and its verified against two independent weather balloon data sets, so we know the satellite data to be accurate

The IPCC also predicts ocean temps will rise

which is based on the failed climate models



please do not embarrass yourself further with your stupid surface vs troposphere argument
1. the greenhouse gas theory predicts the warming will be found in the troposphere
2. the greenhouse gas theory is based on equilibrium

Bullshit.

You post the same chart despite it being bait and switch
Surface temperature projections should be judged against surface temperature measurements.
Not the temperature in the clouds.

please do not embarrass yourself further with your stupid surface vs troposphere argument
1. the greenhouse gas theory predicts the warming will be found in the troposphere
2. the greenhouse gas theory is based on equilibrium

you best look up what equilibrium means in the context of heat exchange and then apply some rate of change logic


all your nonsense is based on failed models

models which can not replicate the past - a bare minimum for any predictive model
models which can not model cloud formation or turbulence
models which require human (activists) estimations as inputs

 

[Frankfooter]

you certainly would
??
you have not figured out your word is not worth anything?
its not my theory
it is fundamental laws of physical nature , proven via experiment and successful product development.... co2 lasers were developed and work
but, you the high school drop out says its all wrong....... because .......why. again.........?......?
i have never made that claim
and now we have you the high school drop out defining .....''all of science''
you are a cartoon
wrong
it compares failed models to verified atmospheric temperature changes
twice verified
please do not embarrass yourself further with your stupid surface vs troposphere argument
1. the greenhouse gas theory predicts the warming will be found in the troposphere
2. the greenhouse gas theory is based on equilibrium[
please do not embarrass yourself further with your stupid surface vs troposphere argument
1. the greenhouse gas theory predicts the warming will be found in the troposphere
2. the greenhouse gas theory is based on equilibrium
oceans are 2/3 of the planets surface
the ocean temperature record sets coverage is minuscule relative to the surface area and depth
besides the satellite data is complete coverage and its verified against two independent weather balloon data sets, so we know the satellite data to be accurate
which is based on the failed climate models
please do not embarrass yourself further with your stupid surface vs troposphere argument
1. the greenhouse gas theory predicts the warming will be found in the troposphere
2. the greenhouse gas theory is based on equilibrium
please do not embarrass yourself further with your stupid surface vs troposphere argument
1. the greenhouse gas theory predicts the warming will be found in the troposphere
2. the greenhouse gas theory is based on equilibrium
you best look up what equilibrium means in the context of heat exchange and then apply some rate of change logic
all your nonsense is based on failed models
models which can not replicate the past - a bare minimum for any predictive model
models which can not model cloud formation or turbulence
models which require human (activists) estimations as inputs

This is the incoherent ramblings of some old fool who thinks he's got a theory that nobody at the IPCC could ever understand.

If you were right, larue, there would be no warming.
But there has been warming every year.
Every single year you've been wrong but won't admit it.
Every single metric shows you are wrong, temp, CO2, forest fires, hurricane strength, extreme storms, glacial melt, ocean temps.....

You are the Dunning Kruger champion of terb

https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/advance-article/doi/10.1093/biosci/biaf149/8303627?login=false

 

[JohnLarue]

This is the incoherent ramblings of some old fool who thinks he's got a theory that nobody at the IPCC could ever understand.

it is clearly a theory that high school drop outs cant understand

If you were right, larue, there would be no warming.
But there has been warming every year.

multiple ice ages defines the fact our planets climates warms and cool naturally
we are still emerging from an ice age

Every single year you've been wrong but won't admit it.
Every single metric shows you are wrong, temp, CO2, forest fires, hurricane strength, extreme storms, glacial melt, ocean temps....

.

you mean every single piece of climate alarmist propaganda has turned out to completely wrong or grossly exaggerated

Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions - Competitive Enterprise Institute

Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s. They continue to do so today. None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true. What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in government and...

cei.org

Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions

You are the Dunning Kruger champion of terb

go sit in the corner with your dunce cap on

 

[tml]

Wonder if this book authored by Bill Gates will undergo
a major revision.

Yes it will, and it will be re-titled "Just Kidding".

 

[Frankfooter]

it is clearly a theory that high school drop outs cant understand

Its a theory that fits in the Confederacy of Dunces.
A theory that nobody but mr science himself, johnnylarue, can understand,.

multiple ice ages defines the fact our planets climates warms and cool naturally
we are still emerging from an ice age

In other words, you have no clue and think that its totally natural that CO2 and temp are rising at the same time.

