Stochastic terrorism is the use of mass, indirect, and inflammatory rhetoric that demonizes targets and normalizes or makes violence more likely, while preserving plausible deniability because the speech is ambiguous or coded.
None of which charlie kirk advocated for. I mean if you watch some of his debates these views are not present. He debated, presented facts, and challenged the audience. I have seen on a few instances when an audience member presented an opinion that differed from his and he respected it and accepted their logic.
Sure he had a criminal record. Not sure what kind.
The point was empathy is an overused word in politics. Kirk highlighted the often-mocked Bill Clinton line "I feel your pain."
I can’t wait to see the statue of scumbag criminal George Floyd melted down and a statue of Charlie Kirk put in its place.
Yes, it was
The second half doesn't change the first. It reinforces it. And validates my contention.But, but it's so much easier to only use half the statement.
I never said floyd deserved to die. But he was being arrested at the time for using a counterfeit bill. Also, sticking up a woman with 5 other assailants lands you in scumbag territory.
He spoke against their political activism, he never said transgender people should not be born or any other indirect violent call. It s a slippery slope because it can easily be used by people like you to prevent anyone from opposing minorities activism, which is completely absurd.
He advocated for all of it.
How does the second sentence invalid what I said. It only reinforces it. He didn't believe in empathy. Just sympathy. But they are two very different things.
it is the absolute truth, and your distorted opinion will never change it
Stochastic terrorism is demonizing them.
Well, then am sure you can provide some evidence of the democratic party doing this.
