So you mean, your new right wing God Charlie Kirk was right here?What else is new is you Libs being wrong again
Charlie Kirk Shot in the Neck in Utah (Update: Shooter Alt-right links)
- Thread starter lir2016
- Start date
Post quoted so you cant delete it later
Or a vegan in disguise. Or a right wing son of a sheriff. Or a left wing son who rejected his sheriff father's conservatism. Or a son with mental health issues.
He looks like it all.
Let's see what else we learn.
But one damn thing is sure calling for revenge killings is not on. Calling for public executions is not on. Anyone who does needs to be ostracized and shamed, if possible.
Not as stupid as you pushing the theory that David Depape was Paul Pelosi’s gay ex lover though
Charlie pushed for public executions just to be publicly executed. The irony
You gotta love the lefties squirming and scrambling when it was indeed another lefty acting violent...far from the love and compassion you guys are selling...
first the denial - "must be a MAGA"
when reality sets in - "he asked for it"
then the 180 turn - "but Pelosi's attacker...blah blah blah"
pathetic but what else is new?
first the denial - "must be a MAGA"
when reality sets in - "he asked for it"
then the 180 turn - "but Pelosi's attacker...blah blah blah"
pathetic but what else is new?
No one has denied that this is most likely political violence.
I say most likely as his motive has not yet been established or published.
But it is also fact that the majority of political violence and terrorism in the country is from the right even if it is proven that this particular one is left wing terrorism.
You still haven't responded to my question about Charlie Kirk calling for public executions of politicians.
I'm sure the shoot disappointed you when he turns out not a schizo patient...just a liberal...a loving compassionate liberal.
Havent seen that video or article yet.
I'm going golfing right now, so I'll comment later.
In the meantime have a look at this, and lets hear your response:
I'm still not comfortable getting my news from Twitter.This is literally the whole world at this point. What do you mean it's bullshit? I read it in a twitter link
I follow a few well-known commentators on news and finance. The news guys are fairly agnostic politically.
One has to be very selective so as not to infect one's brain with junk tweets.
If one wants to hear anti-Trump propaganda all day, I'm sure Twitter is a good source.
The majority of the things said in the video are not problematic.
Most are 4 to 5 word cuts, not even the whole sentence.
Those are useless and deliberately cut that way to present things out of context.
The ones where a whole sentence is presented, are acceptable.
The only issues I had were with Cuomo and one other appearing to justify non-peaceful protests.
Which are still quite tame, but one I would disagree with.
WTF man, you have a life outside posting on social media?
My response is I hope you get hit in the head with an errant golf ball.
Last edited:
Now I know for a fact you don't get news from Twitter. lol.
Because if you did, you'd know what a far right wing cesspool Twitter really is led by a Nazi billionaire.