.

you mean every single piece of climate alarmist propaganda has turned out to completely wrong or grossly exaggerated

IPCC projections are conservative, if anything, compared to what we see now,
We hit 1.5ºC.

go sit in the corner with your dunce cap on

I'll sit with the thousands of scientists at the IPCC, NASA and AAAS who think your ideas are idiotic.

View attachment 504907

1) Stop comparing surface temperature projections to the temperature in the clouds
2) Stop using an old dataset that ends in 2017 when you know why Christy won't update it.

 

[richaceg]

Its a theory that fits in the Confederacy of Dunces.
A theory that nobody but mr science himself, johnnylarue, can understand,.



In other words, you have no clue and think that its totally natural that CO2 and temp are rising at the same time.

.



IPCC projections are conservative, if anything, compared to what we see now,
We hit 1.5ºC.





I'll sit with the thousands of scientists at the IPCC, NASA and AAAS who think your ideas are idiotic.





1) Stop comparing surface temperature projections to the temperature in the clouds
2) Stop using an old dataset that ends in 2017 when you know why Christy won't update it.

Franky the guy who thinks tweets from guys he aligns himself with are the facts...LMAO...not only has he dug he's heels on the most extreme left agenda, looks like he's waist deep....

 

[Frankfooter]

Franky the guy who thinks tweets from guys he aligns himself with are the facts...LMAO...not only has he dug he's heels on the most extreme left agenda, looks like he's waist deep....

Oh great, another subject where you are clueless but desperate to troll.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1985177677876339133

 

[JohnLarue]

1) Stop comparing surface temperature projections to the temperature in the clouds
2) Stop using an old dataset that ends in 2017 when you know why Christy won't update it.

hmm
i smell a lair

odd how your fabricated lie pokes well above 1 C in 2024

meanwhile Roy spencer's latest real graphic never goes above 1 c in 2024 and cools off by 0.4 C in 2025
below 2020, 2016 and 1998


anyone is free to observe the real graphic & witness first hand Frank footers foolish, childish and intentional deception

Latest Global Temps « Roy Spencer, PhD

Frankfooter, you are completely untrustworthy and a fool


meanwhile what had the models predicted for 2025?

well its off the chart , catastrophic propaganda 3 to 4x times the actual
the climate models are expensive, intentionally misleading, junk

 

[Frankfooter]

hmm
i smell a lair

Have been spending too much time in the basement again?

odd how your fabricated lie pokes well above 1 C in 2024

meanwhile Roy spencer's latest real graphic never goes above 1 c in 2024 and cools off by 0.4 C in 2025
below 2020, 2016 and 1998

Your chart shows around 1ºC warming in the troposphere, or in the clouds.
That shows that warming is also happening in the troposphere, along with on the surface.
Which kills your argument.
No wonder you keep posting that stops using data past 2016.

You are either incredibly dishonest or incredibly stupid.
Though I suspect its both.

View attachment 505380
anyone is free to observe the real graphic & witness first hand Frank footers foolish, childish and intentional deception

Latest Global Temps « Roy Spencer, PhD

Frankfooter, you are completely untrustworthy and a fool

You posted the same chart then called me dishonest for posting the same one you posted.
nice work.

meanwhile what had the models predicted for 2025?

What, you gonna argue that this time maybe the planet won't keep warming?
Even though you've been wrong about this every year of your life?

Your pet theory is about IR absorption, larue.
Here's the latest, the result of 1.5ºC warming means that the atmosphere holds more moisture.
That means more extreme storms like the hurricane in Jamaica, which was big enough to be a category 6.

As a result, IR absorption is declining and the planet is warming even faster.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1864770322936799293

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1985310318323728392

 

[JohnLarue]

Your chart shows around 1ºC of temperature in the troposphere, or in the clouds.
That shows that warming is also happening in the troposphere, along with on the surface.
Which kills your argument.
No wonder you keep posting that stops using data past 2016.

NO

your altered chart shows over 1.0 degree of warming, in 2024

while the real chart from Roy spencer's chart shows the temperature anomaly never exceeds 1.0 C

anyone is free to observe the real graphic & witness first hand Frank footers foolish, childish and intentional deception
Latest Global Temps « Roy Spencer, PhD


YOU intentionally posted a FRAUDELENT mis-representation of Roy Spencer's data


the facts do not lie
frankfooter lies all the time

You are either incredibly dishonest or incredibly stupid.
Though I suspect its both.

you are both incredibly dishonest and incredibly stupid

You posted the same chart then called me dishonest for posting the same one you posted.
nice work.

they are NOT the same. your fraudulent chart exceeds 1 C, Roy Spencer's does not
busted