Carney skipping Quebec French Debate

[CLOUD 500]

PeePee won't get clearance because his leadership campaign relied on Indian money.
IDU.

Singh read the report, he has clearance.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904689602092277829

You are posting misinformation. I would not consider Twitter a reliable source of information. And someone quoted an article from the Globe and Mail, not sure if it was you about what Indians propping up Poilievre when the article clearly said "alleged". They were spreading misinformation in the hopes that people like you would believe it. Their agenda was to slander Poilievre because he was exposing the Century Initiative and the Globe and Mail was aligned with that lobby group.

https://www.montrealgazette.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/article862523.html

Carney targeted by Chinese WeChat ‘operation’ in Canada election: officials - National | Globalnews.ca

The 'information operation' was launched by Youli-Youmian, WeChat's most popular news account, which has been linked to the Chinese Communist Party, Canadian officials said.

globalnews.ca

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/carney-wechat-china-1.7503711

Officials Report Beijing-Linked Online Operation Targeting Carney

In Ottawa, officials from the government’s Security and Intelligence Threats to Elections (SITE) Task Force hold a technical briefing on the upcoming federal election. They report that they have uncovered an online information operation linked to the Chinese government that is focused on Liberal...

www.cpac.ca

Chinese government boosted Carney posts on popular social media platform

Canada’s electoral inference watchdog says the Chinese government is behind recent campaigns to influence views of Mark Carney.

nationalpost.com

^^^^ What I find interesting is how you are quiet about this. There is a campaign by the Chinese Communist government targeting Carney. Looks like the CCP is boosting Carney. Looks like election interference. If I were you I would be very concerned with this. This is btw not alleged.

 

[wigglee]

it is not a stupid argument.
The IPCC has concluded that a signal of climate change has not yet emerged beyond natural variability for the following phenomena:

• River floods
• Heavy precipitation and pluvial floods
• Landslides
• Drought (all types)
• Severe wind storms
• Tropical cyclones
• Sand and dust storms
• Heavy snowfall and ice storms
• Hail
• Snow avalanche
• Coastal flooding
• Marine heat waves

there is a difference between science and propaganda

you would not know the scientific method if it ran you over,
you are a high school drop out

the Inuit are propagandists? LOL
Next you'll tell us the LA fires were set by Democrats.

 

[JohnLarue]

the Inuit are propagandists? LOL
Next you'll tell us the LA fires were set by Democrats.

????
WTF
who mentioned the Inuit??

The LA fires might have been easier to fight with water
Did the democrats let the reservoirs run dry?


back to the point

wigglee said:

what is the cost of extreme weather events?

extreme weather events are part of natural variability

The IPCC has concluded that a signal of climate change has not yet emerged beyond natural variability for the following phenomena:

• River floods
• Heavy precipitation and pluvial floods
• Landslides
• Drought (all types)
• Severe wind storms
• Tropical cyclones
• Sand and dust storms
• Heavy snowfall and ice storms
• Hail
• Snow avalanche
• Coastal flooding
• Marine heat waves

 

[JohnLarue]

Are you claiming they made no projections with 'high confidence'?
Why won't you list them?

Why won't you list them ? you blithering fool
be sure to quote the IPCC report, not your propaganda sources

you should be far more concerned with the difference between what the science says and the propaganda


extreme weather events are part of natural variability

The IPCC has concluded that a signal of climate change has not yet emerged beyond natural variability for the following phenomena:

• River floods
• Heavy precipitation and pluvial floods
• Landslides
• Drought (all types)
• Severe wind storms
• Tropical cyclones
• Sand and dust storms
• Heavy snowfall and ice storms
• Hail
• Snow avalanche
• Coastal flooding
• Marine heat waves

 

[JohnLarue]

You want the IPCC to be able to predict exactly how many more landslides there will be and if they can't then you think they are useless?
That's idiotic.

When you boil a pot of water you can accurately predict when it will boil, you will not be able to accurately predict where the first bubble will be.
What we care about is that adding CO2 and greenhouse gases is increasing the global temperature and the amount of chaos into the climate.

