2015: just wait and see.
2019: just wait and see.
2021: just wait and see.
2025: ……..I’m starting to see a pattern.
Canada elections results 2025
- Thread starter canada-man
- Start date
2019: just wait and see.
2021: just wait and see.
2025: ……..I’m starting to see a pattern.
The majority of the electorate saw a pattern they liked and stuck with the Libs and flushed Pee Pee down the toilet along with his toilet seat.
Sorry but dem da facts Mr. Desi, deal with it.
I disagree. It was more a block vote and even with that, conservatives stilled gained seats which blocked a majority.
with that said the election is over.
Well, you might as well list your grievances and the liberal failures for the next 4 years right now.
You've made up your mind, just get it over and done with so we can move on to what really is happening.
C'mon, Desi, you are just very upset and disappointed. Dougy can be reached by phone. I suggest you call him and ask him why he supported Carney and tanked Pee Pee's campaign. Ford can be such a troll like the rest of us who support Libs and Carney voters.
Last edited:
Don’t need to call. I already know it’s all about money.
I guess it’s ok for Ford to get paid off as long as it from a liberal.
Ahhhh, so Desi logic is Carney paid off Ford and Pee Pee just didn't offer enough $$$$$ to Ford??
Does this mean in the next Provincial election in about 3 years you will be voting Liberal to punish Dougy??
The best thing that could ever happen for the Federal neocons is if Ford ran as their leader.
Liberals waste money. Why would I vote for that?
You’re not making any sense. I suggest you go back to posting lame memes.
You posted this did you not? You accused Ford of taking money from the Libs to go against Pee Pee correct???
Then you post this claiming I'm not making any sense?????
Dude, c; mon man.
Question, if you lived in the US would you be voting Democrats (libs) or Republicans (conservatives) in Nov. 2024?
And this is what’s wrong with liberals. You have no position other than being the opposite to conservatives.
you still haven’t said anything about policy and what you want from Carney going forward. You’re whole purpose is to be anti-conservative.
The AI comparison below says it all—and frankly, it’s all you really need to understand why I’m backing Carney over a walking piss stain.
As I’ve mentioned in another post: if the Conservatives had chosen Jean Charest, my vote might’ve been up for grabs. It would’ve depended on his platform, of course—but here’s the key difference: Charest commands respect. I wouldn’t be out here bad-mouthing or name-calling him, because he’s a serious adult with a track record of actual governance.
But instead? The Conservatives rolled out a Convoy-cheerleading, arrogant, Trump-lite twat and expect the rest of us to applaud. No thanks. That’s not leadership—it’s cosplay for angry Facebook uncles.
Education & Credentials:
Mark Carney:
- BA in Economics (Harvard University)
- MPhil & DPhil in Economics (Oxford University)
- Rhodes Scholar
- Former Governor of both the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England
- UN Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance
Pierre Poilievre:
- BA in International Relations (University of Calgary)
- Lifelong political operator; elected MP at 25
- No formal economics or finance credentials beyond political office
Edge: Carney, by a landslide in academic and financial leadership.
Professional Experience:Mark Carney:
- Managed two of the world’s most powerful central banks
- Guided Canada through the 2008 financial crisis with international acclaim
- Deep experience in global finance, climate economics, and monetary policy
Pierre Poilievre:
- Longtime politician; served in Harper government as Minister for Democratic Reform and later Employment and Social Development
- Known for aggressive opposition style and populist messaging
- Recently branded himself as a crypto and “sound money” advocate
Edge: Carney, for global leadership and real-world crisis management.
Leadership & Public Presence:Carney:
- Technocratic, measured, policy-driven
- Seen as calm, intelligent, but sometimes distant or overly elite
Poilievre:
- Charismatic to his base, populist firebrand
- Skilled communicator, especially on social media
- Appeals to economic anxieties, often oversimplifies complex issues
Edge: Poilievre, in raw political communication—but Carney wins on substance.
Ideological Approach:Carney:
- Centrist-Liberal, evidence-based, globally minded, climate-focused
- Big-picture, technocratic lens
Poilievre:
- Small-government libertarian populist
- Anti-central bank, anti-carbon tax, pro-crypto, “freedom” branding
It’s a clash of worlds: global economist vs domestic populist.
Summary:If you're hiring someone to run a G7 economy, manage crises, or guide long-term policy with global complexity—Carney is the heavyweight.
If you're choosing someone to stoke frustration, meme on social media, and rally a political base—Poilievre’s your guy.
Oh look the Liberals are involved with the controversial spa
Adam Vaughan hired by Ontario Place spa developer Therme
Therme Canada's concept for the redesigned Ontario Place includes the construction of a state-of-the-art wellness facility.
toronto.citynews.ca
you are 100% correct
their whole purpose is to be anti-conservative.
the ironic thing is without conservative fiscal responsibility, the current liberals are going to drive government into insolvency via irresponsible spending and irresponsible debt
and that will result in the end of their cherished social safety net
my guess is they plan on blaming the conservatives when the shit hits the fan
Desi, you really just can't help yourself, can you? You're out there lost in the political wilderness, face down in the three-foot grass, pounding your fists and feet like a toddler denied dessert. But hey—chin up—you can always try again in three or four years.
Now, here’s a real question:
How exactly are the Conservatives going to handle someone like Mark Carney—a calm, credible, internationally respected adult—when he’s at the helm?
Are they going to keep spouting their tired little slogans in Parliament once Pee Pee finally wins a seat and shuffles back in?
And speaking of that seat: since he’s running in a guaranteed riding in Alberta, let’s take it a step further—if Alberta ever seriously voted to leave Canada, how does Poilievre spin being the MP for what would effectively be a secessionist, traitor riding?
Awkward, no?
