actually "spoken like somebody that doesn't think objectively to any significance"
a common occurrence in ideologues
Canada Post on Strike
- Thread starter jeff2
- Start date
a common occurrence in ideologues
Like the way you run away from the climate change threads after you are challenged to defend your claims?
I don't what you think is your fair share is. Talk to me when more that 50% of your marginal income. Until then I will regard as a free-loader you sound like.
Talk to me when you are actually paying that full tax rate and not using deductions and accounting to keep it around what the middle and lower class pay.
What would be even more interesting to know is what does the top 5% earn in income and pay in taxes. I would bet that they pay more than double their income share. Yet ignoramouses like Frankie say tax them more. Easy to say when you're not paying the piper. So the top 20% of family earners in Ontario make $261,620. Depending upon where you live and the size of the family, that could be well off or that could be upper middle income. If one earner makes $175K and the other $86.5K they retain 69.8% of their income after income taxes, CPP and EI. $182,490. Or $15,208 per month. A family of 5 living in Toronto could see 1/3 of that sucked up in housing costs - mortgage, utilities, property taxes, insurance and maintenance. Which would leave $10K per month for groceries, car payments, cell phones, internet, cable, travel, clothing, kids activities and savings. Not exactly rich.
That's the Fraser Institute talking point, its an intentional attempt to reframe the argument from the 1% top earners to the 20% in order to gain sympathy.
Keep this discussion to the 1%.
That's your talking point, and its an intentional attempt to reframe the argument from the 20% top earners to the 1% in order to promote uneducated outrage
the discussion goes where it goes
nobody in their right mind will let you dictate limits on their free speech to them
Sure, if you want to keep talking about the wrong points, nobody can stop you.
As we've seen here for years.
More than you think. They are the leading interceptor of illicit goods (drugs, guns, counterfeit cash, etc) both from border crossings and in cross-provincial shipping. Not only that, but because there's post being delivered literally everywhere in the country without it the RCMP would have a drastically harder time tracking where these goods (and their intended criminal element) end up.
So it doesn't go through a boarder Security? I don't think Canada Post handles the security of international shipping. Maybe cross province but not coming into Canada.
My guess, you are the one who is going to decide what is "fair share"
Customs and Border Patrol screens yes, but CP is the one that loads and ships and each distro center and handoff is a touch point that can result in illegal content discovery. That's not the point tho. I was just saying that in fact there's another intrinsic benefit to having our own publicly-owned postal service.
The demonization of Canada Post, and esp it's workers, is purposeful. When they are painted as useless and greedy it makes us ok with it's dissolution of service so it can eventually be privatized. That's the end goal of people that tell you you shouldn't fight for more: To accept less so they can take more for themselves.
they do not have 10 years
10 months maybe
i do not think you have a clue what is going to happen to our country
Oh, great Guru Larue gaze into your crusty balls and tell us the future.....................otherwise I will have to wait 10 months and see if Canada Post is still around.
Last edited:
i already told you
they do not have 10 years
10 months maybe
i do not think you have a clue what is going to happen to our country