Remember the time you said that if climate change is happening it would be the greatest crime against humanity?
We are now committed to 3ºC warming with 4ºC likely by the end of the century, which will doom most of humanity.
Congrats on being complicit.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1909308182356213998

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678783298171031554

pure bullshit propaganda spewed by a fool

 

[JohnLarue]

We could all use Johnny's pearls of wisdom.

you could use some incremental wisdom rather than just playing the fool / clown all the time

 

[Insidious Von]

you could use some incremental wisdom rather than just playing the fool / clown all the time

I have wisdom to spare my good friend, when Warren Buffet converted into cash, I did the same. Trump is an even bigger imbecile than James Cayne. I did the same in 2007 when JP Morgan - Chase took control of Bear Stearns. Johnny will you be taking part in the Pepi Longsocks revival?

 

[Insidious Von]

....I'm getting my popcorn ready.

 

[JohnLarue]

I have wisdom to spare my good friend, when Warren Buffet converted into cash, I did the same. Trump is an even bigger imbecile than James Cayne. I did the same in 2007 when JP Morgan - Chase took control of Bear Stearns. Johnny will you be taking part in the Pepi Longsocks revival?

good for you
what does following Warren Buffet market timing moves have to with carney-skipping-quebec-french-debate or the climate change propaganda ?

i have been clear on Trump
He is mean spirited , vindictive and nasty. I would have prefer he had not run again
It was a shame the democrats could not have offered up a better alternative
It was a shame the democrats could not have recognized they had drifted too far to the left
for every action there is a reaction

FYI
I do not try to time the market, rather just invest in solid dividend paying companies, while keeping a eye on the asset allocations

 

[MaverickPunter]

 

[Frankfooter]

You are posting misinformation. I would not consider Twitter a reliable source of information. And someone quoted an article from the Globe and Mail, not sure if it was you about what Indians propping up Poilievre when the article clearly said "alleged". They were spreading misinformation in the hopes that people like you would believe it. Their agenda was to slander Poilievre because he was exposing the Century Initiative and the Globe and Mail was aligned with that lobby group.

https://www.montrealgazette.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/article862523.html

Carney targeted by Chinese WeChat ‘operation’ in Canada election: officials - National | Globalnews.ca

The 'information operation' was launched by Youli-Youmian, WeChat's most popular news account, which has been linked to the Chinese Communist Party, Canadian officials said.

globalnews.ca

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/carney-wechat-china-1.7503711

Officials Report Beijing-Linked Online Operation Targeting Carney

In Ottawa, officials from the government’s Security and Intelligence Threats to Elections (SITE) Task Force hold a technical briefing on the upcoming federal election. They report that they have uncovered an online information operation linked to the Chinese government that is focused on Liberal...

www.cpac.ca

Chinese government boosted Carney posts on popular social media platform

Canada’s electoral inference watchdog says the Chinese government is behind recent campaigns to influence views of Mark Carney.

nationalpost.com

^^^^ What I find interesting is how you are quiet about this. There is a campaign by the Chinese Communist government targeting Carney. Looks like the CCP is boosting Carney. Looks like election interference. If I were you I would be very concerned with this. This is btw not alleged.

Posts on Wechat?
Where some are positive and some are negative?

 

[Frankfooter]

Why won't you list them ? you blithering fool
be sure to quote the IPCC report, not your propaganda sources

you should be far more concerned with the difference between what the science says and the propaganda


extreme weather events are part of natural variability

Ah, thought so.
You've never read the reports so read an oil$gas funded disinformation piece and believed it fully without checking it.

Read the report and tell me what it says that is propaganda.
(this is just the summary for policy makers, since I know you won't or can't read the full reports)

https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_SPM.pdf

Then tell me why you don't think hitting any of 1.5ºC, 2ºC or 4ºC will impact the planet because the IPCC can't predict how many more landslides there will be.

 

[Frankfooter]

pure bullshit propaganda spewed by a fool

You won't even look at global temperatures and CO2 levels anymore, your head is so deep in the sand.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1909893722331824324

 

[GameBoy27]

You won't even look at global temperatures and CO2 levels anymore, your head is so deep in the sand.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1909893722331824324

Well if that's the case, then Carney's a complete idiot for eliminating the consumer carbon price. For the past 10 years, the Liberals and Carney have been preaching the virtues of carbon taxes and how they're absolutely essential to reduce global warming. In fact, Carney's on record saying current taxes aren't high enough.

