Who the fuck are you kidding.....you wouldn't know a fact if it hit you in head. Now run along and go beat off to your Mikey Moore collection.Just stating the FACTS....something you never cared for!....![]()
Who the fuck are you kidding.....you wouldn't know a fact if it hit you in head. Now run along and go beat off to your Mikey Moore collection.Just stating the FACTS....something you never cared for!....![]()
His plan has been vetted by many economists and business people, don't know where you get your assertions from. More left wing lunacy I assume.He came up with his plan on his own, without running it by any professional economists, and his only consultant on this was a financial advisor from Cleveland, who only has a degree in accounting. No, really. Hey, that's in your neighborhood. Maybe you know the guy.
Yep, it scews the poor people.His plan has been vetted by many economists and business people, don't know where you get your assertions from. More left wing lunacy I assume.
How come you never want to see job creation?Yep, it scews the poor people.
Actually, both he and his campaign have bragged the the plan has not been vetted by many economists and business people. You seem to have this backwards.His plan has been vetted by many economists and business people, don't know where you get your assertions from. More left wing lunacy I assume.
Why on gods green earth would a massive consumption tax create more jobs?How come you never want to see job creation?
Might better and more jobs do more for Americans than your plan????
Why on gods green earth would a massive consumption tax create more jobs?
OK, now I see. Besides shifting taxation from the rich to the poor, the purpose of the plan is also to reduce theWOW
and yet when the dems want to raise taxes to create more programs; this is a good thing?
YOU simply can not tax your way to prosperity.
The Government creates no jobs at all that do not depend on confiscated money.
Only the private sector can create jobs and increase the tax base.
What is wrong with a level playing field?
If you make 10,000 dollars per year you pay 900 dollars per year in tax.
So if you make 100,000 or ten times more you pay ten times more.
People will invest more into business when this country stops waffling on the economy.
I know you doOK, now I see. Besides shifting taxation from the rich to the poor, the purpose of the plan is also to reduce the
overall tax revenue.
That is a brilliant idea, when the country is going bancrupt. Does Cain have any greek ancestors?
There are three fundamental problems with your approach.WOW
and yet when the dems want to raise taxes to create more programs; this is a good thing?
YOU simply can not tax your way to prosperity.
The Government creates no jobs at all that do not depend on confiscated money.
Only the private sector can create jobs and increase the tax base.
What is wrong with a level playing field?
If you make 10,000 dollars per year you pay 900 dollars per year in tax.
So if you make 100,000 or ten times more you pay ten times more.
People will invest more into business when this country stops waffling on the economy.
That's right. Reduce the tax on the rich, raise the overall tax burden on the working class along with the necessary cuts in what government can provide and things will be just right.Country is going bancrupt, Brilliant soution: reduce taxation.
It must be nice to be king.That's right. Reduce the tax on the rich, raise the overall tax burden on the working class along with the necessary cuts in what government can provide and things will be just right.
I think you missed 27leaffan's sarcasm--I'm pretty sure he agrees with you.It must be nice to be king.
This solution would only make the current problem of massive upwards wealth distribution, worse.
Most GOPers have lots of Greek in them.That is a brilliant idea, when the country is going bancrupt. Does Cain have any greek ancestors?
What is the funding source of Government jobs??There are three fundamental problems with your approach.
Firstly you have this assumption that only the private sector can create jobs. Firstly, this is factually not true. Secondly the private sector can create jobs with public money, it is a tried and true formula.
Secondly, the current economic crisis evolved in a very low tax environment. thus once again proving that low taxes does not seem to create jobs.
Thirdly, and most importantly, you clearly do not understand Mr. Cain's tax plan proposals, and are stuck in its initial step. The Cain plan does not stop at 9-9-9, it proposes the elimination of income taxes for individuals and corparations to be replaced with a national sales tax of about 23%. I am sure I don't have to explain to you how both regressive and job killing that has the potential to be.
I think there are plenty of flaws in the 9-9-9 as well, which your example sets out. I would suggest to you that if you make $10,000 a year losing $900 would be crippling. While if you make a million...and so on.
As one astute commentator put it, this plan is only a good idea if you believe that the poor and middle class are currently under taxed and you think that the very rich are over taxed. The rate at which these groups are accumulating wealth would seem to tell us otherwise.
NO SHIT SHERLOCK! That doesn't make it wrong though.What is the funding source of Government jobs??
How much do you contribute to this??
BTW I disagree with using public money to create jobs
Then why weren't you bellyaching when Dubya & his DICK did it in Iraq???....BTW I disagree with using public money to create jobs
Then why weren't you bellyaching when Dubya & his DICK did it in Iraq???....![]()
What economsts? The link is to an article by Bruce Bartlett who held senoir policy positions in the Reagan and H. W. Bush administrations and his take on Cain's plan. Try and take the tine to read it, it's not that hard to understand.His plan has been vetted by many economists and business people, don't know where you get your assertions from. More left wing lunacy I assume.
As my experience has been that hardly anybody here reads more than 2 lines of any article orWhat economsts? The link is to an article by Bruce Bartlett who held senoir policy positions in the Reagan and H. W. Bush administrations and his take on Cain's plan. Try and take the tine to read it, it's not that hard to understand.
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/11/inside-the-cain-tax-plan/