Yeah people tend to not like trolling and vitriol and those are the exact reasons why you'd report someone on an online forum.
Charlie Kirk Shot in the Neck in Utah (Update: Shooter Alt-right links)
- Thread starter lir2016
- Start date
"Christian nationalism" is just the latest buzzword for white nationalism.
I agree, your constant complaining about reporting, is weak.
Right wingers are still by far the more violent.
Right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and more deadly
Right-wing violence accounts for 75%+ of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001.
www.salon.com
Last edited:
A number of Democrats joined with Republicans for a resolution that honored the life of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk, following his assassination at a political event at Utah Valley University last week. But very few of them came from the Congressional Black Caucus.
According to Politico, the Black Caucus put out a statement that "denounced political violence and the killing of Kirk, but said individuals must condemn violence 'without abandoning our right to speak out against ideas that are inconsistent with our values as Americans.'"
The caucus further stated that Kirk held “racist, harmful, and fundamentally un-American” beliefs that would be inappropriately be dignified by supporting the resolution.
Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA and a key contributor to President Donald Trump's voter canvassing operation last year, has a long history of inflammatory and controversial statements on race.
Among many other things, he said passing the 1964 Civil Rights Act that guaranteed Black people a right to integrated public accommodation was a "mistake," repeatedly attacked Dr. Martin Luther King, has said that "prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people" in cities, said he believes airlines are endangering passengers with unqualified Black pilots hired to meet quotas, and paid tribute to a pastor who claimed slavery was a godly institution.
The killing of Kirk triggered a political firestorm around the country, and though both Democrats and Republicans alike were quick to condemn the crime, far-right voices all around the media began blaming the left before the manhunt for the killer had even concluded.
'Not about healing': Black Caucus hits out at Charlie Kirk honor
According to Politico, the Black Caucus put out a statement that "denounced political violence and the killing of Kirk, but said individuals must condemn violence 'without abandoning our right to speak out against ideas that are inconsistent with our values as Americans.'"
The caucus further stated that Kirk held “racist, harmful, and fundamentally un-American” beliefs that would be inappropriately be dignified by supporting the resolution.
Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA and a key contributor to President Donald Trump's voter canvassing operation last year, has a long history of inflammatory and controversial statements on race.
Among many other things, he said passing the 1964 Civil Rights Act that guaranteed Black people a right to integrated public accommodation was a "mistake," repeatedly attacked Dr. Martin Luther King, has said that "prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people" in cities, said he believes airlines are endangering passengers with unqualified Black pilots hired to meet quotas, and paid tribute to a pastor who claimed slavery was a godly institution.
The killing of Kirk triggered a political firestorm around the country, and though both Democrats and Republicans alike were quick to condemn the crime, far-right voices all around the media began blaming the left before the manhunt for the killer had even concluded.
'Not about healing': Black Caucus hits out at Charlie Kirk honor
At a certain point it just looks like trolling.
Do you want to ask rich if he can send you an el risitas gif?
No, they didn't say anything contemptuous.
I challenge you to find anything contemptuous they said.
They said that what happened to Charlie was terrible, but what he said when he was alive was bigoted, which is just the truth.
Charlie was no hero.
Just an insignificant vile grifter whose death is being exploited by the administration to further their fascist agenda.
Jeffries really epitomizes the split in the dems right now. That side that is still pushing the Pelosi, guardian of the slightly more liberal billionaires, AIPAC funded establisment.
They'll lose again if they keep that up.
I'm sure its not too hard these days to find other youtube warriors ready to declare that Kirk's brand of white nationalism is ACTUAL JUSTICE WARRIOR material.
Just I'm sure what he says will make total sense to you as well.
Just as you seem dumbfounded when other people find some of what you say offensive.
Again, men's in women's bathrooms or sports is just a consequence of what is being argued. That the Civil Rights Act was noble in intention giving everyone equal rights, equal civil liberities. But the way the laws are written are too broad and are now being circumvented and not having the desired effects.
As for MLK, I believe Kirk used to revere MLK as a civil rights hero and but changed his tone because of damning evidence that has come to light about King's behaviour in his private life, i.e. his treatment of women.
I’m an MLK scholar – and I’ll never be able to view King in the same light
King was once thought of as a saint beyond reproach. It eventually emerged that he was a womanizer. But we now have to ask the unthinkable: Did King enable abuse?
theconversation.com
I don't see it that way and we can disagree. Quotas negatively affect quantitative metrics because standards are lowered. For example, a solider regardless of race, gender should meet a certain physical and intellectual standard in order to serve. These standards cannot be compromised. In business, merit and competency should be the only metric. Production and efficiency should not be compromised due to quotas. Why are we reducing humans and segregating them just on the basis of race or sexual orientation. Sounds awfully bigoted to. Id prefer to be judged on my achievements and my character rather than people seeing and judging me by my skin colour. Simple right?
There has been so many provided. They are incredibly easy to look up. Instead I challenge you to provide me something other than a 15 sec spliced clip with Charlie's racist views where he gets a chance to explain it in context. Like I said, there is a difference in methodologies on how we come to our conclusions. Id prefer not to rely on a 15 sec clip or some article that conveniently takes quotes out of context to base my opinion and like to get a fuller picture of all the evidence before coming to a conclusion.
I actually provided the clip where Joy Reid stated she is a DEI hire in direct response to you. Biden said Ketanji was a DEI hire.
So the crickets comment is inaccurate.