But now that he's PM, consumer carbon taxes are bad? How can you believe anything this guy says?

The debates will be fun to watch.

 

[Frankfooter]

Well if that's the case, then Carney's a complete idiot for eliminating the consumer carbon price. For the past 10 years, the Liberals and Carney have been preaching the virtues of carbon taxes and how they're absolutely essential to reduce global warming. In fact, Carney's on record saying current taxes aren't high enough.

But now that he's PM, consumer carbon taxes are bad? How can you believe anything this guy says?

The debates will be fun to watch.

The carbon tax was killed by foreign disinformation.

The carbon tax was good, but even better were the subsidies for heat pumps.
That and renewables is all we need to do here, though renewables are so cheap they are now the choice unless you're a MAGA moron.

 

[bver_hunter]

I think many Canadians don't know the whole story and reason why Poilievre won't get the security clearance. Do you not agree with Tom Mulcair's take on the matter? If so, why do you think Mulcair is wrong?

Mulcair is the only one who supports Pee Pee's stance on it. He is no longer an NDP supporter as on Power Play he has always spoken in favour of the Conservatives.
But why has Jagmeet Singh and the rest of the candidates for the PM had their security clearances?
But can you explain this stance of Poilievre when asked about the donations here:

Poilievre calls journalist 'a protester' while they try to ask him a question

A journalist shouted a question at Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre during a campaign stop in Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., on Wednesday. The journalist was not on the list of people allotted a question, which the Conservative Party limits to four per day. Poilievre had been asked previously by another reporter about donations the Conservatives received from groups associated with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's political party.

https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/9.6717169

 

[GameBoy27]

Mulcair is the only one who supports Pee Pee's stance on it. He is no longer an NDP supporter as on Power Play he has always spoken in favour of the Conservatives.
But why has Jagmeet Singh and the rest of the candidates for the PM had their security clearances?
But can you explain this stance of Poilievre when asked about the donations here:

Poilievre calls journalist 'a protester' while they try to ask him a question

A journalist shouted a question at Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre during a campaign stop in Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., on Wednesday. The journalist was not on the list of people allotted a question, which the Conservative Party limits to four per day. Poilievre had been asked previously by another reporter about donations the Conservatives received from groups associated with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's political party.

https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/9.6717169

Wow, that's a major scandal. I bet Poilievre steps down.

 

[The Oracle]

Wow, that's a major scandal. I bet Poilievre steps down.

I watched it and thought it was funny the way he just blew her off.

The stop in Brampton came off well tonight as well...You can tell he's getting more comfortable in front of crowds.

He still looks forced most of the time though. His wife did a good job. I'd use her more often. She'll have an appeal to the new immigrants. He should play to the families of Canada.

 

[Frankfooter]

I watched it and thought it was funny the way he just blew her off.

The stop in Brampton came off well tonight as well...You can tell he's getting more comfortable in front of crowds.

He still looks forced most of the time though. His wife did a good job. I'd use her more often. She'll have an appeal to the new immigrants. He should play to the families of Canada.

Sure, PeePee trolling journalist will play well to MAGA and the incel crowd.
It just won't win him mainstream support.

Keep it up.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1909420360790847662

 

[CLOUD 500]

Well if that's the case, then Carney's a complete idiot for eliminating the consumer carbon price. For the past 10 years, the Liberals and Carney have been preaching the virtues of carbon taxes and how they're absolutely essential to reduce global warming. In fact, Carney's on record saying current taxes aren't high enough.

But now that he's PM, consumer carbon taxes are bad? How can you believe anything this guy says?

The debates will be fun to watch.

He is doing this to get votes and he is sneaky. While he removed the consumer carbon tax, the industrial carbon tax still remains. So customers will pay for it. This is coming from a guy when he was chairman of Brookefield, dodged hundreds of millions of dollars of taxes in offshore accounts in Bermuda. When questioned about if he would close tax loopholes, he answered in circles and said he follows the rules. It is in the debates that Carney will go down, Canadians cannot be that naive to vote for another four years of Liberals.